TMS and the functional neuroanatomy of attention

Cortex

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 114-117

  Chambers, Christopher D ^a,b   Heinen, Klaartje ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROIMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 70649095944     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.002     Document Type: Note

References (61)

1. Bestmann S., Baudewig J., Siebner H.R., Rothwell J., and Frahm J. Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits. European Journal of Neuroscience 19 (2004) 1950-1962
2. Bestmann S., Ruff C.C., Blakemore C., Driver J., and Thilo K.V. Spatial attention changes excitability of human visual cortex to direct stimulation. Current Biology 17 (2007) 134-139
3. Blankenburg F., Ruff C.C., Bestmann S., Bjoertomt O., Eshel N., Josephs O., et al. Interhemispheric effect of parietal TMS on somatosensory response confirmed directly with concurrent TMS-fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience 28 (2008) 13202-13208
4. Boroojerdi B., Prager A., Muellbacker M.D., and Cohen M.D. Reduction of human visual cortex excitiability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 54 (2000) 1529-1531
5. Cattaneo Z., and Silvanto J. Time course of the state-dependent effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the TMS-adaptation paradigm. Neuroscience Letters 443 (2008) 82-85
6. Chambers C.D., Payne J.M., and Mattingley J.B. Parietal disruption impairs reflexive spatial attention within and between sensory modalities. Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 1715-1724
7. Chambers C.D., Payne J.M., Stokes M.G., and Mattingley J.B. Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004) 217-218
8. Chambers C.D., Stokes M.G., Janko N.E., and Mattingley J.B. Enhancement of visual selection during transient disruption of parietal cortex. Brain Research 1097 (2006) 149-155
9. Chambers C.D., Stokes M.G., and Mattingley J.B. Modality-specific control of strategic spatial attention in parietal cortex. Neuron 44 (2004) 925-930
10. Colby C.L., and Goldberg M.E. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 22 (1999) 319-349
11. Corbetta M., Akbudak E., Conturo T.E., Snyder A.Z., Ollinger J.M., Drury H.A., et al. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21 (1998) 761-772
12. Corbetta M., Patel G., and Shulman G.L. The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58 (2008) 306-324
13. Corbetta M., and Shulman G. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002) 201-215
14. Corthout E., Uttl B., Ziemann U., Cowey A., and Hallet M. Two periods of processing in the (circum)striate visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 137-145
15. Desimone R., and Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 18 (1995) 193-222
16. Driver J., and Mattingley J.B. Parietal neglect and visual awareness. Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998) 17-22
17. Eimer M., and van Velzen J. Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 437-449
18. Fuggetta G., Pavone E.F., Walsh V., Kiss M., and Eimer M. Cortico-cortical interactions in spatial attention: A combined erp/TMS study. Journal of Neurophysiology 95 (2006) 3277-3280
19. Grosbras M.-H., and Paus T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 1109-1120
20. Heinen K., Jolij J., and Lamme V.A.F. Figure-ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in v1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. NeuroReport 16 (2005) 1483-1487
21. Hilgetag C.C., Theoret H., and Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 953-957
22. Juan C.-H., Muggleton N.G., Tzeng O.J.L., Hung D.L., Cowey A., and Walsh A. Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields. Cerebral Cortex 18 (2008) 2410-2415
23. Juan C.H., Shorter-Jacobi M.S., and Schall J.D. Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (2004) 15541-15544
24. Kammer T. Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Psychological Research 71 (2007) 659-666
25. Kastner S., and Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23 (2000) 315-341
26. Kelley T., Serences J., Giesbrecht B., and Yantis S. Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention. Cerebral Cortex 18 (2008) 114-125
27. Laycock R., Crewther D., Fitzgerald P.B., and Crewther S. Evidence for fast signals and later processing in human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: a TMS study of motion perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 98 (2007) 1253-1262
28. Macaluso E., Frith C.D., and Driver J. Supramodal effects of covert spatial orienting triggered by visual or tactile events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 389-401
29. Moore T., Armstrong K.M., and Fallah M. Visuomotor origins of covert spatial attention. Neuron 40 (2003) 671-683
30. Muggleton NG, Juan C-H, Cowey A, Walsh V and O'Breathnach, U. Human frontal eye fields and target switching. Cortex, in press, doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.011.
31. Müri R.M., Bühler R., Heinemann D., Mosimann U.P., Felblinger J., Schlaepfer T.E., et al. Hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Experimental Brain Research 143 (2002) 426-430
