Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 58-67

  Joseph, Sindhu ^b   Prakken, Henry ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Deductive coherence; Norm deliberation; Normative agents

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION MODEL; ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; COHERENCE MODELS; DIALOGUE PROTOCOLS; NORMATIVE AGENTS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 70450177930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1568234.1568242     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. A. Amaya. Inference to the best legal explanation. In H. Kaptein, H. Prakken, and B. Verheij, editors, Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, 2009.
2. L. Amgoud and H. Prade. Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence, 34:197-216, 2009.
3. K. Atkinson. What Should We Do?: Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 2005.
4. T. Bench-Capon and H. Prakken. Justifying actions by accruing arguments. In P. Dunne and T. Bench-Capon, editors, Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2006, pages 247-258, Amsterdam etc, 2006. IOS Press.
5. T. Bench-Capon and G. Sartor. A quantitative approach to theory coherence. In B. Verheij, A. Lodder, R. Loui, and A. Muntjewerff, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2001: The Fourteenth Annual Conference, pages 53-62, Amsterdam etc, 2001. IOS Press.
6. J. Broersen, M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, and L. van der Torre. Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly Journal, 2:428-447, 2002.
7. A. Casali, L. Godo, and C. Sierra. Graded BDI models for agent architectures. In Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA V), volume 3487 of LNAI, pages 126-143, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005. Springer.
8. R. Conte, C. Castelfranchi, and F. Dignum. Autonomous norm acceptance. In ATAL '98: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents V, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, volume 1555 of LNCS, pages 99-112, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1999. Springer.
9. P. Dellunde and L. Godo. Introducing grades in deontic logics. In DEON '08: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, volume 5076 of LNAI, pages 248-262, berlin/Heidelberg, 2008. Springer.
10. P. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
11. F. Giunchiglia and L. Serafini. Multilanguage hierarchical logics, or: how we can do without modal logics. Artificial Intelligence, 65:29-70, 1994.
12. T. Gordon. The Pleadings Game: an exercise in computational dialectics. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2:239-292, 1994.
13. S. Joseph, C. Sierra, and M. Schorlemmer. A coherence based framework for institutional agents. In Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems III, volume 4870 of LNCS, pages 287-300, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2008. Springer.
14. S. Joseph, C. Sierra, M. Schorlemmer, and P. Dellunde. Formalising deductive coherence: An application to norm evaluation. In Normas'08(Extended version), Technical Report(RR-IIIA-2008-02), 2009. http://www.iiia.csic.es/ sierra/papers/2009/Coherence.pdf.
15. R. Loui. Process and policy: resource-bounded non-demonstrative reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 14:1-38, 1998.
16. P. Pasquier and B. Chaib-draa. The cognitive coherence approach for agent communication pragmatics. In AAMAS '03: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 544-551. ACM, 2003.
17. P. Pasquier, I. Rahwan, F. Dignum, and L. Sonenberg. Argumentation and persuasion in the cognitive coherence theory. In P. Dunne and T. Bench-Capon, editors, Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2006, pages 223-234, Amsterdam etc, 2006. IOS Press.
18. H. Prakken. A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 85-94, New York, 2005. ACM Press.
19. I. Rahwan, S. Ramchurn, N. Jennings, P. McBurney, S. Parsons, and L. Sonenberg. Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18:343-375, 2003.
20. A. S. Rao and M. Georgeff. BDI agents: From theory to practice. In ICMAS-95, First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems: Proceedings, pages 312-319, S. Francisco, CA, 1995. MIT Press.
21. P. Thagard. Coherence in Thought and Action. MIT Press, 2002.
22. P. Thagard. Causal inference in legal decision making: Explanatory coherence vs. Bayesian networks. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18:231-249, 2004.
23. D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.