Tobacco harm reduction: What do the experts think?

Tobacco Control

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 123-128

  Martin, E G ^a   Warner, K E ^a   Lantz, P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE;

GOVERNMENT; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; TELEPHONE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FORECASTING; HARM REDUCTION; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NICOTINE; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 5644247213     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2003.006346     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Hébert R, ed. Harm reduction. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4(suppl 2):s47-193.
2. Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, et al. Clearing the smoke: assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 2001.
3. Warner KE, Martin EG. The U.S. tobacco control community's view of the future of tobacco harm reduction. Tobacco Control 2003;12:383-90.
4. Joseph AM, Hennrikus D, Thoele MJ, et al. Community tobacco control leaders' perceptions of harm reduction. Working paper. University of Minnesota, 2003.
5. Warner KE. Tobacco harm reduction: promise and perils. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2002;4(suppl 2):S61-71.
6. Shiffman S, Gitchell JG, Warner KE, et al. Tobacco harm reduction: conceptual structure and nomenclature for analysis and research. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4(suppl 2):S113-29.
7. Anon. Nicotine water. URL: http://rcheck.host.sk/cool/nw.htm [accessed September 25, 2003].
8. Anon. Nicotine fruit juice. URL: http://www.tobacco.org/news/134298.html [accessed September 25, 2003].
9. Anon. No smoking? No problem. URL: http://www.nicotinewafer.com/ faq.htm [accessed September 25, 2003].
10. Scientific Software. Atlas.ti software. Scientific Software, 1997.
11. Foulds J, Ramstrom L, Burke M, et al. Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tobacco Control 2003;12:349-59.
12. Bates C, Fagerstrom K, Jarvis MJ, et al. European Union policy on smoking tobacco: a statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health. Tobacco Control 2003;12:360-7.
13. Kozlowski LT, Strasser AA, Giovino GA, et al. Applying the risk/use equilibrium: use medicinal nicotine now for harm reduction. Tobacco Control 2001;10:201-3.
14. National Cancer Institute. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 13. Bethesda, Maryland: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, October 2001. (NIH Publication No. 02-5074).
15. Pauly JL, Lee HJ, Hurley EL, et al. Glass fiber contamination of cigarette filters: an additional health risk to the smoker? Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 1998,7:967-79.
16. Page JA. Federal regulation of tobacco products and products that treat tobacco dependence: Are the playing fields level? Food and Drug Law Journal 1998;53(suppl):11-42.
17. Hatsukami DK, Slade J, Benowitz NL, et al. Reducing tobacco harm: research challenges and issues. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4(suppl 2):S89-101.
18. Kozlowswki LT. Harm reduction, public health, and human rights: smokers have a right to be informed of significant harm reduction options. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4(suppl 2):S55-60.