Family Business Research in the New Millennium: An Overview of the Who, the Where, the What, and the Why

Family Business Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 151-166

  Debicki, Bart J ^a   Matherne III, Curtis F ^b   Kellermanns, Franz W ^a,c   Chrisman, James J ^a,d  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WHU OTTO BEISHEIM SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

family business research directions; family business research topics; scholarly impact; scholarly networks; university impact

Indexed keywords

EID: 70749085296     PISSN: 08944865     EISSN: 17416248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894486509333598     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis.Journal of Management Studies. 2006;43:957-983.
2. Leading accounting departments revisited.Accounting Review. 1978;53:135-139.
3. Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately-held family businesses: Advancing traditional business valuation.Family Business Review. 2008;21:139-149.
4. Studying the family enterprise holistically.Family Business Review. 2009;22:82-95.
5. A comparison of published accounting research and qualities of accounting faculty and doctoral programs.Accounting Review. 1975;50:605-610.
6. University research centers and the composition of research collaborations.Research Policy. 2008;37:900-913.
7. UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis [Computer software]. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies; 2002:.
8. Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR.Family Business Review. 2007;20:141-162.
9. Management journals as venues for publication of family business research.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2008;32:927-934.
10. Comparing the agency cost of family and non-family firms.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2004;28:225-254.
11. Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm (Cole Whiteman Paper Series). 2003:.
12. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2005;29:555-576.
13. Family influences on firms: An introduction.Journal of Business Research. 2007;60:1005-1011.
14. Toward a theoretical basis for understanding the dynamics of strategic performance in family firms.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2008;32:935-947.
15. The management of family firms: An empirical investigation.International Small Business Journal. 1995;13 (4): 11-34.
16. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work.Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47:928-937.
17. Factors preventing intra-family succession.Family Business Review. 2008;21:183-199.
18. Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS.Family Business Review. 1991;4:149-160.
19. Ranking and explaining the scholarly impact of law schools.Journal of Legal Studies. 1998;27:373-414.
20. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarifications.Social Networks. 1979;1:215-239.
21. Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2007;52:106-137.
22. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms.Family Business Review. 1999;12:1-25.
23. Most frequent contributors to the finance literature.Financial Management. 1988;17:100-108.
24. Family entrepreneurship.Journal of Small Business Management. 2008;46:313-316.
25. Market shares of space in marketing journals.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1976;4:473-483.
26. Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad.Journal of Business Venturing. 2004;19:509-534.
27. The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876-1999.Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18:283-300.
28. Understanding the non-economic motivated behavior in family firms: An introduction.Family Business Review. 2008;20:121-125.
29. Pruning the family tree: An unexplored path to family business continuity and family harmony.Family Business Review. 2008;21:295-313.
30. Conflicts that plague family businesses.Harvard Business Review. 1971;49:90-98.
31. The emerging forum for entrepreneurship scholars.Journal of Business Venturing. 1993;8:377-381.
32. Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level.Research Policy. 2000;29:31-40.
33. An analysis of significant contributions to the international business literature.Journal of International Business Studies. 1991;22:143-152.
34. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks.Social Networks. 2005;27:39-54.
35. Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century.Journal of Management. 2008;34:641-720.
36. Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship.Journal of Business Venturing. 2003;18:559-566.
37. Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms.Managerial and Decision Economics. 2002;23:247-259.
38. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence.Organization Science. 2001;12:99-116.
39. Who is publishing the entrepreneurship research.Journal of Management. 1997;23:83-95.
40. An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for future.Family Business Review. 2004;17:1-36.
41. The practice-driven evolution of family business education.Journal of Business Research. 2007;60:1012-1021.
42. Centers and institutes in the research university.Journal of Higher Education. 1994;65:540-554.
43. Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1998;23:31-56.
44. Predicting early career research productivity: The case of management faculty.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2003;24:25-44.
45. On the emotional value of owning a firm.Family Business Review. 2008;21:347-363.