A multilevel analysis of the effect of prompting self-regulation in technology-delivered instruction

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 697-734

  Sitzmann, Traci ^a,d   Bell, Bradford S ^b   Kraiger, Kurt ^c   Kanar, Adam M ^a  

^a PDRI ^*  (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d Advanced Distributed Learning Co Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449488790     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: 17446570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01155.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Akaike H 1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716 723.
2. American College Testing Program 1989). Preliminary technical manual for the Enhanced ACT Assessment. Iowa City, IA : Author.
3. Bandura A 1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
4. Bandura A 1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York : Freeman.
5. Bandura A, Cervone D 1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017 1028.
6. Bandura A, Locke EA 2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87 99.
7. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ 2002a). Adaptive guidance: Enhancing self-regulation, knowledge, and performance in technology-based training. Personnel Psychology, 55, 267 307.
8. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ 2002b). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 497 505.
9. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ 2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 296 316.
10. Bliese PD, Ployhart RE 2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362 387.
11. Briggs GE, Naylor JC 1962). The relative efficiency of several training methods as a function of transfer task complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 505 512.
12. Brown KG 2001). Using computers to deliver training: Which employees learn and why? Personnel Psychology, 54, 271 296.
13. Butler DL, Winne PH 1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245 281.
14. Carver CS, Scheier MF 1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19 35.
15. Cassady JC 2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7. Retrieved July 29, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=12.
16. Cellier J, Eyrolle H 1992). Interference between switched tasks. Ergonomics, 35, 25 36.
17. Chen G, Gully SM, Whiteman JA, Kilcullen RN 2000). Examination of the relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835 847.
18. Clarke T, Ayres P, Sweller J 2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53, 15 24.
19. Colquitt JA, LePine JA, Noe RA 2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytical path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678 707.
20. Corliss SB 2005). The effects of reflective prompts and collaborative learning in hypermedia problem-based learning environments on problem solving and metacognitive skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
21. DeRouin, R. E., Fritzsche BA, Salas E 2005). E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 31, 920 940.
22. DeShon RP, Brown KG, Greenis JL 1996). Does self-regulation require cognitive resources? Evaluation of resource allocation models of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 595 608.
23. Donovan JJ, Williams KJ 2003). Missing the mark: Effects of time and causal attributions on goal revision in response to goal - performance discrepancies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 379 390.
24. Dorans NJ 1999). Correspondences between ACT and SAT I scores (College Board Research Report 99-1; ETS RR 99-2). New York : College Entrance Examination Board. Retrieved October 2008 at http://www.collegeboard.com/ repository/rr9901 - 3913.pdf.
25. Eveland WP, Jr., Dunwoody S 2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load: Learning from the web versus print. Communication Research, 28, 48 78.
26. Ford JK, Kraiger K 1995). The application of cognitive constructs to the instructional systems model of training: Implications for needs assessment, design and transfer. In Cooper CL, Robertson IT (Eds. International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1 48). Chichester, UK : Wiley.
27. Ford JK, Smith EM, Weissbein DA, Gully SM, Salas E 1998). Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 218 233.
28. Frey M, Detterman D 2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15, 373 378.
29. Gagné RM, Merrill MD 1992). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology and Research and Development, 38, 23 30.
30. Gillie T, Broadbent DE 1989). What make interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research, 50, 243 250.
31. Goettl BP, Yadrick RM, Connolly-Gomez C, Regian JW, Shebilske WL 1996). Alternating task modules in isochronal distributed training of complex tasks. Human Factors, 38, 330 346.
32. Gully SM, Payne SC, Koles KLK, Whiteman JK 2002). The impact of error training and individual differences on training outcomes: An attribute-treatment interaction perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 143 155.
33. Ilies R, Judge TA 2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453 467.
34. Jones EE 1989). The framing of competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 477 492.
