Toxicity of ivermectin on cladocerans: Comparison of toxic effects on Daphnia and Ceriodaphnia species

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2160-2166

  Lopes, Christelle ^a,b,c   Charles, Sandrine ^a,b,c   Vollat, Bernard ^d   Garric, Jeanne ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d Ctr Natl Machinisme Agric G   (France)

Author keywords

Aquatic invertebrates; Chronic toxicity; Interspecies intraspecies comparisons; Veterinary pharmaceuticals

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES; AQUATIC ORGANISMS; CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; CHRONIC EFFECTS; CHRONIC TOXICITY; CLADOCERAN SPECIES; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA; DAPHNIDS; EFFECT CONCENTRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; IVERMECTIN; LIFE HISTORY; SEX RATIOS; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; TOXIC EFFECT; VETERINARY PHARMACEUTICALS;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; AQUACULTURE; IMPURITIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRAIN; TOXICITY;

DRUG PRODUCTS;

IVERMECTIN; SURFACE WATER;

CRUSTACEAN; DRUG; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ECTOPARASITE; EXCRETION; GROWTH RATE; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; IVERMECTIN; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; SEX RATIO; SURVIVAL; TOXICITY TEST;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; CHRONIC TOXICITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAPHNIA; DATA ANALYSIS; ECOTOXICITY; ECTOPARASITE; ENDOPARASITE; GENETIC DIFFERENCE; GROWTH; LIFE HISTORY; LIVESTOCK; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL;

ANIMALS; CLADOCERA; DAPHNIA; IVERMECTIN; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TOXICITY TESTS;

