The scrumpled geography of literacies for learning

Discourse

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 483-499

  Edwards, Richard ^a   Ivanič, Roz ^b   Mannion, Greg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Border crossing; Folding; Learning; Literacies; Literacy practices; Purification; Translation

Indexed keywords

EID: 70949094083     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596300903237248     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
3. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanič, R., (Eds.) (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
4. Bowker, G., & Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Breen, M.P. (1985). Authenticity in the language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 6, 60-70.
6. Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J., (Eds.) (1996). Understanding practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M., (Eds.) (2000). Multiliteracies. London: Routledge.
8. Crystal, D. (2008). txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Czarniawska, B., & Hernes, T., (Eds.) (2005). Actor-network theory and organizing. Malmo, Sweden: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
10. Doel, M. (1996). A hundred thousand lines of flight: A machinic introduction to the nomad thought and scrumpled geography of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. Environment and Planning D: Space and Society, 14, 421-439.
11. Edwards, R., Biesta, G., & Thorpe, M., (Eds.) (2009). Rethinking learning and teaching in context. London: Routledge.
12. Edwards, R., & Fowler, Z. (2007). Unsettling boundaries in making a space for research. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 107-123.
13. Edwards, R., & Miller, K. (2007). Putting the context into learning. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 15, 263-274.
14. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 247-274.
15. Gaskell, J., & Hepburn, G. (1998). The course as token: A construction of/by networks. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 65-76.
16. Gee, J.P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
17. Gee, J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Guile, D., & Young, M. (2003). Transfer and transition in vocational education: Some theoretical considerations. In T. Tuomi-Grohn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between work and school: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 63-83). London: Pergamon.
19. Hamilton, M. (2000). Expanding the New Literacy Studies: Using photographs to explore literacy as a social practice. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 16-34). London: Routledge.
20. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Ivanič, R. (2004a). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18, 220-245.
22. Ivanič, R. (2004b). Intertextual practices in the construction of multi-modal texts in inquirybased learning. In N. Shuart-Faris & D. Bloome (Eds.), Intertextuality and literacy in classrooms: Directions in educational research (pp. 279-314). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
23. Ivanič, R. (2006). Language, learning and identification. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickens, H. Woodfield & G. Clibbon (Eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics 7-29). London: Equinox.
24. Ivanič, R., Edwards, R., Barton, D., Martin-Jones, M., Fowler, Z., Hughes, B., et al. (2009). Improving learning in college: Rethinking literacies across the curriculum. London: Routledge.
25. Ivanič, R., Edwards, R., Satchwell, C., & Smith, J. (2007). Possibilities for pedagogy in further education: Harnessing the abundance of literacy. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 703-721.
26. Ivanič, R., & Satchwell, C. (2007). Boundary crossings: Networking and transforming literacies in research processes and college courses. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 101-124.
27. Kress, G. (2001). You've just got to learn how to see': Curriculum subjects, young people and schooled engagement with the world. Linguistics and Education, 11, 401-415.
28. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
29. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
30. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Lee, A. (1996). Gender, literacy, curriculum: Rewriting school geography. London: Taylor & Francis.
35. Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J.R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
36. Mannion, G., Miller, K., Gibb, I. & Goodman, R. (2009). Reading, writing and resonance: Striking chords across the contexts of students' everyday and college lives. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(3), 323-339.
37. McDermott, R. (1996). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269-305). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion. London: Falmer.
39. Nespor, J. (2003). Undergraduate curricula as networks and trajectories. In R. Edwards & R. Usher (Eds.), Space, curriculum and learning (pp. 93-108). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
40. Pardoe, S., & Ivanič, R. (2007). Literacies for learning in further education: Making reading and writing practices across the curriculum more useful for learning [DVD and accompanying booklet]. Lancaster, UK: PublicSpace. (Available from www.publicspace.org.uk)
41. Satchwell, C., & Ivanič, R. (2009). Reading and writing the self as a college student: Fluidity and ambivalence across contexts. In K. Ecclestone, G. Biesta, & M. Hughes (Eds.), Lost in transition? Change and becoming through the lifecourse. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
42. Star, S.L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (Vol. II, pp. 307-354). London: Pitman.
43. Star, S.L., & Greisemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
44. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y., (Eds.) (2003a). Between work and school: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. London: Pergamon.
45. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003b). Conceptualizing transfer: From standard notions to developmental notions. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between work and school: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 19-38). London: Pergamon.
46. Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8, 473-488.
47. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Wyatt-Smith, C., & Cumming, J. (2003). Curriculum literacies: Expanding domains of assessment. Assessment in Education, 10(1), 47-59.