Blind decomposition of low-dimensional multi-spectral image by sparse component analysis

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 590-597

  Kopriva, Ivica ^a   Cichocki, Andrzej ^b,c  

^a RUDER BO KOVI INSTITUTE   (Croatia)

^b RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cell imaging; Chemical imaging; Factorization; Multi spectral imaging; Nonnegative matrix; Sparse component analysis

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MATRIX FACTORIZATION;

ALTERNATING LEAST SQUARES; BLIND DECOMPOSITION; CELL IMAGING; CHEMICAL IMAGING; LOW DIMENSIONAL; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGING; NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX; NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; SPARSE COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION;

EID: 70450159554     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1257     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams JB, Smith MO. Spectral mixture modeling: a new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 suite. J. Geophys. Res. 1986; 91: 8098-8112.
2. Settle JJ, Drake NA. Linear mixing and estimation of ground cover proportions. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1993; 14: 1159-1177.
3. Chang C-I, Chiang S-S, Smith JA, Ginsberg IW. Linear spectral random mixture analysis for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 2002; 40: 375-392.
4. Du Q, Kopriva I, Szu H. Independent-component analysis for hyper-spectral remote sensing imagery classification. Opt. Eng. 2006; 45: 017008: 1-13.
5. Du Q, Kopriva I. Automated target detection and discrimination using constrained kurtosis maximization. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2008; 5: 38-42.
6. Stein DWJ, Beaven SG, Hoff LE, Winter EM, Schaum AP, Stocker AD. Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2002; 19: 58-69.
7. Zavattini G, Vecchi S, Mitchell G, Weisser U, Leahy RM, Pichler BJ, Smith DJ, Cherry SJ. A hyperspectral fluorescence system for 3D in vivo optical imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006; 51: 2029-2043.
8. Kopriva I, Persin A, Zorc H, Lipozencic J, Pasic A, Kostovic K, Loncaric M. M.Visualization of basal cell carcinoma by fluorescence diagnosis and independent component analysis. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 2007; 4: 190-196.
9. Hyvarinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E. Independent Component Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, US, 2001.
10. Cichocki A, Amari S. Adaptive Blind Signal and Image Processing. John Wiley: New York, 2002.
11. Jutten C, Herault J. Blind separation of sources, part I: an adaptive algorithmbased on neuromimetic architecture. Sig. Proc. 1991;24: 1-10.
12. Comon P. Independent component analysis-a new concept? Sig.Proc. 1994; 36: 287-314.
13. Cardoso JF, Soulomniac A. Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. Proc. IEE F 1993; 140: 362-370.
14. Nascimento JMP, Bioucas Dias JM. Does independent component analysis play a role in unmixing hyperspectral data? IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 2005; 43: 175-187.
15. Nascimento JMP, Bioucas Dias JM. Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 2005; 43: 898-910.
16. Li Y, Cichocki A, Amari S. Analysis of sparse representation and blind source separation. Neural Comput. 2004; 16: 1193-1234.
17. Li Y, Amari S, Cichocki A, Ho DWC, Xie S. Underdetermined blind source separation based on sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2006; 54: 423-437.
18. Naini FM, Mohimani GH, Babaie-Zadeh M, Jutten C. Estimating the mixing matrix in sparse component analysis (SCA) based on partial k-dimensional subspace clustering. Neurocomputing 2008; 71: 2330-2343.
19. Chan TH, Ma WK, Chi Ch Y, Wang Y. A convex analysis framework for blind separation of non-negative sources. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2008; 56: 5120-5134.
20. Lee DD, Seung HS. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 1999; 401: 788-791.
21. Cichocki A, Zdunek R, Amari S. Nonnegative matrix and tensor factorization. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2008; 25: 142-145.
22. Zdunek R, Cichocki A. Nonnegative matrix factorization with constrained second-order optimization. Sig. Proc. 2008; 87: 1904-1916.
23. Cichocki A, Zdunek R, Amari SI. Hierarchical ALS algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization and 3D tensor factorization. LNCS 2007; 4666: 169-176.
24. Cichocki A, Phan A-H, Zdunek R, Zhang L-Q. Flexible component analysis for sparse, smooth, nonnagative coding or representation. LNCS 2008; 4984: 811-820.
25. Cichocki A, Zdunek R, Phan AH, Amari S. Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorization. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: New York, US, 2009.
26. Cichocki A, Zdunek R. Multilayer nonnegative matrix factorization. Electron. Lett. 2006; 42: 947-948.
27. Levina E, Wagaman AS, Callender AF, Mandair GS, Morris MD. Estimating the number of pure chemical components in a mixture by maximum likelihood. J. Chemometr. 2007; 21: 24-34.
28. Malinowski ER. Determination of the number of factors and experimental error in a data matrix. Anal. Chem. 1977; 49: 612-617.
29. Chang CI, Du Q. Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 2004; 42: 608-619.
30. Bofill P, Zibulevsky M. Underdetermined blind source separation using sparse representations. Sig. Proc. 2001; 81: 2353-2362.
31. Takigawa I, Kudo M, Toyama J. Performance analysis of minimum l1- norm solutions for underdetermined source separation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2004; 52: 582-591.
32. Donoho DL, Elad M. Optimally sparse representation in general (non-orthogonal) dictionaries via l1 minimization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2003; 100: 2197-2202.
33. Kim SJ, Koh K, Lustig M, Boyd S, Gorinevsky S. An interior-pointmethod for large-scale '1-regularized least squares. IEEE J. Selected Topics Sig. Proc. 2007; 1: 606-617.
34. Tropp JA, Gilbert AC. Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007; 53: 4655-4666.
35. Figuiredo MAT, Nowak RD, Wright SJ. Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems. IEEE J. Selected Topics Sig. Proc. 2007; 1: 586-597.
36. Kopriva I, Peršin A. Unsupervised decomposition of low-intensity low-dimensional multi-spectral fluorescent images for tumour demar-cation. Med. Image Anal. 2009; 13: 507-518.
37. http://www.stanford.edu/boyd/l1_ls/
38. Van Den Berg E, Friedlander MP. Probing the pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2008; 31: 890-912.
39. Koenig F, Knittel J, Stepp H. Diagnostic cancer in vivo. Science 2001; 292: 1401-1403.
40. Luengo D, Santamaria I, Vielva L. A general solution to blind inverse problems for sparse input signal. Neurocomputing 2005; 69: 198-215.
41. Georgiev P, Theis F, Cichocki A. Sparse component analysis and blind source separation of underdetermined mixtures. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2005; 16: 992-996.
42. Ericson MB, Sandberg C, Gudmundson F, RosénA,LarkoO,Wennberg AM. Fluorescence contrast and threshold limit: implications for photodynamic diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. J. Photochem. Photo-biol. B: Biol. 2003; 69: 121-127.
43. Scott MA, Hopper C, Sahota A, Springett R, Mcllroy BW, Bown SG, MacRobert AJ. Fluorescence photodiagnostics and photobleaching studies of cancerous lesions using ratio imaging and spectroscopic techniques. Lasers Med Sci 2000; 15: 63-72.