Academic achievement and perceptions of the learning environment in virtual and traditional secondary mathematics classrooms

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 199-214

  Hughes, Joan E ^a   McLeod, Scott ^b   Brown, Rachel ^c   Maeda, Yukiko ^c   Choi, Jiyoung ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449554259     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08923640701595365     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., and Huang, I., 1999. Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93 (1): 48–62.
2. Barker, K., and Wendel, T., 2001. “ E-Learning: Studying Canada's virtual secondary schools ”. In SAEE Research Series #8, Kelowna, British Columbia: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education.
3. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., 2004. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74 (3): 379–439.
4. Blaylock, T. H., and Newman, J. W., 2005. The impact of computer-based secondary education. Education, 125 (3): 373–384.
5. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., and Blomeyer, R., 2004. The effects of distance education on K–12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis, Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
6. Clark, T., 2001. Virtual schools: Trends and issues Available online at http://www.dlrn.org/trends.html
7. Cohen, D. K., and Hill, H. C., 1998. Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California (RR-39), Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
8. Dorman, J. P., 2003. Cross national validation of the What Is Happening in This Class questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Leaning Environments Research, 6: 231–245.
9. Educational Testing Service. 2005. 2005 Administrator's manual for the Algebra End-of-Course Assessment, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10. Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., and Fisher, D. L., Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, New York.
11. Gamoran, A., and Hannigan, E. C., 2000. Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22 (3): 241–254.
12. Haas, M., 2005. Teaching methods for secondary algebra: A meta-analysis of findings. NASSP Bulletin, 89: 24–46.
13. Johnson, R. T., and Johnson, D. W., 1994. An overview of cooperative learning Available online at http://www.co-operation.org/pages/overviewpaper.html
14. Johnson, S. D., Argon, S. R., Shaik, N., and Ralma-Rivas, N., 2000. Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11 (1): 29–49.
15. Jones, K. K., and Byrnes, J. P., 2006. Characteristics of students who benefit from high-quality mathematics instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31 (3): 328–343.
16. Kozma, R., Zucker, A., Espinoza, C., McGhee, R., Yarnall, L., Zalles, D., and Lewis, A., 2000. The online course experience: Evaluation of the virtual high school's third year of implementation, 1999–2000, Hudson, MA: SRI.
17. Margianti, E. S., Fraser, B. J., and Aldridge, J. M., Learning environment, attitudes and achievement: Assessing the perceptions of Indonesian university students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, New Orleans, LA.
18. Morrone, A. S., and Pintrich, P. R., 2006. “ Achievement motivation ”. In Children's needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention, Edited by: Bear, G. G., and Minke, K. M., 431–442. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
19. National Association of State Boards of Education. 2001. Any time, any place, any path, any pace: Taking the lead on e-learning policy Available online at http://www.nasbe.org
20. Nichols, J. D., and White, J., 2001. Impact of peer networks on achievement of high school algebra students. The Journal of Educational Research, 94 (5): 267–273.
21. Reeves, S., Vangalis, M., Vevera, L., Jensen, V., and Gillan, K., In press. “ What works in teaching and learning mathematics online: How Florida Virtual School builds community through established practices ”. In What works in K–12 online learning, Edited by: Cavanaugh, C., and Blomeyer, B., Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
22. Rivera, J. C., and Rice, M. L., 2002. A comparison of student outcomes and satisfaction between traditional and Web based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning, 5 Available online at http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/fall53/rivera53.html
23. Roblyer, M. D., and Knezek, G. A., 2003. New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36 (1): 60–71.
24. Schollie Research and Consulting. 2001. Student achievement and performance levels in online education research study, Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Online Consortium.
25. Setzer, C. J., and Lewis, L., 2005. Distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2002–2003 (No. NCES 2005-010), Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
26. Smith, R., Clark, T., and Blomeyer, R., 2005. A synthesis of new research on K-12 online learning, Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
27. Spielhagen, F. R., 2006. Closing the achievement gap in math: Considering eighth grade algebra for all students. American Secondary Education, 34 (3): 29–42.
28. Summer, J., Waigandt, A., and Whittaker, T., 2005. A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29 (3): 233–250.
29. Ungerleider, C., and Burns, T. C., 2003. A systematic review of the effectiveness and efficiency of networked ICT in education: A state of the field report, Ottawa: Council of Ministers of Education Canada and Industry Canada.
30. United States Department of Education. 2004. Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and today's students are revolutionizing expectations, National Education Technology Plan 2004, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
31. Watson, J., and Ryan, J., 2006. Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice, Evergreen, CO: Evergreen Consulting Associates.