Ohio's Balanced Growth Program: A case study of collaboration for planning and policy design

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 549-570

  Kellogg, Wendy A ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative environmental planning and management; Great Lakes; Ohio; State government; Watersheds

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PLANNING PROCESS; STATE ROLE; URBANIZATION; WATERSHED;

GREAT LAKES [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70449440410     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560902868454     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abbott, C., 2002. Planning a sustainable city: The promise and performance of Portland's urban growth boundary. In: G Squires, ed. Urban sprawl: casuses, consequences and policy responses. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, 207-236.
2. Agocs, C., 1997. Institutionalized resistance to organizational change: denial, inaction and repression. Journal of business ethics, 16 (9), 917-931.
3. Ashforth, B., 1992. The perceived inequity of systems. Administration and society, 24 (3), 375-408.
4. Astleithner, F. and Hamedinger, A., 2003. The analysis of sustainability indicators as socially constructed policy instruments: benefits and challenges of 'interactive research'. Local environment, 8 (6), 627-640.
5. BG Task Force Minutes. November 2001.
6. Bengston, D., Fletcher, J., and Nelson, K., 2004. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and urban planning, 69, 271-286.
7. Blair, R., 2001. Managing urban growth: can the policy tools approach improve effectiveness? Public works management and policy, 6 (2), 102-113.
8. Booher, D., 2004. Collaborative governance practices and democracy. National civic review, (Winter), 32-46.
9. Breggin, L., 2003. Planning for biodiversity: authorities in state land use laws. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
10. Carruthers, J., 2002. The impacts of state growth management programs: a comparative analysis. Urban studies, 39, 1959-1982.
11. Carruthers, J. and Ulfarsson, G., 2002. Fragmentation and sprawl: evidence from interregional analysis. Growth and change, 33, 312-340.
12. Chipman, J., 2002. A law unto itself: how the Ontario Municipal Board has developed and applied land use planning policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Clean Water Act, 1972. 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.
13. Coastal Resources Center, 2004. Research and learning. [online] Available from: www.cre.uri.edu/comm/research_pubs.html [Accessed July 2008].
14. Cohen, J., 2002. Maryland's 'smart growth': using incentives to combat sprawl. In: G. Squires, ed. Urban sprawl: causes, consequences, and policy responses. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, 293-324.
15. Cooper, T. and Kathi, P., 2005. Neighborhood councils and city agencies: a model of collaborative co-production. National civic review (Spring), 43-53.
16. Correl, M., et al., 1978. The effects of greenbelts on residential property values: some findings on the political economy of open space. Land economics, 54 (2), 207-217.
17. Cullingworth, J., 1993. The political culture of planning: American land use planning in comparative perspective. New York: Routledge.
18. Department of Economic Development, 2005. Keystone principles for growth, investment and resource conservation. Department of Community and Economic Development, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. [online] Available from: http://www.newpa.com [Accessed 22 September 2007].
19. Edelbos, J. and Klijn, E., 2005. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of public administration research and theory, 16, 417-446.
20. EcoCity Cleveland, 2006. [online] Available from: http:www.ecocitycleveland.org [Accessed 21 September 2007].
21. GLC (Great Lakes Commission), 2005. Ohio land use roundtable summary. [online] Available from: http://glc.org/landuse/ohroundtable/ [Accessed 21 September 2007].
22. Hall, P., et al., 1973. The containment of urban England. Volume 1 urban and metropolitan growth processes. London: George Allen & Unwin.
23. Harter, P., 1982. Negotiating regulations: a cure for the malaise. Georgetown law journal, 71 (1),1-118.
24. Heikkila, T. and Gerlak, A., 2005. The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science and institutions. The policy studies journal, 33 (4), 583-612.
25. Heinz Center, 2004. Innovation by design: improving learning networks in coastal management. Washington, DC: H. John Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment.
26. Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E., 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65 (4), 412-423.
27. Kauffman, G., 2002. What if... the United States of America were based on watersheds? Water policy, 4 (1), 7-68.
28. Kellogg, W., 2007. The state role in guiding land use change in the Ohio Lake Erie Basin: key policies, programs, and incentives for the Ohio Balanced Growth Program/ Final Report. Cleveland, Ohio: EcoCity Cleveland/Green City Blue Lake. [online] Available from: http://www.greencitybluelake.org/images/land/wendy_policy_paper.pdf [Accessed20September 2007].
