Consumer awareness and attitudes related to new potential reduced-exposure tobacco products

American Journal of Health Behavior

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 431-437

  Parascandola, Mark ^a   Hurd, Ami L ^b   Augustson, Erik ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SHARP HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer survey; Personal health; PREP; Technology; Tobacco

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349113867     PISSN: 10873244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.32.4.10     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, et al. Editors. Clearing the Smoke: Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
2. Joseph AM, Hennrikus D, Thoele MJ, et al. Community tobacco control leaders' perceptions of harm reduction. Tob Control. 2004;13(2):108-113.
3. Wamer KE, Martin EG. The US tobacco control community's view of the future of tobacco harm reduction. Tob Control. 2003;12(4):383-390.
4. Martin EG, Warner KE, Lantz PM. Tobacco harm reduction: what do the experts think? Tob Control. 2004;13(2):123-128.
5. Shiffman S, Pillitteri JL, Burton SL, et al. Smokers' beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes. Tob Control. 2001;10(Suppl 1):i17-23.
6. National Cancer Institute. Risks Associated with Smoking Cigarettes with Low Machine-Measured Yields of Tar and Nicotine. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 13. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; NIH Pub No. 02-5047, October 2001.
7. Caraballo RS, Pederson LL, Gupta N. New tobacco products: do smokers like them? Tob Control. 2006;15(1):39-44.
8. Shiftman S, Pillitteri JL, Burton SL, et al. Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk. Tob Control. 2004;13(1):78-84.
9. Hund LM, Farrelly MC, Allen JA, et al. Findings and implications from a national study on potential reduced exposure products (PREPs). Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8(6):791-797.
10. Hickman N, Klonoff EA, Landrine H, et al. Preliminary investigation of the advertising and availability of PREPs, the new "safe" tobacco products. J Behav Med. 2004;27(4):413-424.
11. Steinik M. The Path to a Safer Cigarette: Potentially Reduced Exposure Products (PREPs). JP Morgan Global Equity Research. 2004.
12. Health Canada. Consumer Interest in Potential Reduced Exposure Products: Results of a Focus Group Study. Final Report. Toronto, Ontario; 2003 March.
13. Lau T, Kreslake J, Carpenter C. Consumer Perception of Advertising and Packaging for Marlboro UltraSmooth: Preliminary Focus Group Results. Tobacco Control Research Program, Division of Public Health Practice, Harvard School of Public Health; 2006 July.
14. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: The Free Press; 1995.
15. Shadel WG, Lerman C, Cappella J, et al. Evaluating smokers' reactions to advertising for new lower nicotine quest cigarettes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20(1):80-84.
16. O'Connell V. Marlboro cigarette avoids 'safer' claim, but scrutiny arises. Wall Street Journal. 2005 January 21;Sect. B1.
17. Hesse BW, Moser RP, Rutten LJ, Kreps GL. The health information national trends survey: research from the baseline. J Health Commun. 2006;11(Suppl 1):vii-xvi.