The academic career of clinical teachers;La carrera académica del Profesor Clínico de Medicina

Revista Medica de Chile

Volumn 137, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1113-1116

  Ignacio Sanchez D ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Education; Faculty; Medical; Schools medical

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; TEACHING;

CAREER CHOICE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; STAFF DEVELOPMENT; TEACHING;

EID: 70449111293     PISSN: 00349887     EISSN: 07176163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BOYER EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990.
2. RICE RE. "Scholarship Reconsidered" History and Context. In: O'Meara K, Rice RE (eds). Faculty Priorities Reconsidered: Rewarding Multiple Forms of Scholarships. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005; 17-38.
3. GLASSICK CE, HUBER MT, MAEROFF GI. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
4. AAMC. Advancing educators and Education: Defining the components and evidence of Educational Scholarship. Summary Report 2007.
5. WHITCOMB M. The medical school's faculty is its most important asset. Acad Med 2003; 78: 117-8.
6. SIMPSON D, HAFLER J, BROWN D, WILKERSON L. Documentation Systems for educators seeking academic promotion inUS medical schools. Acad Med 2004; 79: 783-90.
7. BEASLEY BW, WRIGHT SM, CONFRANCESCO J, BABBOTT SF, THOMAS PA, BASS EB. Promotion criteria for clinicianeducators in the United States and Canada: A Survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA 1997; 278: 723-8.
8. PANGARO L, FINCHER RM, BACHICHA J, GELB D, BRODKEY A, MORGENSTERN B ET AL. Expectations of and for Clerkship Directors: A Collaborative Statement from the Alliance for Clinical Education. Teach Learn Med 2003; 15: 217-22.
9. IRBEY DM, COOKE M, LOWENSTEIN D, RICHARDS B. The Academy movement: a structural approach to reinvigorating the education mission. Acad Med 2004; 79: 729-36.
10. SIMPSON DE, FINCHER RM. Making a case for the teaching scholar. Acad Med 1999; 74: 1296-9.
11. st century. Acad Med 2000; 75: 887-94.
12. FINCHER RM, WORK JA. Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching. Med Educ 2006; 40: 293-5.
13. D'ALESSANDRI RM, ALBERTSEN P, ATKINSON B, DICKLER RM, JONES RF, KIRCH DG ET AL. Measuring Contributions to the Clinical Mission of Medical Schools and Teaching Hospitals. Acad Med 2000; 75: 1231-77.
14. GLASSICK CE. Boyer's Expanded Definitions of Scholarship, the Standards for Assessing Scholarship, and the Elusiveness of the Scholarship of Teaching. Acad Med 2000; 75: 877-80.
15. LYNCH DC, SURDYK PM, EISER AR. Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature. Med Teacher 2004; 26: 366-73.
16. WILLIAMS RG, DUNNINGTON GL, FOLSE JR. The Impact of a Program for Systematically Recognizing and Rewarding Academic Performance. Acad Med 2003; 78: 156-66.
17. STERN DT, PAPADAKIS M. The Developing Physician Becoming a Professional. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1794-8.
18. ARON DC, LASH R, AUCOTT JN, THRON CD, WRIGHT SM, KERN DE ET AL. Attending-Physician Role Models. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1598-62.