Hierarchical information integration experiments and integrated choice experiments

Transport Reviews

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 635-655

  Molin, Eric J E ^a   Timmermans, Harry J P ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; TRANSPORTATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 70449093376     PISSN: 01441647     EISSN: 14645327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01441640902829470     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1981) Foundations of Information Integration Theory (New York: Academic Press).
2. Anderson, N. H. (1982) Methods of Information Integration Theory (London: Academic Press).
3. Arentze, T. A, Borgers, A. W. J., Timmermans, H. J. P. and DelMistro, R. (2003) Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy, Transportation Research Part E, 39, pp. 229-244.
4. Borgers, A. W. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1993) Transport facilities and residential choice behavior: a model of multi-person choice processes, Papers in Regional Science, 72, pp. 45-61.
5. Bos, D. M and Molin, E. J. E. (2006) Is there a 'stick' bonus? A stated choice model for P&R patronage incorporating cross-effects, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 6(3), pp. 275-290.
6. Bos, D. M, Molin, E. J. E., Timmermans, H. J. P. and Van der Heijden, R. E. C. M. (2003) Cognitions and relative importances underlying consumer valuation of park and ride facilities, Transportation Research Records, 1835, pp. 121-127.
7. Bos, D. M., Van der Heijden, R. E. C. M., Molin, E. J. E. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2004) The choice of park & ride facilities: an analysis using a context-dependent hierarchical choice experiment, Environment and Planning A, 36(9), pp. 1673-1686.
8. Caussade, S., Ortuzár, J. de D., Rizzi, L. I. and Hensher, D. A. (2005) Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates, Transportation Research Part B, 39, pp. 621-640.
9. Chiang, Y. S., Lu, J. L. and Chang, H. C. (2003) Modeling the effect of destination attributes on the intercity travelers' mode choice behavior in Taiwan area, Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 4 (October), pp. 717-730.
10. Dellaert, B. G. C., Prodigalidad, M. and Louviere, J. J. (1998) Using conjoint analysis to study family travel preference structures: a comparison of day trips and 1-week holidays, Tourism Analysis, 2, pp. 67-75.
11. Hensher, D. A. (1991) Hierarchical stated response designs and estimation in the context of bus use preferences, Logistics and Transportation Reviews, 26(4), pp. 299-323.
12. Hensher, D. A. (2006) How do respondents process stated choice experiment? Attribute consideration under varying information load, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21, pp. 861-878.
13. Johnson, R. D. (1987) Making judgments when information is missing: inferences, biases, and framing effects, Acta Psychologica, 66, pp. 69-82.
14. Louviere, J. J. (1984) Hierarchical Information Integration: a new method for the design and analysis of complex multiattribute judgement problems, in: T. C. Kinnear (Ed.) Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, pp. 148-155 (Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research).
15. Louviere, J. J. and Gaeth, G. J. (1987) Decomposing the determinants of retail facility choice using the method of hierarchical information integration: a supermarket illustration, Journal of Retailing, 63, pp. 25-48.
16. Louviere, J. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1990a) Hierarchical Information Integration applied to residential choice behavior, Geographical Analysis, 22, pp. 127-145.
17. Louviere, J. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1990b) Using hierarchical information integration to model consumer responses to possible planning actions: recreation destination choice illustration, Environment and Planning A, 22, pp. 291-309.
18. Louviere, J. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1992) Testing the external validity of hierarchical conjoint analysis models of recreational destination choice, Leisure Science, 14, pp. 179-194.
19. Molin, E. J. E. (1999) Conjoint Modeling Approaches for Residential Group Preferences. Dissertation (Einhoven: Faculteit Bouwkunde, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven).
20. Molin, E. J. E. and van Gelder, M. (2008) Freeway access to public transport: a hierarchical multimodal choice model, Transportation Research Records, 2076, pp. 106-113.