32. O'Shea J., Muggleton N.G., Cowey A., and Walsh V. Timing of target discrimination in human frontal eye fields. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (2004) 1060-1067
33. Pascual-Leone A., Gomez-Tortosa E., Grafman J., Alway D., Nichelli P., and Hallet M. Induction of visual extinction by rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of parietal lobe. Neurology 44 (1994) 494-498
34. Pascual-Leone A., and Walsh A. Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science 292 (2001) 510-512
35. Ramos-Estebanez C., Merabet L.B., Machii K., Fregni F., Thut G., Wagner T.A., et al. Visual phosphene perception modulated by subthreshold crossmodal sensory stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience 27 (2007) 4178-4181
36. Rauschecker A.M., Bestmann S., Walsh V., and Thilo K.V. Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli. Experimental Brain Research 157 (2004) 124-127
37. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., and Umilta C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25 (1987) 31-40
38. Ro T. What can TMS tell us about visual awareness. Cortex, 46: 110-113, 2009.
39. Ro T., Breitmeyer B., Burton P., Singhal N.S., and Lane D. Feedback contributions to visual awareness in human occipital cortex. Current Biology 13 (2003) 1038-1041
40. Romei V., Brodbeck V., Michel C., Amedi A., Pascual-Leone A., and Thut G. Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. Cerebral Cortex 18 (2008) 2010-2018
41. Romei V., Murray M.M., Merabet L., and Thut G. Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has opposing effects on visual and auditory stimulus detection: implications for multisensory interactions. Journal of Neuroscience 24 (2007) 11465-11472
42. Romei V., Rihs T., Brodbeck V., and Thut G. Resting electroencephalogram alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability. NeuroReport 19 (2008) 203-208
43. Ruff C.C., Bestmann S., Blankenburg F., Bjoertomt O., Josephs O., Weiskopf N., et al. Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. Cerebral Cortex 18 (2007) 817-827
44. Ruff C.C., Blankenburg F., Bjoertomt O., Bestmann S., Freeman E., Haynes J.-D., et al. Concurrent TMS-fMRI and psychophysics reveal frontal influences on human retinotopic visual cortex. Current Biology 16 (2006) 1479-1488
45. Ruff CC, Driver J, and Bestmann S. Combining TMS and fMRI: From 'virtual lesions' to functional-network accounts of cognition. Cortex, 45: 1043-1049, 2009.
46. Rushworth M.F.S., Ellison A., and Walsh A. Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 656-661
47. Saalman Y., Pigarev I., and Vidyasagar T. Neural mechanisms of visual attention: how top-down feedback highlights relevant locations. Science 316 (2007) 1612-1615
48. Sack A.T., Kohler A., Bestmann S., Linden D.E.J., Dechent P., Goebel R., et al. Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous fMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies. Cerebral Cortex 17 (2007) 2841-2852
49. Schenkluhn B.M., Ruff C.C., Heinen K., and Chambers C.D. Parietal stimulation decouples spatial and feature-based attention. Journal of Neuroscience 28 (2008) 11106-11110
50. Seyal M., Ro T., and Rafal R. Increased sensitivity to ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal lobe. Annals of Neurology 38 (1995) 264-267
51. Shulman G.L., Astafiev S.V., McAvoy M., d'Avossa G., and Corbetta M. Right tpj deactivation during visual search: functional significance and support for a filter hypothesis. Cerebral Cortex 17 (2007) 2625-2633
52. Silvanto J., Cattaneo Z., Batteli L., and Pascual-Leone A. Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology 99 (2008) 2725-2730
53. Silvanto J., Lavie N., and Walsh V. Stimulation of the human frontal eye fields modulates sensitivity of extrastriate visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 96 (2006) 941-945
54. Silvanto J., and Muggleton N.G. New light through old windows: moving beyond the "virtual lesion" approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage 39 (2008) 549-552
55. Silvanto J., and Muggleton N.G. Testing the validity of the TMS state-dependency approach: targeting functionally distinct motion-selective neural populations in visual areas v1/v2 and v5/mt+. NeuroImage 40 (2008) 1841-1848
56. Silvanto J., Muggleton N.G., Lavie N., and Walsh V. The perceptual and functional consequences of parietal top-down modulation on the visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 19 (2009) 327-330
57. Singh K.D., and Fawcett I. Transient and linearly graded deactivation of the human default-mode network by a visual detection task. NeuroImage 15 (2008) 100-112
58. Smith D.T., Jackson S.R., and Rorden C. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 1288-1296
59. Sparing R., Mottaghy F.M., Ganis G., Thompson W.L., Töpper R., Kosslyn S.M., et al. Visual cortex excitability increases during visual mental imagery - a TMS study in healthy human subjects. Brain Research 938 (2002) 92-97
60. Taylor P.C.J., Nobre A.C., and Rushworth M.F.S. FEF TMS affects visual cortex activity. Cerebral Cortex 17 (2007) 391-399
61. Thut G., Nietzel A., and Pascual-Leone A. Dorsal posterior parietal rTMS affects voluntary orienting of spatial attention. Cerebral Cortex 15 (2005) 628-638