Performance Measurement Myths in the Public Sector: A Research Note

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 39-55

  Modell, Sven ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

institutional theory; myths; organizational learning; performance measurement; public sector

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345009899     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00185.x     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Abernethy, M. A. and J. U. Stoelwinder (1990), ‘Physicians and Resource Management in Hospitals: An Empirical Investigation’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 17–31.
2. Aidemark, L-G. (2001), ‘The Meaning of Balanced Scorecards in the Health Care Organization’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 23–40.
3. Atkinson, A. A., J. H. Waterhouse and R. B. Wells (1997), ‘A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Performance Measurement’, Sloan Management Review (Spring), pp. 25–37.
4. Ax, C. and T. Bjornenak, (2000), ‘The Bundling and Diffusion of Management Accounting Innovations – The Case of the Balanced Scorecard in Scandinavia’, Paper presented at the 23rd annual congress of the European Accounting Association (Munich).
5. Baier, V. E., J. G. March and H. Sætren (1986), ‘Implementation and Ambiguity’, Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 197–212.
6. Ballantine J., S. Brignall and S. Modell (1998), ‘Performance Measurement and Management in Public Health Services: A Comparison of UK and Swedish Practice’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 71–94.
7. Barley, S. R. and P. S. Tolbert (1997), ‘Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution’, Organization Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 93–117.
8. Ter Bogt, H. J. and G. J. Van Helden (2000), ‘Accounting Change in Dutch Government: Exploring the Gap between Expectations and Realizations’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 263–79.
9. Brignall, S. and S. Modell (2000), ‘An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the “New Public Sector”’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 281–306.
10. Broadbent, J., K. Jacobs and R. Laughlin, (2001), ‘Organizational Resistance Strategies to Unwanted Accounting and Finance Changes: The Case of General Medical Practice in the UK’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 565–86.
11. Brunsson N. (1985), The Irrational Organization(New York: John Wiley).
12. Brunsson N. (1989a), ‘Administrative Reforms as Routines’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 5, pp. 219–28.
13. Brunsson N. (1989b), The Organization of Hypocrisy(New York: John Wiley).
14. Burns, J. and R. W. Scapens (2000), ‘Conceptualising Management Accounting Change: An Institutional Framework’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No 1, pp. 3–25.
15. Carter, N. (1991), ‘Learning to Measure Performance: The Use of Indicators in Organizations’, Public Administration, Vol. 69, pp. 85–101.
16. Carter, N. P. Greer (1993), ‘Evaluating Agencies: Next Steps and Performance Indicators, Public Administration, Vol. 71, pp. 407–16.
17. Cavalluzzo, K. S. and C. D. Ittner (in press), ‘Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government’, Accounting, Organizations and Society.
18. Chow, C. W., D. Ganulin, K. Haddad and J. Williamson (1998), ‘The Balanced Scorecard: A Potent Tool for Energizing and Focusing Healthcare Organization Management’, Journal of Health Care Management, Vol. 43, pp. 263–80.
19. Cochrane, A. (1993), ‘From Financial Control to Strategic Management: The Changing Faces of Accountability in British Local Government’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp 30–51.
20. Covaleski, M. A and M. W. Dirsmith (1981), ‘MBO and Goal Directedness in a Hospital Context, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, pp. 409–18.pmid/10298233
21. Crossan, M. M., H. W. Lane and R. E. White (1999), ‘An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, pp. 522–37.
22. Czarniawska, B. and B. Joerges (1996), ‘Travels of Ideas’, in B. Czarniawska and G. Sevón (eds.), Translating Organizational Change (Berlin: de Gruyter).
23. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988), ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’, in L. G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (Cambridge MA: Ballinger).
24. Dirsmith, M. W. and S. F. Jablonsky (1979), ‘MBO, Political Rationality and Information Inductance’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 4, pp. 39–52.
25. Doolin, B. (1999), ‘Case Mix Management in a New Zealand Hospital: Rationalisation and Resistance’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 15, pp. 397–417.
26. Drucker, P. F. (1954), The Practice of Management(New York: Harper Business).
27. Drucker, P. F. (1976), ‘What Results Should You Expect? A User's Guide to MBO’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 36, pp. 12–19.