21. Molin, E. J. E., Oppewal, H. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1999) Group-based versus individual-based conjoint preference models of residential preferences: a comparative test, Environment and Planning A, 31(11), 1935-1947.
22. Molin, E. J. E., Oppewal, H. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2000) A comparison of full profile and Hierarchical Information Integration conjoint methods to modeling group preferences, Marketing Letters, 11(2), pp. 165-175.
23. Molin, E. J. E., Oppewal, H. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2003) Conjoint modeling of residential group preferences: a comparison of Hierarchical Information Integration approaches, Journal of Geographical Systems, 4(4), pp. 343-358.
24. Molin, E. J. E. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2003) Testing Hierarchical Information Integration theory: the causal structure of residential satisfaction, Environment and Planning A, 35(1), pp. 43-58.
25. Norojono, O. and Young, W. (2003) A stated preference freight mode choice model, Transportation Planning and Technology, 26, pp. 195-212.
26. Oppewal, H., Alexander, A. and Sullivan, P. (2006) Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility in town shopping centres and their influence on shopping evaluations, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, pp. 261-274.
27. Oppewal, H. and Klabbers, M. (2003) Compromising between information completeness and task simplicity: a comparison of self-explicated, hierarchical information integration, and full-profile conjoint methods, in: P. A. Keller and D. W. R. Valdosta (Eds.) Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 30, pp. 298-304 (Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research).
28. Oppewal, H., Louviere, J. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1994) Modeling hierarchical conjoint processes with integrated choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, pp. 92-105.
29. Oppewal, H. and Vriens, M. (2000) Measuring perceived service quality using integrated conjoint experiments, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18, pp. 154-169.
30. Orzechowski, M. A, Arentze, T. A., Borgers, A. W. J. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (2008) The applicability of Bayesian belief networks for measuring user preferences: some numerical simulations, Planning and Design, 35, pp. 521-534.
31. Pullman, M., Dodson, K. J. and Moore, W. L. (1999) A comparison of conjoint methods when there are many attributes, Marketing Letters, 10(2), pp. 123-138.
32. Swait, J. and Louviere, J. J. (1993) The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and use of generalized extreme value models, Journal of Marketing Research, 30, pp. 305-314.
33. Timmermans, H. J. P. (1989) Een decompositioneel hiërarchisch model voor woningkeuze: theorie en illustratie, [A decompositional hierarchical model for residential choice: theory and illustration] in: S. Musterd (Ed.) Methoden voor Woning-en Woonmilieubehoeften Onderzoek, pp. 46-72 (Amsterdam: Siswo).
34. Timmermans, H. J. P., Borgers, A. W. J., van Dijk, J. and Oppewal, H. (1992) Residential choice behaviour of dual-earner households: a decompositional joint choice model, Environment and Planning A, 24, pp. 517-533.
35. Ülengin, B. (1998) Using Hierarchical Information Integration to examine customer preferences in banking, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16, pp. 202-210.
36. Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F. and Güvenç, Ü. (2001) A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: the case of Istanbul, European Journal of Operation Research, 130, pp. 361-374.
37. Ülengin B., Ülengin, F. and Güvenç, Ü. (2002) Living environment preferences of the inhabitants of Istanbul: a modified hierarchical information integration model, Social Indicators Research, 57, pp. 13-41.
38. Van de Vijvere, Y., Oppewal, H. and Timmermans, H. J. P. (1998) The validity of hierarchical information integration choice experiments to model residential preference and choice, Geographical Analysis, 30(3), pp. 254-272.
39. Van der Heijden, R. E. C. M. and Molin, E. J. E. (2002) Locating P&R facilities based on travel behaviour: a Dutch case study. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 7th Urban Transport Conference, Sevilla, Spain, March 2002.
40. Vriens, M., Oppewal, H., Linde, J. A. and Bremer, H. (1995) Simultane analyse van preferenties en percepties: Een toepassing op bankdiensten [Simultaneous analysis of preferences and perceptions in services: An application to banking services], Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, oktober, pp. 613-625.