Characterization of shaking intensity distribution and seismic assessment of RC buildings for the Kashmir (Pakistan) earthquake of October 2005

Engineering Structures

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2998-3015

  Kim, Sung Jig ^a   Elnashai, Amr S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Back analysis; Building structures; Kashmir earthquake; Vertical ground motion

Indexed keywords

AXIAL EXCITATION; BACK-ANALYSIS; BUILDING STRUCTURES; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND MOTIONS; INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION; KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE; NATURAL DISASTERS; PAKISTAN; PRACTICING ENGINEERS; RC BUILDINGS; REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT; SHEAR CAPACITY; VERTICAL COMPONENT; VERTICAL GROUND MOTION; VERTICAL MEMBERS; VERTICAL MOTIONS;

BUILDING MATERIALS; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; DISASTERS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EARTHQUAKES;

BUILDING; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; GROUND MOTION; KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE 2005; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; VERTICAL MOVEMENT;

ASIA; EURASIA; PAKISTAN; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 70449533059     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Asian Development Bank and World Bank. Preliminary damage and needs assessment. Nov. 12 2005
2. Durrani A, Elnashai AS, Hashash Y, Kim SJ, Masud A. The Kashmir earthquake of october 8, 2005: A quicklook report. Mid-America Earthquake Center. Report no. 05-04; 2005
3. Papazoglou A.J., and Elnashai A.S. Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 25 (1996) 1109-1137
4. Elnashai A.S., and Papazoglou A.J. Procedure and spectra for analysis of RC structures subjected to strong vertical earthquake loads. J Earth Eng 1 1 (1997) 121-156
5. Saadeghvaziri M.A., and Foutch D.A. Dynamic behavior of R/C highway bridges under the combined effect of vertical and horizontal earthquake motions. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 20 (1991) 535-549
6. Broderick B.M., and Elnashai A.S. Analysis of the failure of Interstate 10 freeway ramp during the Northridge earthquake of 17 January 1994. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 24 (1995) 189-208
7. Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS. Vulnerability of code-compliant RC buildings under multi-axial earthquake loading. In: 4th International conference on earthquake engineering. Paper No. 115; 2006
8. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Earthquake spectra and design. Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 1982. p. 103
9. Elnashai A.S. Analysis of the damage potential of the Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake of August 1999. J Eng Struct 22 (2000) 744-754
10. Bommer J.J., and Martinez-Pereira A. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. J Earth Eng 3 2 (1999) 127-172
11. Chang FK, Krinitzsky EL. State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States; Report 8, Duration, spectral content, and predominant period of strong motion earthquake records from western United States. Miscellaneous paper S-73-1. Vicksburg (MS): US Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station; 1977
12. Kamiyama M. Effects of subsoils conditions and other factors on the duration of earthquake ground shakings. In: Proc. eighth world conference on earthquake engineering. vol. 2. 1984. p. 793-800
13. Papazachos BC, Papaiannou CA, Margaris VN, Theodulidis NP. Seismic hazard assessment in Greece based on strong motion duration. In: Proc. tenth world conference on earthquake engineering. vol. 2. 1992. p. 425-30
14. Ambraseys N.N., Douglas J., Sarma S.K., and Smit P.M. Equation for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earth Eng 3 1 (2005) 1-53
15. Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE. Estimation of response spectra and peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: An interim report. Open-file Report 93-509. US Geological Survey; 1993
16. Youngs R.R., Chiou S.J., Silva W.J., and Humphrey J.R. Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68 1 (1997) 58-73
17. Atkinson G.M., and Boore D.M. Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 93 4 (2003) 1703-1729
18. Campbell K.W., and Bozorgnia Y. Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 93 1 (2003) 314-331
19. Ambraseys N.N., Douglas J., Sarma S.K., and Smit P.M. Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: Vertical peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earth Eng 3 1 (2005) 55-73
20. Zhao J.X., Zhang J., Asano A., Ohno Y., Oouchi T., Takahashi T., et al. Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 96 3 (2006) 898-913
21. Schmidt V, Dahle A, Bungum H. Costa Rican spectral strong motion attenuation. Tech. rept. NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway. Reduction of Natural Disasters in central America earthquake preparedness and hazard mitigation phase II: 1996-2000, Part 2. 1997
22. Schmidt V. personal communications with Kim, SJ; Feb. 2009
23. Collier C.J., and Elnashai A.S. A procedure for combining vertical and horizontal seismic action effects. J Earth Eng 5 4 (2001) 521-539
24. Kwon O., and Elnashai A.S. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Eng Struct 28 (2006) 289-303
25. Erberik M.A., and Elnashai A.S. Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures. Eng Struct 26 (2004) 937-948
26. Jeong S.-H., and Elnashai A.S. Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing - Part I: Analytical model verification. J Earth Eng 9 1 (2005) 95-128
27. Eurocode 8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 1994
28. Mwafy AM. Seismic performance of code-designed RC buildings. Ph.D. thesis. Imperial College, University of London; 2001
29. Elnashai A.S., Papanikolaou V., Lee D.. Zeus NL - A system for inelastic analysis of structures. Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2004
30. SEAOC. Performance based seismic engineering of buildings. In: Vision 2000 committee. Sacramento (CA): Structural Engineers Association of California; 1995
31. FEMA 273. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1996
32. ASCE. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI 7-05. Reston (VA): American Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Engineers Association of California; 2006
33. Rossetto T., and Elnashai A.S. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25 (2003) 1241-1263
34. Dymiotis C., Kappos A.J., and Chryssanthopoulos M.K. Seismic reliability of RC frames with uncertain drift and member capacity. J Struct Eng 125 9 (1999) 1038-1047
35. Lu Y., Gu X., and Guan J. Probabilistic drift limits and performance evaluation of reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng 131 6 (2005)
36. Priestley M.J.N., Verma R., and Xiao Y. Seismic shear strength of reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng, ASCE 120 8 (1994) 2310-2329
37. ACI. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05). American Concrete Institute; 2005
38. Eurocode 2. Design of concrete structures - Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2004