Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems - A survey

Data and Knowledge Engineering

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 9-34

  Rinderle, Stefanie ^a   Reichert, Manfred ^a   Dadam, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptive systems; Correctness criteria; Dynamic workflow changes; Workflow management

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS CONTROL;

ADAPTIVE WORKFLOWS; CORRECTNESS CRITERIA; DYNAMIC WORKFLOW CHANGES; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 2542499112     PISSN: 0169023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2004.01.002     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. A. Agostini, G. DeMichelis, Improving flexibility of workflow management systems. In: BPM'00, LNCS, vol. 1806, 2000, pp. 218-234.
2. A. Agostini, G. DeMichelis, A light workflow management system using simple process models, Int. J. Collab. Comp. [16] 335-363.
3. C. Beckstein, J. Klausner, A planning framework for workflow management, in Proceedings of Workshop Intelligent Workflow and Process Management, Stockholm, 1999.
4. Casati F., Ceri S., Paraboschi S., Pozzi G. Specification and implementation of exceptions in workflow management systems. ACM TODS. 24(3):1999;405-451.
5. Casati F., Ceri S., Pernici B., Pozzi G. Workflow evolution. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 24(3):1998;211-238.
6. Chiu D., Li Q., Karlapalem K. Web interface-driven cooperative exception handling in ADOME. Informations Systems. 26(2):2001;93-120.
7. Edmond D., ter Hofstede A.H.M. A reflective infrastructure for workflow adaptability. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 34(3):2000;271-304.
8. C. Ellis, K. Keddara, A workflow change is a workflow, in: BPM '00, LNCS, vol. 1806, 2000, pp. 516-534.
9. C.A. Ellis, K. Keddara, G. Rozenberg, Dynamic change within workflow systems, in: Proceedings of International ACM Conference COOCS '95, Milpitas, CA, August 1995, pp. 10-21.
10. C.A. Ellis, C. Maltzahn, The Chautauqua workflow system, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on System Science, Maui, HI, 1997.
11. Genrich H.J., Thiagarajan P.S. A theory of bipolar synchronization schemes. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 30(3):1984;241-318.
12. P. Heimann, G. Joeris, C. Krapp, B. Westfechtel, DYNAMITE: dynamic task nets for software process management, in: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference Software Engineering (ICSE), Berlin, March 1996, pp. 331-341.
13. G. Joeris, O. Herzog, Managing evolving workflow specifications, in: Proceedings of International Conference on CoopIS '98, New York City, 1998, pp. 310-321.
14. B. Kiepuszewski, Expressiveness and suitability of languages for control flow modelling in workflows, Ph.D. Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2002. Available from 〈http://www.tm.tue.nl/it/research/ patterns〉.
15. B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, C.J. Bussler, On structured workflow modelling, in: CAiSE'00, LNCS, vol. 1789, 2000, pp. 431-445.
16. Klein M., Dellarocas C., Bernstein A. Int. J. Collab. Comp. 9(3-4):2000;346-456. (Special issue on adaptive workflow systems).
17. Kochut K., Arnold J., Sheth A., Miller J., Kraemer E., Arpinar B., Cardoso J. IntelliGEN: a distributed workflow system for discovering protein-protein interactions. Distrib. Parallel Databases. 13(1):2003;43-72.
18. M. Kradolfer, A. Geppert, Dynamic workflow schema evolution based on workflow type versioning and workflow migration, in: CoopIS '99, Edinburgh, 1999, pp. 104-114.
19. C. Liu, R. Conradi, Automatic replanning of task networks for process model evolution, in: Proceedings of European Software Engineers Conference, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 1993, pp. 434-450.
20. R. Müller, Event-oriented dynamic adaptation of workflows. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leipzig, Germany, 2002.
21. flex-supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. JIIS. 10(2):1998;93-129.
22. M. Reichert, S. Rinderle, P. Dadam, On the common support of workflow type and instance changes under correctness constraints, in: CoopIS '03, LNCS, vol. 2888, Catania, Italy, 2003, pp. 407-425.
23. Rinderle S., Reichert M., Dadam P. Evaluation of correctness criteria for dynamic workflow changes. BPM'03. LNCS. vol. 2678:2003;41-57 Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
24. S. Rinderle, M. Reichert, P. Dadam, Flexible support of team processes by adaptive workflow systems, Distribut. Parallel Databases 2004 (to appear).
25. S. Sadiq, Handling dynamic schema changes in workflow processes, in: Proceedings of the 11th Australian Database Conference 2000.
26. Sadiq S., Marjanovic O., Orlowska M. Managing change and time in dynamic workflow processes. IJCIS. 9(1-2):2000;93-116.
27. Aalst W.M.P.v.d. Exterminating the dynamic change bug: a concrete approach to support worfklow change. Inform. Syst. Frontiers. 3(3):2001;297-317.
28. Aalst W.M.P.v.d., Basten T. Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change. Theoret Comp. Sci. 270(1-2):2002;125-203.
29. Aalst W.M.P.v.d., Weske M., Wirtz G. Advanced topics in workflow management: Issues, requirements, and solutions. Int. J. Integrat. Design Process Sci. 7(3):2003.
30. W.M.P.v.d. Aalst, P. Berens, Beyond workflow management: product-driven case handling, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Supp. Group Work, New York, 2001, pp. 42-51.
31. W.M.P.v.d. Aalst, S. Jablonski (Eds.), Flexible workflow technology driving the networked economy, Int. Comp. Syst.: Sci. Eng. 15 (5) (2000).
32. H.M.W. Verbeek, W.M.P.v.d. Aalst, Woflan 2.0 A petri-net-based workflow diagnosis tool, in: ICATPN '00, LNCS, vol. 1825, pp. 455-464, Aarhus, June 2000.
33. M. Weske, Workflow management systems: Formal foundation, Conceptual design, implementation aspects, University of Münster, Germany, 2000. Habilitation Thesis.
34. M. Weske, Formal foundation and conceptual design of dynamic adaptations in a workflow management system, in: HICSS-34, 2001.