Effects of robotic-aided rehabilitation on recovery of upper extremity function in chronic stroke: A single case study

Occupational Therapy International

Volumn 16, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 232-243

  Flinn, Nancy A ^a,b   Smith, Jennifer L ^a,c   Tripp, Christopher J ^a,c   White, Matthew W ^a,c  

^a Sister Kenny Rehabilitation Institute   (United States)

^b ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Sister Kenny Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Case study research; Robotic arm; Stroke rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PARESIS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 70449427026     PISSN: 09667903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/oti.280     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bonifer N, Anderson KM (2003). Application of constraint-induced movement therapy for an individual with severe chronic upper extremity hemiplegia. Physical Therapy 83: 384-398. (Pubitemid 36384343)
2. Bonifer N, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB (2005). Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86: 1867-1873. (Pubitemid 41354203)
3. Cup EH, Scholte-op-Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA (2003). Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation 17: 402-409. (Pubitemid 36621952)
4. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N (2003). Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84: 477-482. (Pubitemid 36417645)
5. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N (2004). Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85: 1106-1111. (Pubitemid 38962368)
6. Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT (2003). Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology 61: 1604-1607. (Pubitemid 37505588)
7. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 7: 13-31.
8. Kilmer G, Roberts H, Hughes E, Li Y, Balluru B, Fan A, Giles W, Mokdad A, Jiles R (2008). Surveilance of certain health behaviors and conditions among states and selected local areas - Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) United States, 2006. MMWR, 57: 1-188.
9. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT (1998). Robot aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 6: 75-87.
10. Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N (2008). A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation 23: 81-87. (Pubitemid 352038564)
11. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N (1998). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (3rd ed). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Publications, Ace.
12. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M (2002). Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83: 952-959. (Pubitemid 34747579)
13. National Stroke Association (2008). What is stroke? (Available at: http://www.stroke.org/site/ PageServer?pagename=STROKE) (Accessed 10 March 2008.)
14. Radomski M, Trombly Lathum C (2008a). Assessing abilities and capabilities: range of motion, strength and endurance. In: N Flinn, C Trombly, C Robinson Podolski (Eds.). Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction (6th edn, pp. 91-185). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.
15. Radomski M, Trombly Lathum C (2008b). Optimizing motor behavior using Brunnstrom movement therapy approach. In: C Trombly Lathum (Ed.). Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction (6th edn, pp. 667-689). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.
16. Taub E, Wolf SL (1997). Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 3: 38-61. (Pubitemid 27100569)
17. Taub E, Miller NE, Novak TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 74: 347-354. (Pubitemid 23115348)
18. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 36: 1-17. (Pubitemid 30542487)
19. Taub E, Uswattee G, Mark VW, Morris DM (2006). The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Europa Medicophysica 42: 241-256. (Pubitemid 46030367)
20. Uswatte G, Taub E (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy: new approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. In: DT Stuss, G Winocur, IH Robertson (Eds.). Cognitive Rehabilitation (pp. 215-229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM, Aisen ML (1999). Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology 53: 1874-1876. (Pubitemid 29530373)
22. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N (2003). Robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation. Advances in Neurology 92: 429-433.
23. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A (2001). Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32: 1635-1639. (Pubitemid 32631916)