The effect of funding changes on public sector nonprofit organizations: The case of Bushcare NSW

Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 213-227

  Lazarevski, Katie ^a   Irvine, Helen ^b   Dolnicar, Sara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Grant funding; Institutional theory; Public sector nonprofit organizations; Regulatory requirements

Indexed keywords

EID: 70849131720     PISSN: 10495142     EISSN: 15406997     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10495140802224852     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alexander, J. (2000). Adaptive strategies of Nonprofit human service organizations in an era of devolution and new public management. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10(3), 287-303.
2. Bennett, R., & Savani, S. (2004). Managing conflict between marketing and other functions within charitable organizations. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal 25(2), 180-200.
3. Centre for International Economics, CSIRO. (1999). Midterm Review of the Natural Heritage Trust. Retrieved September 2006 from http://www.nht.gov.au/review/mtrfinrpt/pubs/bushcare.pdf.
4. Commonwealth of Australia. (2003). Natural Heritage Trust Annual Report 2001 - 02. Retrieved September 2006 from http://www.nht.gov.au.
5. Commonwealth of Australia. (2004-05). Natural Heritage Trust Annual Report 2004 - 05. Retrieved September 2006 from http://www.nht.gov.au/publications/annrpt0405/pubs/chapter2.pdf.
6. Daellenbach, K., Davies, J., & Ashill, N. J. (2006). Understanding sponsorship and sponsorship relationships - multiple frames and multiple perspectives. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(February), 73-87.
7. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Journal of Sociology, 48(April), 147-160.
8. Dolnicar, S., Irvine, H., & Lazarevski, K. (2008). Mission or money? Competitive challenges facing public sector nonprofit organisations in an institutionalised environment. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(2),107-117.
9. Eikenberry, A. M., & Drapal Kluver, J. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review 64(2), 132-140.
10. Everingham, C. (1998). Making and breaking the corportist welfare state: 'New left' politics from participation to consultation. Third Sector Review, 4(1), 23-42.
11. Flack, T., & Ryan, C. (2005). Financial reporting by Australian nonprofit organisations: Dilemmas posed by government funders. Australian Journal of Public Administration 64(3), 69-77.
12. Georke, J. (2003). Taking the quantum leap: Nonprofits are now in business. An Australian perspective. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(4), 317-327.
13. Guthrie, J., & English, L. (1997). Performance information and programme evaluation in the Australian public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10(3), 154-164.
14. Guthrie, J., & Humphrey, C. (1996). Public sector financial management developments in Australia and Britain: Trends and contradictions. Research in Governmental Nonprofit Accounting, 9, 238-302.
15. Hall, P. D. (1990). Conflicting managerial cultures in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1(1, Winter), 153-165.
16. Hoque, Z. (2005). Securing institutional legitimacy or organizational effectiveness? A case examining the impact of public sector reform initiatives in an Australian local authority. International Journal of Public Sector Management 18(4), 367-82.
17. Hoque, Z., & Moll, J. (2001). Public sector reform. Implications for accounting, accountability and performance of state-owned entities - an Australian perspective. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 14(4), 304-326.
18. Irvine, H. (2000). Powerful friends: The institutionalisation of corporate accounting practices in an Australian religious/charitable organisation. Third Sector Review, 6(1/2), 5-26.
19. Johansson, S. (2003). Independent movement or government subcontractor? Strategic responses of voluntary organizations to institutional processes. 19(3), 209-224.
20. Lawton, A., McKevitt, D., & Millar, M. (2000). Coping with ambiguity: Reconciling external legitimacy and organizational implementation in performance measurement. Public Money & Management, 20(3), 13-20.
21. Lazarevski, Katie, Helen, Irvine, & Sara, Dolnicar. (2007). The effect of funding changes on public sector non-profit organisations: The case of Bushcare NSW. Paper presented September 27-28, at the International Nonprofit and Social Marketing (INSM) Conference, Griffith University, Brisbane.
22. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 340-363.
23. Modell, S. (2004). Performance measurement myths in the public sector: A research note. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(1), 39-55.
24. Myers, J. & Sacks, R. (2003). Tools, techniques and tightropes: The art of walking and talking private sector management in nonprofit organisations, is it just a question of balance? Financial Accountability & Management, 19(3), 287-305.
25. Pinho, J. C., & Macedo, I. M. (2006). The benefits and barriers associated with the use of the Internet within the nonprofit sector. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 16(1/2), 171-193.
26. Schlesinger, M., Mitchell, S., & Gray, B. H. (2004). Restoring public legitimacy to the nonprofit sector: a survey experiment using descriptions of nonprofit ownership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4, December), 673-710.
27. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Tuckman, H. P. (1998). Competition, commercialization, and the evolution of nonprofit organizational structures. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(2),175-94.