Finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with composite resin and posts

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 671-678

  Coelho, Carla Santina de Miranda ^a   Biffi, João Carlos Gabrielli ^b   da Silva, Gisele Rodrigues ^b   Abrahão, Anthony ^b   Campos, Roberto Elias ^b   Soares, Carlos José ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE BRASÍLIA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Posts; Weakened roots

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CARBON; CARBON FIBER; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; LEUCITE; RESIN; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TOOTH ROOT; YOUNG MODULUS;

ALUMINUM; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BITE FORCE; CARBON; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TOOTH ROOT; TOOTH, NONVITAL; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 70649101176     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.28.671     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 262-269.
2. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 360-367.
3. Erkut S, Eminkahyagil N, Imirzalioglu P, Tunga U. A technique for restoring an overflared root canal in an anterior tooth. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 581-583.
4. Yoldas O, Akova T, Uysal H. An experimental analysis of stresses in simulated flared root canals subjected to various post-core applications. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 427-432.
5. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 709-715.
6. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Pins and posts - why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am 1976; 20: 299-311.
7. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994; 3: 243-250.
8. Christensen GJ. Intracoronal and extracoronal tooth restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 557-560.
9. Helfer AR, Melnick S, Schilder H. Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34: 661-670.
10. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 565-567.
11. Zarone F, Apicella D, Sorrentino R, Ferro V, Aversa R, Apicella A. Influence of tooth preparation design on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of alumina porcelain veneers: a 3D-finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 1178-1188.
12. Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 2005; 38: 2375-2389.
13. Albuquerque R de C, Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 936-943.
14. Deutsch AS, Cavallari J, Musikant BL. Guidelines for clinically safe prefabricated post insertion. N Y J Dent 1983; 53: 109-111.
15. Schatz D, Alfter G, Goz G. Fracture resistance of human incisors and premolars: morphological and patho-anatomical factors. Dent Traumatol 2001; 17: 167-173.
16. Santos-Filho PCF, Castro CG, Silva GR, Campos RE, Soares CJ. Effects of post system and length on the strain and fracture resistance of root filled bovine teeth. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 493-501.
17. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 321-329.
18. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 140-147.
19. Lu ZY, Zhang YX. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 368-373.
20. Soares CJ, Castro CG, Santos Filho PC, Soares PV, Magalhães D, Martins LR. Two-Dimensional FEA of dowels of different compositions and external surface configurations. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 36-42.
21. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 591-594.
22. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 527-532.
23. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 151-157.
24. Hedlund SO, Johansson NG, Sjogren G. A retrospective study of pre-fabricated carbon fibre root canal posts. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 1036-1040.
25. Freedman G. Bonded post-endodontic rehabilitation. Dent Today 1996; 15: 50-53.
26. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod 1998; 24: 807-810.
27. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA Jr. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 483-491.
28. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Ravnholt G, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Resistance to cyclic loading of teeth restored with posts. Clin Oral Investig 2005; 9: 84-90.
29. Isidor F, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 257-261.
30. Huysmans MC, van der Varst PG, Schafer R, Peters MC, Plasschaert AJ, Soltesz U. Fatigue behavior of direct post- and-core-restored premolars. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1145-1150.
31. Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LRM. Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2005; 19: 11-16.
32. Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: A mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 442-448.
33. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL, Rengo S. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites. J Biomech 2001; 34: 1269-1277.
34. Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 558-567.
35. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 421-427.
36. Huysmans MC, Van der Varst PG. Finite element analysis of quasistatic and fatigue failure of post and cores. J Dent 1993; 21: 57-64.
37. Ho MH, Lee SY, Chen HH, Lee MC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 367-372.
38. Lui JL. Depth of composite polymerization within simulated root canals using light-transmitting posts. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 165-168.
39. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 10-14.
40. Clelland NL, Ismail YH, Zaki HS, Pipko D. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 391-398.
41. Rubin C, Krishnamurthy N, Capilouto E, Yi H. Stress analysis of the human tooth using a three-dimensional finite element model. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 82-86.
42. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D, Valentino B, Ferrari M, Aversa R, Apicella A. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: A 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1035-1044.
43. Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconium. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23: 45-61.
44. Fischer H, Dautzenberg G, Marx R. Nondestructive estimation of the strength of dental ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 289-295.