Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 144, Issue , 2006, Pages 247-258

  Bench Capon, Trevor J M ^a   Prakken, Henry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

argumentation; choice; goals; Practical reasoning; values

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; CHOICE; GOAL; INFERENCE RULES; LOGICAL FORMALIZATION; PRACTICAL REASONING; REASONING ABOUT ACTIONS; SET OF RULES; SUBGOALS; VALUE;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84940556153     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aristotle. Topics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997. Translated by R. Smith.
2. A.J.P. Kenny. Practical reasoning and rational appetite. In J. Raz, editor, Practical Reasoning, pages 63-80. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1978.
3. D.N. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.
4. K. Atkinson. What Should We Do: Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 2005.
5. H. Prakken. A study of accrual of arguments,with applications to evidential reasoning. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 85-94, New York, 2005. ACM Press.
6. P.M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
7. J.L. Pollock. Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
8. G.A.W. Vreeswijk. Abstract argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence, 90:225-279, 1997.
9. J.R. Searle. Rationality in Action. MIT Press, Cambridge,MA, 2001.
10. T.J.M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13:429-448, 2003.
11. L. Amgoud. A unified setting for inference and decision: an argumentation-based approach. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-2005 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, pages 40-43, 2005.
12. R.H. Thomason. Desires and defaults: a framework for planning with inferred goals. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 702-713, San Fransisco, CA, 2000. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
13. J. Broersen, M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, and L. van der Torre. Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly Journal, 2:428-447, 2002.
14. M.B. van Riemsdijk, M. Dastani, and J.-J. Ch. Meyer. Semantics of declarative goals in agent programming. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-05), pages 133-140, 2005.
15. J.L. Pollock. The logical foundations of goal-regression planning in autonomous agents. Artificial Intelligence, 106:267-335, 1998.