35. Kanfer R 1996). Self-regulatory and other non-ability determinants of skill acquisition. In Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (Eds. The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 404 423). New York : Guilford.
36. Kanfer R, Ackerman PL 1989). Motivational and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657 690.
37. Kanfer R, Ackerman PL 1996). A self-regulatory skills perspective to reducing cognitive interference. In Sarason IG, Pierce GR, Sarason BR (Eds. Cognitive interference: Theories, methods, and findings (pp. 153 171). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
38. Kanfer R, Ackerman PL, Murtha TC, Dugdale B, Nelson L 1994). Goal setting, conditions of practice, and task performance: A resource allocation perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 826 835.
39. Karoly P 1993). Mechanisms of self regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23 52.
40. Kauffman DF 2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 139 161.
41. Keith N, Frese M 2005). Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677 691.
42. Kohler DB 2002). The effects of metacognitive language learning strategy training on lower-achieving second language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Salt Lake City, UT.
43. Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS 2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 900 916.
44. Kozlowski SWJ, Gully SM, Brown KG, Salas E, Smith EM, Nason ER 2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 1 31.
45. Kraiger K, Jerden E 2007). A meta-analytic investigation of learner control: Old findings and new directions. In Fiore SM, Salas E (Eds. Toward a science of distributed learning (pp. 65 90). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
46. Kreft I, de Leeuw J 1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
47. Locke EA, Latham GP 2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705 717.
48. Monk CA, Boehm-Davis DA, Trafton JG 2004). Recovering from interruptions: Implications for driver distraction research. Human Factors, 46, 650 663.
49. Naylor JC, Briggs GE 1963). Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 217 224.
50. Norman DA, Bobrow DB 1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44 64.
51. Payne SC, Youngcourt SS, Beaubien JM 2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128 150.
52. Porath CL, Bateman TS 2006). Self-regulation: From goal orientation to job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 185 192.
53. Ree MJ, Earles JA 1991). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321 332.
54. Reeves TC 1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of learner control research. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20, 39 46.
55. Schmidt AM, Ford JK 2003). Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56, 405 429.
56. Schwarz G 1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461 464.
57. Singer JD, Willett JB 2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York : Oxford University Press.
58. Sitzmann T, Ely K, Brown KG, Bauer K in press). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning and Education.
59. Sitzmann T, Kraiger K, Stewart D, Wisher R 2006). The comparative effectiveness of Web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623 664.
60. Snow RE 1986). Individual differences and the design of educational programs. American Psychologist, 41, 1029 1039.
61. Sweller J, van Merrienboer JJG, Paas FGWC 1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251 296.
62. Tennyson RD, Breuer K 1997). Psychological foundations for instructional design. In Tennyson RD, Schott F, Seel NM, Dijkstra S (Eds. Instructional design: International perspectives: Vol. 1. Theory, research, and models (pp. 113 134). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
63. Thomas KM, Mathieu JE 1994). Role of causal attributions in dynamic self-regulation and goal processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 812 818.
64. Toney RJ 2000). An investigation of learner control and metacognition using a Web-based training program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
65. Vancouver JB, Kendall LN 2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1146 1153.
66. Weaver CA, Kelemen WL 2002). Comparing processing-based, stimulus-based, and subject-based factors in metacognition. In Chambres P, Izaute M, Marescaux P-J (Eds. Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 49 62). New York : Kluwer.
67. Weaver JL, Bowers CA, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA 1995). Networked simulations: New paradigms for team performance research. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 12 24.
68. Winne PH 1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173 187.
69. Winne PH 1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulatory learning. Learning & Individual Differences, 8, 327 353.
70. Winters D, Latham GP 1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21, 236 250.
71. Yeo GB, Neal A 2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 231 247.
72. Yeo G, Neal A 2008). Subjective cognitive effort: A model of states, traits, and time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 617 631.
73. Zijlstra FRH, Roe RA, Leonora AB, Krediet I 1999). Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 163 185.