Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support system

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 177-184

  Zeleznikow, John ^a   Abrahams, Brooke ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

BATNAs; Bayesian belief networks; Integrative negotiation; Multi agent systems; Negotiation supports systems

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; FAMILY LAW; MULTI-AGENT; MULTIAGENT NEGOTIATION; NEGOTIATION SUPPORT; NEGOTIATION SUPPORT SYSTEM; OBJECTIVE MEASURE; SYSTEM USE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION THEORY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 70450162463     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1568234.1568254     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Zeleznikow, J., Meersman, R., Hunter, D. and van Helvoort, E. 1995. Computer tools for aiding legal negotiation. ACIS95 - Sixth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia: 231-251.
2. Kersten, G. E. and Noronha, S. J. 1997. Supporting International Negotiations with a WWW-based System, Interim Report, IIASA, Austria.
3. Yuan, Y., Rose, B. J., Archer, N. and Suarga, H. (1998) A Web-Based Negotiation Support System, EM - Electronic Markets, 8.
4. Eidelman, J.A. 1993. Software for Negotiations, Law Practice Management, 19(7): 50-55.
5. Lodder, A. and Zeleznikow, J. 2009. Enhanced Dispute Resolution through the use of Information Technology. In press, Cambridge University Press.
6. Brams, S. J. and Taylor, A. D., (1996). Fair Division, from cake cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Thiessen, E. M. and McMahon, J. P. 2000. Beyond Win- Win in Cyberspace. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 15: 643.
8. Bellucci, E and Zeleznikow, J. 2006. Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems that support mediators: a case study of the Family-Winner system, Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13(2), 233-271.
9. Alexander, R. 1997. Family mediation: Friend or Foe for Women. 10: 1 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 8(4): 255.
10. McEwen, C., Rogers, N. and Maiman, R. 1995. Bring in the Lawyers: Challenging the Dominant Approaches to Ensuring Fairness in Divorce Mediation, Minnesota Law Review 79: 1317-1412.
11. Phegan, R. 1995. The Family Mediation System: An Art of Distributions McGill Law.Journal 40: 365.
12. Fisher, R. and Ury, W. 1981. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, Boston.
13. Toulmin, S. 1958, The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
14. Lodder, A. and Zeleznikow, J. 2005. Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Systems in a Three Step Model. The Harvard Negotiation Law Review. 10: 287-338.
15. Walton, R. and Mckersie, R. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations, McGraw - Hill, New York.
16. Kersten, G. 2001. Modeling Distributive and Integrative Negotiations. Review and Revised Characterization. Group Decision and Negotiation. 10(6), 493-514.
17. Lax, D. A. and Sebenius, J. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator. New York, The Free Press.
18. Mnookin, R. H. and Kornhauser, L. 1979, Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce, Yale Law Journal 88, 950-997.
19. Bibas, S. 2004. Plea bargaining outside the shadow of the trial, Harvard Law Review 117, 2464-2547.
20. Zeleznikow, J. and Bellucci, E. 2006. Family-Mediator - adding notions of fairness to those of interests. Proceedings of Nineteenth International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based System. IOS Publications, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 121-130.
21. Kraus, S. 2001. Strategic Negotiation in Multi-Agent Environments, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, USA.
22. Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C. and Wooldridge, M. 2000. Automated haggling: Building artificial negotiators. In Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, page 1.
23. Kraus, S., Hoz-Weiss, P., Wilkenfeld, J., Andersen, D. and Pate, A. 2008. Resolving crises through automated bilateral negotiations. Artificial Intelligence journal, 172(1): 1- 18.
24. Russell, S. J. and Norvig, P. 2003. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. Abrahams, B. and Zeleznikow, J. 2008. Asset Negotiation in Trade-Off Support with a Multi-Agent Environment. Proceedings of First International Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation (HUCOM 2008), K. Hindriks and W. Brinkman (eds.), Delft, Netherlands, December 8-9 2008, ISBN 978-90-813811-1-6, 4-10.
26. Abrahams, B. and Zeleznikow, J. 2008. A Multi-Agent Architecture for Online Dispute Resolution Services, Expanding the Horizons of ODR: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution, M. Poblet (ed.) CEUR Workshop Proceedings Series (CEURWS. org), Vol. 430, Florence, Italy, December 13 2008, 51-61.
27. Muecke, N., Stranieri, A. and Miller, C. 2008 Re- Consider: The Integration of Online Dispue Resolution and Decision Support Systems, Expanding the Horizons of ODR: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution, M. Poblet (ed.) CEUR Workshop Proceedings Series (CEUR-WS.org), Vol. 430, Florence, Italy, December 13 2008, 62-72.
28. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M. and Lewis, B. 1999. A hybrid-neural approach to the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family.
29. Bellucci, E. 2008. Development of a Mediation Tool in Family Law: AssetDivider, Proceedings of JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference, IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands: 88-97.