Rapid DNA barcoding analysis of large datasets using the composition vector method

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL.14, 2009, Pages

  Chu, Ka H ^a   Xu, Minli ^a,b   Li, Chi P ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b University of North Carolina at Charlotte   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAR CODES; DNA; DNA SEQUENCES; FISH; RNA;

AVERAGE LENGTH; COMPOSITION VECTORS; LARGE DATASETS; RATE-LIMITING STEPS; RELIABLE METHODS; RRNA SEQUENCES; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES;

LARGE DATASET;

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE SUBUNIT 1; RNA 16S; RNA 18S; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BIRD; COMPOSITION VECTOR METHOD; CRUSTACEA; DNA BARCODING; DNA SEQUENCE; FISH; GENE CLUSTER; GENETIC DATABASE; NEMATODE; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE CONSTRUCTION METHOD; RELIABILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; TAXONOMY;

AVES; CRUSTACEA; NEMATODA; PISCES;

EID: 70749129778     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S14-S8     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B 2003, 270:313-321.
2. Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B 2003, 270:S96-S99.
3. Miller SE. DNA barcoding and the renaissance of taxonomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:4775-4776. 10.1073/pnas.0700466104, 1829212, 17363473.
4. Hebert PD, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:e312. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312, 518999, 15455034.
5. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005, 360:1847-1857. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716, 1609232, 16214743.
6. Vences M, Thomas M, van der Meijden A, Chiari Y, Vieites DR. Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front Zool 2005, 2:5-16. 10.1186/1742-9994-2-5, 555853, 15771783.
7. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System http://www.barcodinglife.org. Mol Ecol Notes 2007, 7:355-364. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x, 1890991, 18784790.
8. Hajibabaei M, deWaard JR, Ivanova NV, Ratnasingham S, Dooh RT, Kirk SL, Mackie PM, Hebert PDN. Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005, 360:1959-1967. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1727, 1609220, 16214753.
9. Pennisi E. Wanted: A barcode for plants. Science 2007, 318:190-191. 10.1126/science.318.5848.190, 17932267.
10. Frézal L, Leblois R. Four years of DNA barcoding: current advances and prospects. Infect Genet Evol 2008, 8:727-736. 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.05.005, 18573351.
11. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:8369-8374. 10.1073/pnas.0503123102, 1142120, 15928076.
12. Sass C, Little DP, Stevenson DW, Specht CD. DNA barcoding in the cycadales: testing the potential of proposed barcoding markers for species identification of cycads. PLoS One 2007, 11:e1154.
13. Chu KH, Li CP, Qi J. Ribosomal RNA as molecular barcodes: A simple correlation analysis without sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1690-1701. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl146, 16613905.
14. Holterman M, van der Wurff A, van der Elsen S, van Megen H, Bongers T, Holovachov O, Bakker J, Helder J. Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. Mol Biol Evol 2006, 23:1792-1800. 10.1093/molbev/msl044, 16790472.
15. Floyd R, Abebe E, Papert A, Blaxter M. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Mol Ecol 2002, 11:839-850. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01485.x, 11972769.
16. Hollingsworth ML, Clark AA, Forrest LL, Richardson J, Pennington RT, Long DG, Cowan R, Chase MW, Gaudeul M, Hollingsworth PM. Selecting barcoding loci for plants: evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants. Mol Ecol Resour 2009, 9:439-457.
17. Wheeler W. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics?. Cladistics 1996, 12:1-9.
18. Lutzoni F, Wagner P, Reeb V, Zoller S. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst Biol 2000, 49:628-651. 10.1080/106351500750049743, 12116431.
19. Geiger DL. Stretch coding and block coding: two new strategies to represent questionably aligned DNA sequences. J Mol Evol 2002, 54:191-199. 10.1007/s00239-001-0001-5, 11821912.
20. Eddy SR. What is dynamic programming?. Nature Biotechnol 2004, 22:909-910.
21. Noé L, Kucherov G. Improved hit criteria for DNA local alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:149. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-149, 526756, 15485572.
22. Qi J, Wang B, Hao BI. Whole proteome prokaryote phylogeny without sequence alignment: a K-string composition approach. J Mol Evol 2004, 58:1-11. 10.1007/s00239-003-2493-7, 14743310.
23. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:e312. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312, 518999, 15455034.
24. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673, 308517, 7984417.
25. Katoh T, Toh H. Improved accuracy of multiple ncRNA alignment by incorporating structural information into a MAFFT-based framework. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:212. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-212, 2387179, 18439255.
26. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:113. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113, 517706, 15318951.
27. Yu ZG, Zhou LQ, Anh VV, Chu KH, Long SC, Deng JQ. Phylogeny of prokaryotes and chloroplasts revealed by a simple composition approach on all protein sequences from complete genomes without sequence alignment. J Mol Evol 2005, 60:538-545. 10.1007/s00239-004-0255-9, 15883888.
28. Chu KH, Qi J, Yu ZG, Anh V. Origin and phylogeny of chloroplasts revealed by a simple correlation analysis of complete genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2004, 21:200-206. 10.1093/molbev/msh002, 14595102.
29. Qi J, Luo H, Hao B. CVTree: a phylogenetic tree reconstruction tool based on whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:W1-W3.
30. Pevzner PA. Computational Molecular Biology: An Algorithmic Approach 2000, 75. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
31. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4(4):406-425.
32. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP--phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 1989, 5:164-166.
33. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. MEGA 3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 2004, 5:150-163. 10.1093/bib/5.2.150, 15260895.
34. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980, 16:111-120. 10.1007/BF01731581, 7463489.