28. Edwards, P., M. Ezzamel, C. McLean and K. Robson (2000), ‘Budgeting and Strategy in Schools: The Elusive Link’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 16, pp. 309–34.
29. Feldman, M. S. and J. G. March (1981), ‘Information in Organizations as Symbol and Signal’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 171–86.
30. Forgione, D. A. (1997), ‘Health Care Financial and Quality Measures: International Call for a “Balanced Scorecard” Approach’, Journal of Health Care Finance, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 55–58.pmid/9327360
31. Hedberg, B. (1981) ‘How Organizations Learn and Unlearn’, in P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 1 (New York: Oxford University Press).
32. Hedberg, B. S. Jönsson (1989), ‘Between Myth and Action’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 5, pp. 177–85.
33. Hofstede, G. (1981), ‘Management Control of Public and Not-for-Profit Activities’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 6, pp. 193–211.
34. Holmblad Brunsson, K. (2002), ‘Management or Politics – or Both? How Management by Objectives May be Managed: A Swedish Example’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 189–209.
35. Hood, C. (1995), The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20, pp. 93–109.
36. Hopwood, A. (1984), ‘Accounting and the Pursuit of Efficiency’, in A. Hopwood and C. Tomkins (eds.), Issues in Public Sector Accounting(Philip Allen).
37. Huber, G. P. (1991), ‘Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures’, Organization Science, Vol. 2, pp. 88–115.
38. Ittner, C. D. and D. F. Larcker (1998), ‘Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 205–38.
39. Jacobs, K. (1998), ‘Costing Health Care: A Case Study of the Introduction of Cost and Budget Reports into a GP Association’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 55–70.
40. Johnsen, Å. (1999), ‘Implementation Mode and Local Government Performance Measurement: A Norwegian Experience’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 41–66.
41. Johnsen, Å. (2001), ‘Balanced Scorecard: Theoretical Perspectives and Public Management Implications’, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 319–30.
42. Jones, C. S. (1999a), ‘Developing Financial Accountability in British Acute Hospitals’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1–20.
43. Jones, C. S. (1999b), ‘Hierarchies, Networks and Management Accounting in NHS Hospitals, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 164–87.
44. Jönsson, S. A. and R. A. Lundin (1977), ‘Myths and Wishful Thinking as Management Tools’, in P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds.), Prescriptive Models of Organizations(Amsterdam: North-Holland).
45. Kaplan, R. S. (2001), ‘Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Vol. 11, pp. 353–70.
46. Kaplan, R. S. D. P. Norton (1992), ‘The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that Drive Performance’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 71–79.pmid/10119714
47. Kaplan, R. S. (1996), ‘Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 75–85.
48. Kaplan, R. S. (2001), ‘Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part I’, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15., No. 1, pp. 87–106.
49. Kloot, L. (1997), ‘Organizational Learning and Management Control Systems: Responding to Environmental Change’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 47–73.
50. Kloot, L. (2002), ‘Performance Management and Measurement in Universities: A Case Study’, Paper presented at the 25th annual congress of the European Accounting Association (Copenhagen).
51. Kloot, L. J. Martin (2000), ‘Strategic Performance Management: A Balanced Approach to Performance Management Issues in Local Government’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 231–51.
52. Lapsley, I. (1994), ‘Responsibility Accounting Revived? Market Reforms and Budgetary Control in Health Care’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, pp. 337–52.
53. Lapsley, I. (1996), Reflections on Performance Measurement in the Public Sector, in I. Lapsley and F. Mitchell (eds.), Accounting and Performance Measurement. Issues in the Private and Public Sectors(London: Paul Chapman Publishing).
54. Lapsley, I. F. Mitchell (1996), ‘The Accounting Challenge: Performance Measurement in the Private and Public Sectors’, in I. Lapsley and F. Mitchell (eds.), Accounting and Performance Measurement. Issues in the Private and Public Sectors(London: Paul Chapman Publishing).
55. Lawrence, S. and U. Sharma (2002), ‘Commodification of Education and Academic Labour – Using the Balanced Scorecard in a University Setting’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 13, pp. 661–77.
