Misunderstanding and misrepresentation: A reply to Hutchison and Schagen

International Journal of Research and Method in Education

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-12

  Gorard, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449564799     PISSN: 1743727X     EISSN: 17437288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17437270902749197     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cook, T., and S. Gorard. 2007. What counts and what should count as evidence. In Evidence in education: Linking research and policy, ed. OECD, 33-49. Paris: OECD.
2. Gorard, S. 2000. 'Underachievement' is still an ugly word: Reconsidering the relative effectiveness of schools in England and Wales. Journal of Education Policy 15, no. 5: 559-73.
3. Gorard, S. 2003a. In defence of a middle way: A reply to Plewis and Fielding. British Journal of Educational Studies 51, no. 4: 420-6.
4. Gorard, S. 2003b. Quantitative methods in social science: The role of numbers made easy.London: Continuum.
5. Gorard, S. 2006a. Towards a judgement-based statistical analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education 27, no. 1: 67-80.
6. Gorard, S. 2006b. Value-added is of little value. Journal of Education Policy 21, no. 2: 233-41.
7. Gorard, S. 2007. The dubious benefits of multi-level modelling. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30, no. 2: 221-36.
8. Gorard, S. 2008a. Research impact is not always a good thing: A re-consideration of rates of 'social mobility' in Britain. British Journal of Sociology of Education 29, no. 3: 317-24.
9. Gorard, S. 2008b. The value-added of primary schools: What is it really measuring? Educational Review 60, no. 2: 179-85.
10. Gorard, S. 2008c. Which students are missing from HE? Cambridge Journal of Education 38, no. 3: 421-37.
11. Gorard, S., and J. Fitz. 2006. What counts as evidence in the school choice debate? British Educational Research Journal 32, no. 6: 797-816.
12. Gorard, S., B.H. See, and E. Smith. 2008. The impact of SES on participation and attainment in science: A review of available data. London: Royal Society.
13. Gorard, S., C. Taylor, and J. Fitz. 2003. Schools, markets and choice policies. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14. Gorard, S., with C. Taylor. 2004. Combining methods in educational and social research. London: Open University Press.
15. Hutchison, D. 2003. The effect of group-level influences in pupils' progress in reading. British Educational Research Journal 29, no. 1: 25-40.
16. Hutchison, D., and I. Schagen. 2008. Concorde and discord: The art of multilevel modelling. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 31, no. 1: 11-18.
17. Noden, P., and H. Goldstein. 2007. A brief response to Gorard and Fitz. British Educational Research Journal 33, no. 2: 273-4.
18. Plewis, I., and A. Fielding. 2003. What is multi-level modelling for? A critical response to Gorard (2003). British Journal of Educational Studies 53, no. 4: 408-19.
19. Schagen, I. 2006. The use of standardized residuals to derive value-added measures of school performance. Educational Studies 32, no. 2: 119-32.
20. Schagen, I., and S. Schagen. 2005. Combining multi-level analysis with national value-added data sets: A cases study to explore the effects of school diversity. British Educational Research Journal 31, no. 3: 309-28.
21. Sloane, F., and S. Gorard. 2003. Exploring methodological aspects of design experiments. Educational Researcher 32, no. 1: 29-31, 35-7.
22. Taylor, C., and S. Gorard. 2001. The role of residence in school segregation: Placing the impact of parental choice in perspective. Environment and Planning A 30, no. 10: 1829-52.