29. Kellogg, W., et al., 2005. Training needs of coastal resources decision makers in Ohio's Lake Erie Basin. Coastal management, 33 (3), 335-351.
30. Koontz, T., 2006. Collaboration for sustainability? A framework for analyzing government impacts in collaborative environmental management. Sustainability: science, practice and policy, 2 (1), 15-24.[online] Available from: http://ejournal.nbii.org [Accessed 21 September 2007].
31. Koontz, T. and Johnson, E., 2004. One size does not fit all: matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy science, 37, 185-204.
32. Koontz, T. and Thomas, C.W., 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public administration review, 66, 111-121.
33. Lee, S. and Kellogg, W., 2009. Methodology for land use and socioeconomic indicators for the Ohio Balanced Growth Program and a pilot test to establish baseline data. Cleveland, Ohio: The Urban Centre, Levin College of Urban Affairs.
34. Mandarano, L.A., 2008. Evaluating collaborative environmental planning outputs and outcomes. Journal of planning education and research, 27 (4), 456-468.
35. Meck, S. and Perlman, K., 2002. Ohio planning and zoning law. Cleveland, OH: Banks-Baldwin Law Publishing.
36. Nelson, A., 2002. How do we know smart growth when we see it? In: T. Szold and A. Carbonell, eds. Smart growth: form and consequences. Boston, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 82-101.
37. Nelson, A. and Duncan, J., 1995. Growth management principles and practices. Chicago: American Planning Association.
38. Nelson, A. and Moore, T., 1996. Assessing growth management policy implementation: cases study ofthe United State'sleading growthmanagementstate. Landusepolicy, 13 (4),241-259.
39. Newman, J., et al., 2004. Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of social policy, 33 (2), 203-223.
40. Ohio State Watershed Network, 2007. [online] Available from: http://ohiowatersheds.osu.edu [Accessed 20 September 2007].
41. OLEC (Ohio Lake Erie Commission), 2000. Lake Erie restoration and protection plan. Toledo, OH: Ohio Lake Erie Commission.
42. OLEC, 2004. Linking land use and Lake Erie: a framework for achieving balanced growth in the Ohio Lake Erie watershed. Toledo, OH: Ohio Lake Erie Commission. [online] Available from: http://www.epa.state.oh.us/oleo/bg1/framework.html [Accessed20September 2007].
43. OLEC, 2005. Ohio Lake Erie Commission. [online] Available from: http://www.epa.state.oh.us/oleo/commissi.htm [Accessed 20 September 2007].
44. OLEC, 2006a. Watershed Balanced Growth Plans pilot projects. [online] Available from: http://www.epa.state.oh/oleo/bg1/pilotprojects.html [Accessed 18 September 2007].
45. OLEC, 2006b. Lake Erie balanced growth strategy. Toledo, OH: Ohio Lake Erie Commission. [online] Available from: http://www.epa.state.oh.us/oleo/bg1/strategy.html [Accessed 15 September 2007].
46. Ozawa, C.P., 1991. Recasting science: consensual procedures in public policy making. Boulder, CO: Westview.
47. Pendall, R., 2003. Sprawl without growth: the upstate paradox. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution/Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
48. Pendall, R., Martin, J., and Fulton, W., 2002. Holding the line: urban containment in the United States. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution/Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. [online] Available from: http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/es/urban/publications/pendallfultoncontainment.pdf [Accessed 1 June 2006].
49. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G., 2003. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
50. Planning and Incentives Workgroup, 2002. Meeting Agenda. Ohio Lake Erie Commission Balanced Growth Program, Toledo, Ohio.
51. Planning and Incentives Workgroup, 2003a. Meeting Agenda and Notes, 22 January 2003. Ohio Lake Erie Commission Balanced Growth Program, Toledo, Ohio.
52. Planning and Incentives Workgroup, 2003b. Meeting Agenda and Minutes, 23 July 2003. Ohio Lake Erie Commission Balanced Growth Program, Toledo, Ohio.
53. Randolph, J., 2004. Collaborative environmental management and public participation. In: J. Randolph, ed. Environmental land use planning and management. Washington, DC: Island Press, 53-74.
54. Richardson, J., Gough, M., and Puentes, R., 2003. Is home rule the answer? Clarifying the influence of Dillon's rule on growth management. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution/Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
55. Val, M. and Fuentes, C., 2003. Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Management decisions, 41 (2), 148-155.
56. Wiig, K.M., 2002. Knowledge management in public administration. Journal of knowledge management, 6 (3), 224-239.
57. Wolfe, J.M., 2002. Reinventing planning:Canada. Progress in planning, 57 (3-4), 207-235.
58. Wondolleck, J.M. and Yaffee, S.L., 2000. Making collaboration work. Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.