56. Lawton, A., D. McKevitt and M. Millar (2000), ‘Coping with Ambiguity: Reconciling External Legitimacy and Organizational Implementation in Performance Measurement’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 13–19.
57. Lindkvist, L. (1996), ‘Performance Based Compensation in Health Care – A Swedish Experience’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 89–105.
58. Llewellyn, S. (1996), ‘Performance Management in the Social Services: Its Meaning and Measurement’, in I. Lapsley and F. Mitchell (eds.), Accounting and Performance Measurement. Issues in the Private and Public Sectors(London: Paul Chapman Publishing).
59. Llewellyn, S. (1998), ‘Pushing Budgets Down the Line: Ascribing Financial Responsibility in the UK Social Service’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 292–308.
60. Lowe, A. and B. Doolin (1999), ‘Casemix Accounting Systems: New Spaces for Action’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 181–201.
61. Lozeau, D., A. Langley and J-L Denis (2002), ‘The Corruption of Managerial Techniques by Organizations’, Human Relations, Vol. 55, pp. 537–64.
62. March, J. G. (1987), ‘Ambiguity and Accounting: The Elusive Link Between Information and Decision Making’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12, pp. 153–68.
63. Mayston, D. J. (1985), ‘Non-profit Performance Indicators in the Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 51–73.
64. McKendrick, J. and M. Hastings (2002), ‘The Development of a Performance Framework for Professions Allied to Medicine in Rehabilitation’, Paper presented at the annual congress of the British Accounting Association (St. Helier).
65. McKevitt, D. and A. Lawton (1996), ‘The Manager, the Citizen, the Politician and Performance Measures’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 49–54.
66. Meyer, J. W. and B. Rowan (1977), ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, pp. 340–63.
67. Meyer, M. W. and V. Gupta (1994), ‘The Performance Paradox’, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, pp. 309–69.
68. Modell, S. (2000), ‘Integrating Management Control and Human Resource Management in Public Health Care: Swedish Case Study Evidence’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 33–53.
69. Modell, S. (2001), ‘Performance Measurement and Institutional Processes: A Study of Managerial Responses to Public Sector Reform’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 437–64.
70. Modell, S. (in press), ‘Goals versus Institutions: The Development of Performance Measurement in the Swedish University Sector’, Management Accounting Research.
71. Norreklit, H. (2000), ‘The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard – A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 65–88.
72. Olson, O., J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (eds.) (1998), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management(Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag).
73. Pettersen, I. J. (1995), ‘Budgetary Control of Hospitals–Ritual, Rhetorics and Rationalized Myths?’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 207–21.
74. Pettersen, I. J. (2001), ‘The Challenge of Interpreting Performance in Health Care: A Study of Intensive Units in Norwegian Hospitals’, Advances in Health Care Management, Vol. 2, pp. 341–67.
75. Poister, T. H. and G. Streib (1995), ‘MBO in Municipal Government: Variations on a Traditional Management Tool’, Public Administration, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 48–56.
76. Pollitt, C. (1986), ‘Beyond the Managerial Model: the Case for Broadening Performance Assessment in Government and the Public Services’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 155–70.
77. Powell, W. W. (1988), ‘Institutional Effects on Organizational Structure and Performance’, in L. G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations(Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).
78. Purdy, D. E. (1993), ‘Ward Sisters and Financial Management Accounting’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 9, No. 4 pp. 279–96.
79. Quattrone, P. and T. Hopper (2001), ‘What Does Organizational Change Mean? Speculations on a Taken for Granted Category’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, pp. 403–35.
80. Sanderson, I. (2001), ‘Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in “Modern” Local Government,’Public Administration, Vol. 79, pp. 297–313.
81. Scott, W. R. (1987), ‘The Adolescence of Institutional Theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, pp. 493–511.
82. Sharifi, S. and T. Bovaird (1995), ‘The Financial Management Initiative in the UK Public Sector: The Symbolic Role of Performance Reporting’, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 18, pp. 467–90.
83. Tolbert, P. S. and L. G. Zucker (1996), ‘The Institutionalisation of Institutional Theory’, in S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies(Thousand Oaks, Sage).