Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of institutional review boards: Health policy and systems

Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 75-81

  Rothstein, William G ^a   Phuong, Linh H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Health research ethics; Institutional review boards

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ETHICS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; GUIDELINES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MARYLAND; MIDDLE AGED; NURSES; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATION; PHYSICIANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847225593     PISSN: 15276546     EISSN: 15475069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00147.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Amdur, R.J., & Bankert, E.A. (2002). Institutional review board: Management and function. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
2. Anderson, E.E. (2006). A qualitative study of non-affiliated, non-scientist institutional review board members. Accountability in Research, 13, 135-155.
3. Bodenheimer, T. (2000). Uneasy alliance-clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1539-1543.
4. Cassidy, V.R., & Oddi, L.F. (1993). Nurses on hospital IRBs: A critical voice in protecting human subjects. NursingConnections, 6, 31-38.
5. Cho, M.K., & Billings, P. (1997). Conflict of interest and institutional review boards. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 45, 154-159.
6. Code of Federal Regulations. (1991, June 18). Title 45 Part 46. 56 FR 28003.
7. Dabbs, A.D., & Nolan, M.T. (1997). Nurses as members of institutional review boards. Applied Nursing Research, 10, 101-107.
8. Edgar, H., & Rothman, D.J. (1995). The institutional review board and beyond: Future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. Milbank Quarterly, 73, 489-506.
9. Emanuel, E.J., & Steiner, D. (1995). Institutional conflict of interest. New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 262-267.
10. Federman, D.D., Hanna, K.E., & Rodriguez, L.L. (Eds.). (2003). Responsible research: A systems approach to protecting research participants. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
11. Francis, L. (1996). IRBs and conflicts of interest. In R.G. Spece, Jr., D.S. Shimm, & A.E. Buchanan (Eds.), Conflicts of interest in clinical practice and research (pp. 418-36). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Jones, J.S., White, L.J., Pool, L.C., & Dougherty, J.M. (1996). Structure and practice of institutional review boards in the United States. Academic Emergency Medicine, 3, 804-809.
13. Lo, B., Wolf, L.E., & Berkeley, A. (2000). Conflict-of-interest policies for investigators in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 1616-1620.
14. McDaniel, C. (1998). Hospital ethics committees and nurses' participation. JONA, 28, 47-51.
15. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (2001). Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants (Vol. 1). Bethesda, MD: Author.
16. Nelson, D.K. (2002). Conflict of interest: IRBs. In R.J. Amdur & E.A. Bankert (Eds.), Institutional review board: Management and function (pp. 208-212). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
17. Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. (1998). Institutional review boards: A time for reform. Report No. OEI-01-97-00193. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Peckman, S. (2001). Local institutional review boards. In National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants (Vol. 2; pp. K1-K35). Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
19. Redman, B.K., & Donovan, C. (1999). Ethical and human rights concerns of Connecticut nurses: Survey and implications for the profession. NursingConnections, 12, 41-46.
20. Rozovsky, F.A., & Adams, R.K. (2003). Clinical trials and human research: A practical guide to regulatory compliance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Shimm, D.S., & Spece, R.G., Jr. (1996). An introduction to conflicts of interest in clinical research. In R.G. Spece, Jr., D.S. Shimm, & A.E. Buchanan (Eds.), Conflicts of interest in clinical practice and research (pp. 361-388). New York: Oxford University Press.