Can wire-guided cannulation reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1710-1715

  Shao, Li Ming ^a   Chen, Qing Yu ^a   Chen, Miao Yan ^a   Cai, Jian Ting ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis; Wire guided cannulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK REDUCTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 70449365673     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: 14401746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06010.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1991 37 : 383 393.
2. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1998 48 : 1 10.
3. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001 54 : 425 434.
4. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2001 96 : 417 423.
5. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004 60 : 721 731.
6. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007 102 : 1781 1788.
7. Elmunzer BJ, Waljee AK, Elta GH, Taylor JR, Fehmi SM, Higgins PD. A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut 2008 57 : 1262 1267.
8. Cooper ST, Slivka A. Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 2007 36 : 259 276.
9. Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G et al. Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004 60 : 544 550.
10. Freeman ML. Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007 5 : 1354 1365.
11. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002 56 : 652 656.
12. Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, Bonassi U. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004 59 : 830 834.
13. Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE, Halwan B, Ishioka S, Kumar A. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007 102 : 2147 2153.
14. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2008 40 : 296 301.
15. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin. Trials 1996 17 : 1 12.
16. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998 352 : 609 613. (Pubitemid 28380142)
17. Lee TH, Park DH, Park JY et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009 69 : 444 449.
18. Park DH, Lee TH, Park JY et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2008 67 : AB328.
19. Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Turner JW. Prognostic signs and nonoperative peritoneal lavage in acute pancreatitis. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1976 143 : 209 219.
20. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ. Reply to the letter of Park. Endoscopy 2008 40 : 785.
21. Siegel JH, Pullano W. Two new methods for selective bile duct cannulation and sphincterotomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1987 33 : 438 440.
22. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology assessment status evaluation: guidewires in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1998 47 : 579 583.
23. Neuhaus H. Performance, length, and cost of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guide wires: which is the best mix of features? Endoscopy 2006 38 : 1146 1148.
24. Reddy SC, Draganov PV. ERCP wire systems: the long and the short of it. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009 15 : 55 60.
25. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J et al. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 2008 40 : 302 307.
26. Park DH, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. Is the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis not reduced by guide-wire cannulation? Endoscopy 2008 40 : 784.
27. Das A, Singh P, Sivak MV, Chak A. Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007 65 : 960 968.
28. Burdick JS, Schmalz MJ, Geenen JE. Guidewire fracture during endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopy 1993 25 : 251 252.
29. Gross G, Kiker D. Intraductal knot formation in a guidewire during ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006 64 : 815 816.