Computational analysis of ventricular valve-valve interaction: Influence of flow conditions

International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 609-622

  Stijnen, J M A ^a   Bogaerds, A C B ^a   de Hart, J ^b   Bovendeerd, P H M ^a   de Mol, B A J M ^a,c   van de Vosse, F N ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b HemoLab Cardiovascular Engineering BV   (Netherlands)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Fictious domain method; Fluid structure interaction; Heart valves; Regurgitation; Ventricular flow

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449124052     PISSN: 10618562     EISSN: 10290257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10618560903092035     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baaijens, F.P.T., 2001. A fictitious domain/mortar element method for fluid-structure interaction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 35, 743-761.
2. Baccani, B., Domenichini, F., and Pedrizzetti, G., 2003. Model and influence of mitral valve opening during the left ventricular filling. Journal of Biomechanics, 36, 355- 361.
3. Bertrand, F., Tanguy, P.A., and Thibault, F., 1997. A three- dimensional fictitious domain method for incompressible fluid flow problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 25, 719-736.
4. Bluestein, D., Li, Y.M., and Krukenkamp, I.B., 2002. Free emboli formation in the wake of bi-leaflet mechanical heart valves and the effects of implantation techniques. Journal of Biomechanics, 35, 1533-1540.
5. Bluestein, D., Rambod, E., and Gharib, M., 2000. Vortex shedding as a mechanism for free emboli formation in mechanical heart valves. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 122, 125-134.
6. Cape, E.G., Sung, H., and Yoganathan, A.P., 1996. Hemodynamica assessment of carbomedics bileaflet heart valves by ultrasound: Studies in the aortic and mitral positions. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 22, 421-430.
7. Chandran, K.B., Shoephoerster, R., and Dellsperger, K.C., 1989. Effect of prosthetic mitral valve geometry and orientation on flow dynamics in a model human left ventricle. Journal of Biomechanics, 22, 51-65.
8. de Hart, J., et al., 2000. A two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction model of the aortic valve. Journal of Biomechanics, 33, 1079-1088.
9. de Hart, J., et al., 2003. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. Journal of Biomechanics, 36, 103-112.
10. Dumont, K., et al., 2007. Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechan- ical heart valves using a cfd/fsi model. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 129, 558-565.
11. Fatemi, R. and Chandran, K.B., 1989. An in vitro comparative study of St. Jude Medical and Edwards- Duromedics bileaflet valves using laser anemometry. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 111, 298-302.
12. Garitey, V., et al., 1995. Ventricular flow dynamic past bileaflet prosthetic heart valves. International Journal of Artificial Organs, 18, 380-391.
13. Gerstenberger, A. and Wall, W.A., 2008. An extended finite element method/Lagrange multiplier based approach for fluid structure interaction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197, 1699-1714.
14. Glowinski, R., Pan, T.W., and Periaux, J., 1994. A fictitious domain method for dirichlet problem and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 111, 283-303.
15. Grigioni, M., et al., 2001. The influence of the leaflets' curvature on the flow field in two bileaflet prosthetic heart valves. Journal of Biomechanics, 34, 613-621
16. Horsten, J.B.A.M., 1990. On the analysis of moving heart valves: a numerical fluid-structure interaction model. Thesis (PhD), Eindhoven University of Technology.
17. Hufnagel, C.A., et al., 1954. Surgical correction of aortic insufficiency. Surgery, 35, 673-683.
18. Kilner, P.J., et al., 2000. A symmetric redirection of flow through the heart. Nature, 404 (6779), 759-761
19. King, M.J., et al., 1996. A three-dimensional, time-dependent analysis of flow through a bileaflet mechanical heart valve: comparison of experimental and numerical results. Journal of Biomechanics, 29 (5), 609-618.
20. Kleine, P., et al., 2002. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: Comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prosthesis in pigs. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 124 (5), 925-932.
21. Krafczyk, M., et al., 1998. Analysis of 3d transient blood flow passing through an artificial aortic valve by lattice boltzmann methods. Journal of Biomechanics, 31, 453-462.
22. Kwak, D.Y. and Im, Y.T., 2003. Hexahedral mesh generation for remeshing in three-dimensional metal forming analyses. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 6691,1-7.
23. Lemmon, J.D. and Yoganathan, A.P., 2000. Three-dimensional computational model of left heart diastolic function with fluid-structure interaction. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 122, 109-117.
24. Lim, W.L., et al., 2001. Pulsatile flow studies of a procine bioprosthetic aortic valve in vitro: Piv measurements and shear-induced blood damage. Journal of Biomechanics, 34,1417-1427.
25. Mittal, R. and Iaccarino, G., 2005. Immersed Boundary Methods. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 37, 239-261.
26. Nobili, M., et al., 2008. Numerical simulation of the dynamics of a bileaflet prosthetic heawrt valve using a flui-strudture interaction approach. Journal of Biomechanics, 41, 2539-2550.
27. Patankar, S.V., 1983. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. NewYork: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, McGraw-Hill.
28. Peskin, C.S., 1972. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. Journal of Computational Physics, 10, 252-271.
29. Peskin, C.S. and McQueen, D.M., 1995. A general method for the computer simulation of biological systems interacting with fluid. Society for Experimental Biology, 49,265-276.
30. Pop, G., et al., 1989. What is the ideal orientation of a mitral disc prosthesis? an in vivo haemodynamic study based on colour flow imaging and continuous wave doppler. European Heart Journal, 10, 346-353.
31. Reul, H., Talukder, N., and Muller, E.W., 1981. Fluid mechanics of the natural mitral valve. Journal of Biomechanics, 14 (5), 361-372.
32. Stijnen, J.M.A., et al., 2004. Evaluation of a fictitious domain method for predicting dynamic response of mechanical heart valves. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 19,835.
33. van de Vosse, F.N., et al., 2003. Finite element based computational methods for cardiovascular fluid-structure interaction. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 47, 335-368.
34. van Loon, R., Anderson, P.D., and van de Vosse, F.N., 2006. A fluid structure interaction method with solid-rigid contact for heart valve dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 217, 806-823.
35. van Loon, R., et al., 2007. Comparison of various fluid structure interaction methods for deformable bodies. Computers and Structures, 85, 833-843.
36. Vierendeels, J.A., et al., 2000. Computer simulation of intraventricular flow and pressure gradients during diastole. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 122, 667-674.
37. Vlachos, P.P., et al., 2001. Vorticity and turbulence characteristics inside a transparent flexible left ventricle. In: Proceedings of the 2001 ASME Bioengineering Conference, 27 June-1 July, Snowbird, UT, BED-Vol.50, 493-495.
38. Walker, P.G., et al., 1996. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the flow in a human left heart by using magnetic resonance phase velocity encoding. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 24, 139-147.