Process materialization using templates and rules to design flexible process models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5858 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 122-136

  Kumar, Akhil ^a   Yao, Wen ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Flexible processes; Materialization; Rules; Templates

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS POLICIES; BUSINESS RULES; CONTROL FLOWS; FLEXIBLE PROCESS; FLEXIBLE PROCESSES; GENERIC PROCESS; HOLISTIC APPROACH; LOGIC-BASED LANGUAGES; PROCESS INSTANCES; PROCESS KNOWLEDGE; ROBUST PROCESS DESIGN; WORKFLOW ENGINES;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; INTERCHANGES;

PROCESS DESIGN;

EID: 70649094232     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04985-9_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The Application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management. The Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers 8(1), 21-66 (1998)
2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(3), 5-51 (2003)
3. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Rosemann, M., Dumas, M.: Deadline-based escalation in process-aware information systems. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 492-511 (2007)
4. Bhattacharya, K., et al.: Towards Formal Analysis of Artifact-Centric Business Process Models. In: Business Process Management (BPM), Brisbane, Australia, pp. 288-304 (2007)
5. Chiu, D.K.W., Li, Q., Karlapalem, K.: Web interface-driven cooperative exception handling in ADOME workflow management system. Web Information Systems Engineering 26(2), 93-120 (2001)
6. Clocksin, W.F., Mellish, C.S.: Programming in Prolog. Springer, New York (1987)
7. Curbera, F., Khalaf, R., Leymann, F., Weerawarana, S.: Exception Handling in the BPEL4WS Language. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 276-290. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
8. Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Hofstede, A.H.M.: Process Aware Information Systems. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken (2005)
9. Goedertier, S., Vanthienen, J.: Designing Compliant Business Processes with Obligations and Permission. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Business Process Design, pp. 5-14 (2006)
10. Goedertier, S., Mues, C., Vanthienen, J.: Specifying process-aware access control rules in SBVR. In: Paschke, A., Biletskiy, Y. (eds.) RuleML 2007. LNCS, vol. 4824, pp. 39-52. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
11. Halliday, J.J., et al.: Flexible Workflow Management in the OPENflow System. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2001), pp. 82-92 (2001)
12. Hwang, S.-Y., Tang, J.: Consulting past exceptions to facilitate workflow exception handling. Decision Support Systems 37(1), 49-69 (2004)
13. JBoss Community, Drools Flow, http://www.jboss.org/drools/drools-flow. html
14. Joeris, G.: Defining Flexible Workflow Execution Behaviors. In: Enterprise-wide and Cross-enterprise Workflow Management: Concepts, Systems, Applications, GI Workshop Proceedings - Informatik, pp. 49-55 (1999)
15. Kiepuszewski, B., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Bussler, C.J.: On structured workflow modelling. In: Wangler, B., Bergman, L.D. (eds.) CAiSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1789, pp. 431-445. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
16. Kumar, A., Liu, R.: A rule-based framework using role patterns for business process compliance. In: Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2008. LNCS, vol. 5321, pp. 58-72. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
17. Kumar, A., Wang, J.: A framework for designing resource driven workflow systems. In: Rosemann, M., vom Brocke, J. (eds.) The International Handbook on Business Process Management, Springer, Heidelberg (2009) (forthcoming)
18. Lienhard, H., Künzi, U.-M.: Workflow and business rules: a common approach. BPTrends., http://www.bptrends.com/
19. Mangan, P., Sadiq, S.: On Building Workflow Models for Flexible Processes. In: Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Conference on Database Technologies (ADC), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, vol. 5, pp. 103-109 (2002)
20. Müller, R., Rahm, E.: Rule-Based Dynamic Modification of Workflows in a Medical Domain. In: Buchmann, A.P. (ed.) BTW 1999, Freiburg im Breisgau, pp. 429-448. Springer, Berlin (1999)
21. OMG, Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 1.0. OMG Final Adopted Specification, Object Management Group (2006)
22. Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Adept-flex - Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 10(2), 93-129 (1998)
23. Reijers, H., et al.: Improved Model Management with Aggregated Business Process Models. Data and Knowledge Engineering 68(2), 221-243 (2009)
24. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems. Data and Knowledge Engineering 50(1), 9-34 (2004)
25. Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A configurable reference modeling language. Information Systems 32(1), 1-23 (2007)
26. Weske, M.: Flexible Modeling and Execution of Workflow Activities. In: Proceedings of the 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 713-722 (1998)
27. XPDL. Workflow management coalition workflow standard, http://www.wfmc.org/xpdl.html