Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of a direct compression molded porous tantalum-UHMWPEconstruct: A microstructuralmodel

Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Biomechanics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 34-42

  Vivanco, Juan ^a   Fang, Zhibin ^b   Levine, Danny ^b   Ploeg, Heidi Lynn ^a  

^a Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

^b ZIMMER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone scaffold; Cellular solids; Finite element analysis; Microstructure; Voronoi model

Indexed keywords

TANTALUM; ULTRA HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; POROSITY; RIGIDITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 70449411126     PISSN: 17226899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bartel DL, Rawlinson JJ, Burstein AH, Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Jr. Stresses in polyethylene components of contemporary total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (317): 76-82.
2. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultrahigh molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 1041-51.
3. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 2529-43.
4. Shimko DA, Shimko VF, Sander EA, Dickson KF, Nauman EA. Effect of porosity on the fluid flow characteristics and mechanical properties of tantalum scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2005; 73: 315-24.
5. Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, Chua CK. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 2001; 7: 679-89.
6. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 907-14.
7. Hacking SA, Bobyn JD, Toh K, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 52: 631-8.
8. Fitzpatrick D, Ahn P, Brown T, Poggie R. Friction coefficients of porous tantalum and cancellous and cortical bone. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual American Society for Biomechanics; 1997 Sep. 24-27. Clemson, South Carolina.
9. Poggie R, Brown T, Pederson D. Finite element analysis of peri-acetabular stress of cemented, metal-backed, and porous tantalum backed acetabular components. 1999; Anaheim, California. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 1999 Feb. 1-4. Anaheim, California.
10. Gibson L, Ashby M. Cellular Solid: Structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
11. Mills NJ. Micromechanics of Polymeric foams. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Meeting on Materials and Mechanics; 2000 Aalborg, Denmark pp. 45-76.
12. Li K, Gao XL, Subhash G. Effects of cell shape and cell wall thickness variations on the elastic properties of two-dimensional cellular solids. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2005; 42: 1777-95.
13. Van der Burg MWD, Shulmeister V, Van der Geissen E, Marissen R. On the linear elastic properties of regular and random open-cell foam models. Journal of Cellular Plastics 1997; 33: 31-54.
14. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4671-81.
15. Fang Z, Kralovic B, Levine D, Johnson T. The effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of porous tantalum: an FEM based theoretical model. In: Proceedings of 53rd Annual Meeting of Orthopaedic Research Society; 2007 Feb. 11-14; San Diego, California.
16. Silva MJ, Hayes WC, Gibson LJ. The effects of non-periodic microstructure on the elastic properties of twodimensional cellular solids. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 1995; 37: 1161-77.
17. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller JE, Brooks CE. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 274: 79-96.
18. DeHeer DC, Hillberry BM. The effect of thickness an nonlinear material behaviour on contact stresses in polyethylene tibial components. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of Orthopaedic Research Society; 1992 Feb. 17-20; Washington, D.C.
19. Keaveny TM, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Yeh OC. Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2001; 3: 307-33.
20. Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Keaveny TM. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 2003; 36: 897-904.
21. Hodgskinson R, Currey JD. Young's modulus, density and material properties in cancellous bone over a large density range. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1992; 3: 377-381.
22. Ashman RB, Rho JY, Turner CH. Anatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia. J Biomech 1989; 22: 895-900.
23. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14: 107-14.
24. Frich LH, Jensen NC, Odgaard A, Pedersen CM, Sojbjerg JO, Dalstra M. Bone strength and material properties of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1997; 6: 97-104.
25. Dalstra M, Huiskes R, van Erning L. Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. J Biomech Eng 1995; 117: 272-8.
26. Augat P, Link T, Lang TF, Lin JC, Majumdar S, Genant HK. Anisotropy of the elastic modulus of trabecular bone specimens from different anatomical locations. Med Eng Phys 1998; 20: 124-31.
27. Goldstein SA. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomech 1987; 20: 1055-61.