CERIODAPHNIA; CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA; DAPHNIIDAE; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 70449844035     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/08-607.1     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Newman MC, Ownby DR, Mézin LCA, Powell DC, Christensen TRL, Lerberg SB, Anderson B-A. 2000. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:508-515.
2. Versteeg DJ, Stalmans M, Dyer SD, Janssen C. 1997. Ceriodaphnia and Daphnia: A comparison of their sensitivity to xenobiotics and utility as a test species. Chemosphere 34:869-892. (Pubitemid 27117426)
3. Garric J, Vollat B, Duis K, Péry A, Junker T, Ramil M, Fink G, Ternes TA. 2007. Effects of the parasiticide ivermectin on the cladoceran Daphnia magna and the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Chemosphere 69:903-910. (Pubitemid 47411657)
4. Oda S, Tatarazako N, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T. 2006. Genetic differences in the production of male neonates in Daphnia magna exposed to juvenile hormone analogs. Chemosphere 63: 1477-1484.
5. Daughton CG, Ternes TA. 1999. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Agents of subtle change? Special report. Environ Health Perspect 107:907-938.
6. Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LR, Buxton HT. 2002. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: A national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202-1211.
7. Davies IM, Rodger GK. 2000. A review of the use of ivermectin as a treatment for sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis [Kroyer] and Caligus elongates [Nordmann]) infestation in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J Econ Entomol 83:710-714.
8. Laffont CM, Toutain PL, Alvinerie M, Bousquet-Melou A. 2002. Intestinal secretion is a major route for parent ivermectin elimination in the rat. Drug Metab Disp 30:626-630. (Pubitemid 34579093)
9. Halley BA, Jacob TA, Lu AYH. 1989. The environmental impact of the use of ivermectin: Environmental effects and fate. Chemosphere 18:1543-1563. (Pubitemid 19173958)
10. Gunn A, Sadd JW. 1994. The effect of ivermectin on the survival, behaviour and cocoon production of the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Pedobiologia 38:327-333. (Pubitemid 2121930)
11. Boxall AB, Fogg LA, Blackwell PA, Kay P, Pemberton EJ, Croxford A. 2004. Veterinary medicines in the environment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 180:1-91.
12. Campbell WC, Fisher MH, Stapley EO, Albers-Schonberg G, Jacob TA. 1983. Ivermectin: A new antiparasitic agent. Science 221:823-828.
13. Edwards CA, Atiyeh RM, Römbke J. 2001. Environmental impact of avermectins. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 171:111-137.
14. Jensen J, Krogh PH, Sverdrup LE. 2003. Effects of the antibacterial agents tiamulin, olanquindox and metronidazole and the anthelmintic ivermectin on the soil invertebrate species Folsomia fimetario (Collembola) and Enchytraeus crypticus (Enchytraeidae). Chemosphere 50:437-443. (Pubitemid 36083031)
15. Diao X, Jensen J, Duus Hansen A. 2007. Toxicity of the anthelmintic abamectin to four species of soil invertebrates. Environ Pollut 148:514-519. (Pubitemid 46818650)
16. Davies IM, Gillibrand PA, Mc Henery JG, Rae GH. 1998. Environmental risk of ivermectin to sediment dwelling organisms. Aquaculture 163:29-46.
17. Allen YT, Thain JE, Haworth S, Barry J. 2007. Development and application of long-term sublethal whole sediment tests with Arenicola marina and Corophium volutator using ivermectin as the test compound. Environ Pollut 146:92-99. (Pubitemid 46161925)
18. Sanderson H, Laird B, Pope L, Brain R, Wilson C, Johnson D, Bryning G, Peregrine AS, Boxall A, Solomon K. 2007. Assessment of the environmental fate and effects of ivermectin in aquatic mesocosms. Aquat Toxicol 85:229-240. (Pubitemid 350100903)
19. Elendt BP, Bias WR. 1990. Trace nutrient deficiency in Daphnia magna cultured in standard medium for toxicity testing: Effects of the optimization of culture conditions on life-history parameters of D. magna. Water Res 24:1157-1167.
20. Agence Française de Normalisation. 2000. Water quality: Determination of chronic toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia. Population growth inhibition test. NF T 90376. Paris, France.
21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1998. Guideline for testing of chemicals. Daphnia magna reproduction test. TG 211. Paris, France.
22. Billoir E, Delignette-Muller M-L, Péry ARR, Charles S. 2008. A Bayesian approach to analyzing ecotoxicological data. Environ Sci Technol 42:8978-8984.
23. R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
24. Baird DJ, Barber I, Calow P. 1990. Clonal variation in general responses of Daphnia magna Straus to toxic stress. I. Chronic life history effects. Funct Ecol 4:399-407.
25. Baird DJ, Barber I, Bradley M, Soares AMVM, Calow P. 1991. A comparative study of genotype sensitivity to acute toxic stress using clones of Daphnia magna Straus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 21: 257-265.
26. Soares AMVM, Baird DJ, Calow P. 1992. Interclonal variation in performance of Daphnia magna Straus in chronic bioassays. Environ Toxicol Chem 11:1477-1483.
27. Barata C, Baird DJ, Miňarro A, Soares AMVM. 2000. Do genotype responses always converge from lethal to nonlethal toxicant exposure levels? Hypothesis tested using clones of Daphnia magna Straus. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2314-2322.
28. Kiffney PM, Clements WH. 1996. Size-dependent response of macroinvertebrates to metals in experimental streams. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:1352-1356. (Pubitemid 26295747)
29. Hutchinson TH, Solbé J, Kloepper-Sams PJ. 1998. Analysis of the ECETOC aquatic toxicity (EAT) database. III. Comparative toxicity of chemical substances to different life stages of aquatic organisms. Chemosphere 36:129-142.
30. Lopes C, Péry ARR, Chaumot A, Charles S. 2005. Ecotoxicology and population dynamics: On the use of DEBtox models in a Leslie modeling approach. Ecol Model 188:30-40. (Pubitemid 41414629)
31. Bossuyt BTA, Janssen CR. 2005. Copper toxicity to different field-collected cladoceran species: Intra- and inter-species sensitivity. Environ Pollut 136:145-154.
32. Muyssen BTA, Bossuyt BTA, Janssen CR. 2005. Inter- and intra-species variation in acute zinc tolerance of field-collected cladoceran populations. Chemosphere 61:1159-1167.
33. Marchini S, Hoglund MD, Broderius SJ, Tosato ML. 1993. Comparison of the susceptibility of daphnids and fish to benzene derivatives. Sci Total Environ 1(Suppl):799-808. (Pubitemid 24043396)
34. Liebig M, Alonso Fernandez A, Blübaum-Gronau E, Boxall A, Brinke M, Egeler P, Fenner K, Fink G, Garric J, Halling-Sørensen B, Jensen J, Knacker T, Krogh KA, Küster A, Löffler D, Moldan N, Pope L, Prasse C, Römbke J, Rönnefahrt I, Sanchez Argüello P, Schneider MK, Tarazona JV, Ternes TA, Traunspurger W, Wehrhan A, Duis K. 2010. Environmental risk assessment of ivermectin - A case study. Integr Environ Assess Manag (in press).
35. Kleiven OT, Larsson P, Hobaek A. 1992. Sexual reproduction in Daphnia magna requires three stimuli. Oikos 62:197-206. (Pubitemid 23397395)
36. Waddy SL, Burridge LE, Hamilton MN, Mercer SM, Aiken DE, Haya K. 2002. Emamectin benzoate induces molting in American lobster, Homarus americanus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1096-1099.
37. Flaherty CM, Dodson SI. 2005. Effects of pharmaceuticals on Daphnia survival, growth, and reproduction. Chemosphere 61:200-207.
38. Deecher DC, Brezner J, Tanenbaum SW. 1990. Sublethal effects of avermectin and milbemycin on the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J Econ Entomol 83:710-714.
39. Kooijman SALM, Bedaux JJM. 1996. The Analysis of Aquatic Toxicity Data. VU University Press, Amsterdam, p 149.
40. Billoir E, Da Silva Ferrão-Filho A, Delignette-Muller ML, Charles S. 2009. DEBtox theory and matrix population models as helpful tools in understanding the interaction between toxic cyanobacteria and zooplankton. J Theor Biol 258:380-388.
41. Charles S, Billoir E, Lopes C, Chaumot A. 2009. Matrix population models as relevant modeling tools in ecotoxicology. In Devillers J, eds, Ecotoxicology Modeling. Springer, New York, NY, USA, p 400 (in press).