Faculty guide to the institutional review board process

Nurse Educator

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 244-248

  Kaktins, Nina M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PEER REVIEW; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

COERCION; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FACULTY, NURSING; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING RESEARCH; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 70449368825     PISSN: 03633624     EISSN: 15389855     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181bc7450     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Charrow R. Protection of human subjects: is expansive regulation counter-productive. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2007;101(2):707-721.
2. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. US Department of Health Education and Welfare. 1974. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/ belmont.htm. Accessed March 26, 2009.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Public Welfare Part 46 Protection of human subjects. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2005. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/documents/ OHRPRegulations.pdf. Accessed March 26, 2009.
4. Hamburger P. Getting permission. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2007;101(2):405-492.
5. Carpenter D. Institutional review boards, regulatory incentives, and some modest proposals for reform. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2007;101(2):687-705.
6. Currie P. Balancing privacy protections with efficient research. IRB. 2005;27(5):7-12.
7. Shamoo AE. Deregulating low-risk research-Chronicle.com. Chron High Educ. 2007;53(48):50.
8. White RF. Institutional review board mission creep. Independent Rev. 2007;11(4):547-564.
9. Arford PH. Working with human research protections. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(3):265-271.
10. Thompson JJ, Elgin D, Hyman DA, Rubin PE, Knight J. Research on human subjects: academic freedom and the institutional review board. Academe. 2006;92(5):95-100.
11. Rothstein WG, Phuong LH. Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of institutional review boards. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(1):75-81.
12. Larson E, Bratts T, Zwanziger J, Stone P. A survey of IRB process in 68 U.S. hospitals. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(3):260-264.
13. Skarbek DM, Henry P, Parish P. Institutional review board (IRB): another major ingredient for our alphabet soup. Teach Except Child. 2006;38(4):26-30.
14. Currie PM. Balancing privacy protections with efficient research: institutional review boards and the use of certificates of confidentiality. Ethics Hum Res. 2005;27(5):7-13.
15. Milne C. Overseeing research: ethics and the institutional review board. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2005. Available at http://www.qualitative- research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/531/1151. Accessed March 26, 2009.
16. Corwin ZB, Tierney WG. The qualitative misfit: evaluating the interpretive complexity of IRBs. American Sociological Association, Conference Papers. nd:1-14.
17. Anderson EE. A qualitative study of non-affiliated, nonscientist institutional review board members. Account Res. 2006;13:135-155.
18. Kotzer AM, Milton J. An education initiative to increase staff knowledge of institutional review board guidelines in the USA. Nurs Health Sci. 2007;9:103-106.
19. Menikoff J. Where's the law? Uncovering the truth about IRBs and censorship. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2007;101(2):791-799.
20. Office for Human Research Protections. Categories of research that may be reviewed by the institutional review board (IRB) through an expedited review procedure. US Department of Health and Human Services. 1998. Available at http://www. hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/expedited98.htm. Accessed March 26, 2009.