Student-initiated advice in academic supervision

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 163-190

  Vehviläinen, Sanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449578733     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08351810902864560     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ahrio, L. (1997). Kenen vastuulla? Tutkimus pro gradu-tutkielmien ohjaamisesta. Tampereen yliopiston opintotoimisto. Tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 38. Tampereen yliopisto.[Whose responsibility? A study on the supervision of master's theses]. University of Tampere, Student affairs Reports 28. University of Tampere.
2. Aittola, H., & Ylijoki, O-H.(Eds.) (2005). Tulosohjattua autonomiaa. Akateemisen työn muuttuvat käytännöt. [Autonomy steered by performance. Changing practices of the academic work.] Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
3. Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
4. Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro, M. (2008). Clients'responses to therapist's re-interpretations. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar. (Eds.) Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 77-108) Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bergmann, J. (1992) Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 137-163). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Björk, L., Bräuer, G., Rienecker, L., Ruhmann, G., & Stray Jørgensen, P. (Eds.) (2003). Teaching academic writing across Europe. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2003). Supervising the PhD: A guide to success. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
8. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Erickson, F.,& Schultz, J. (1982). Counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press.
10. Erikson, I., & Mikkonen J. (2003). Opiskelun ohjaus yliopistossa. [Supervision of studies in the university]. Helsinki: Edita.
11. Goldsmith, D. J. (2000). Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat. Communications Monographs, 67, 1-19.
12. Goldsmith, D. (2004). Communicating social support. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Goldsmith, D., & Fitch, C. (1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human Communication Research, 23, 454-476.
14. Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T., & Alho, I. (Eds). (2004). Iso suomen kielioppi. [Comprehensive grammar of Finnish.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
15. He, A. W. (1994). Withholding academic advice: Institutional context and discourse practice. Discourse Processes, 18, 297-316.
16. Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.) Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 161-182). London: Sage.
17. Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 359-417). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1992). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a troubles-telling; and a service encounter;. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 521-548). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
20. Kinnell, A-M. K., & Maynard, D. (1996). The delivery and receipt of safer sex advice in pretest counselling sessions for HIV and AIDS. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24, 405-437.
21. Leppänen, V. (1998). The straightforwardness of advice: Advice-giving in interactions between Swedish district nurses and patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 209-239.
22. Nummenmaa, A. R., Lairio, M., Korhonen, V., & Eerola, S. (Eds.) (2005). Ohjaus yliopiston oppimisympäristöissä. [Guidance in academic learning environments] Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.
23. Penttinen, L. (2005). Gradupuhetta tutkielmaseminaarissa. [Thesis discourse in an undergraduate research seminar] Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 269.
24. Peräkylä, A. (2008). Conversation analysis and psychoanalysis: Interpretation, affect and intersubjectivity. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar. (Eds.) Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. (pp. 170-202) Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (1999). Asking elaborate questions: Focus groups and the management of spontaneity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3, 314-335.
26. Pudlinski, C. (2002). Accepting and rejecting advice as competent peers: Caller dilemmas on a warm line. Discourse Studies, 4, 481-500.
27. Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social interaction: Yes/no type interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.
28. Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures in conversation. Volumes 1 & 2. (G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
29. Sandlund, E. S. (2004). Feeling by doing: The social organization of everyday emotions in academic talk-in-interaction. (Doctoral dissertation, Karlstad University, 2004). Karlstad University Studies, 36.
30. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Silverman, D. (1997). Discourses of counselling. HIV counselling as social interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Tracy K. (1997). Colloquium: Dilemmas of academic discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33. Välimaa, J. (2001). Analyzing massification and globalisation. In J. Välimaa (Ed.), Finnish higher education in transition (pp. 55-72). Jyväskylä, Finland: Institute for Educational Research.
34. Vehviläinen, S. (1999). Structures of counselling interaction. A conversation analytic study of counselling encounters in career guidance training. Disseratation, University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
35. Vehviläinen, S. (2001). Evaluative advice in educational counseling: The use of disagreement in the;stepwise entry; to advice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 371-398.
36. Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Avoiding providing solutions: Orienting to the ideal of students' self-directedness in counselling interaction. Discourse Studies, 5, 389-414.
37. Vehviläinen, S. (2009). Problems in the research problem: Criticism and resistance in master's thesis supervision encoun- ters. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 6, 185-201.
38. Waring, H. Z. (2002). Expressing non-comprehension in a graduate seminar. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1711-1731.
39. Waring, H. Z. (2005). Peer tutoring in a graduate writing center: Identity, expertise and advice resisting. Applied Linguistics, 26, 141-168.
40. Waring, H. Z. (2007). Complex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetries. Text and Talk, 27, 11, 107-137.
41. Waring, H. Z. (2007). The multi-functionality of accounts in advice giving. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 367-369.