The structure of communication behavior in simulated and actual crisis negotiations

Human Communication Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 443-478

  Taylor, Paul J ^a   Donald, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044260808     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/30.4.443     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
2. Benton, A. A., &Druckman, D. (1973). Salient solutions and the bargaining behavior of representatives and non-representatives. International Journal of Group Tensions, 3, 28-39.
3. Ben-Yoav, O., &Pruitt, D. G. (1984). Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 283-295.
4. Bolton, R. (1984). People skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Borg, I., &Shye, S. (1995). Facet theory: Form and content. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Boster, R J. (2002). On making progress in communication science. Human Communication Research, 28, 473-490.
7. Bowers, J. W. (1963). Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change. Speech Monographs, 30, 415-420.
8. Buss, D. M., Gomes, M., Higgins, D. S., &Lauterbach, K. (1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1219-1229.
9. Carnevale, P. J. D., &Lawler, E. J. (1987). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636-659.
10. Cohen, J. A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
11. Donohue, W. A. (1981). Development of a model of rule use in negotiation interaction. Communication Monographs, 48, 106-120.
12. Donohue, W. A. (1991). Communication, marital dispute, and divorce mediation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Donohue, W. A. (1998). Managing equivocality and relational paradox in the Oslo peace negotiations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 72-96.
14. Donohue, W. A. (2001). Resolving relational paradox: The language of conflict in relationships. In W. R Eadie &P. E. Nelson (Eds.), The language of conflict resolution (pp. 21-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Donohue, W. A., Diez, M. E., &Hamilton, M (1984). Coding naturalistic negotiation interaction. Human Communication Research, 10, 403-425.
16. Donohue, W. A., Ramesh, C., Kaufmann, G., &Smith, R. (1991). Crisis bargaining in intense conflict situations. International Journal of Group Tensions, 21, 133-145.
17. Donohue, W. A., &Roberto, A. J. (1993). Relational development as negotiated order in hostage negotiation. Human Communication Research, 20, 175-198.
18. Donohue, W. A., &Roberto, A. J. (1996). An empirical examination of three models of integrative and distributive bargaining. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 209-229.
19. Donohue, W. A., &Taylor, P. J. (2003). Role effects in negotiation: The one-down eject. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University.
20. Drake, L. E., &Donohue, W. A. (1996). Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution. Communication Research, 23, 297-322.
21. Falbo, T. (1977). Multidimensional scaling of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 537-547.
22. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, UK: Oliver &Boyd.
23. Fitzpatrick, M. A., Falls, S., &Vance, L. (1980). Multifunctional coding of conflict resolution strategies in marital dyads. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Speech Communication Association, New York, NY.
24. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York Wiley.
25. Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., &Stutman, R. K. (1993). Working through conflict. New York: HarperCollins.
26. Gayle, B. M., &Preiss, R. W. (1999). Language intensity plus: A methodological approach to validate emotions in conflict. Communication Reports, 12, 43-50.
27. Golan, M. B. (1978). Children in institutional settings: Privacy, social interaction, and self-esteem. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
28. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
29. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
30. Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 47-58.
31. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.
32. Holmes, M. E. (1992). Phase structures in negotiation. In L. L. Putnam &M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp. 83-105). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Holmes, M. E., &Fletcher-Bergland, T. S. (1995). Negotiations in crisis. In A. M. Nicotera (Ed.), Conflict and organizations: Communicative processes (pp. 239-256). Albany: State University of New York Press.
34. Holmes, M. E., &Sykes, R. E. (1993). A test of the fit of Gulliver's phase model to hostage negotiations. Communication Studies, 44, 38-55.
35. Kelley, H. H. (1997). Expanding the analysis of social orientations by reference to the sequential-temporal structure of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 373-404.
36. Kinsch, W. (2002). On the notions of theme and topic in psychological process models of text comprehension. In M. Louwerse &W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 157-170). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
37. Lingoes, J. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes non-metric program series. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Michigan.
38. Mann, W. C., &Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243-281.
39. Markus, H. R., &Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
40. Marwell, G., &Schmitt, D. R. (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30, 350-364.
41. Millar, F. E., &Rogers, L. E. (1976). A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 87-103). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Miller, G., Boster, F., Roloff, M., &Seibold, D. (1977). Compliance-gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44, 37-51.
43. Mintu-Wimsatt, A., Lozada, H. R. (1999). Personality and negotiation revisited. Psychological Reports, 84, 1159-1170.
44. Oetzel, J., Ting-Toomey, S., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Xaiohui, P., Takai, J., &Wilcox, R. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 68, 235-258.
45. Olekalns, M., &Smith, P. L. (2000). Understanding optimal outcomes: The role of strategy sequences in competitive negotiations. Human Communication Research, 26, 527-557.
46. Powell, J. O. (1989). Negotiation processes in hostage and barricaded incidents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.
47. Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Strategic choice in negotiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 167-184.
48. Putnam, L. L., &Jones, T. S. (1982). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 171-191.
49. Rogan, R. G. (1995). Language intensity: Testing a content-based metric. Communication Reports, 8, 128-144.
50. Rogan, R. G. (1999). F.I.R.E.: A communication-based approach for understanding crisis negotiation. In O. Adang &E. Giebels (Eds.), To save lives; Proceedings of the first European conference on hostage negotiations (pp. 25-42). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
51. Rogan, R. G., &Donohue, W. A. (1991, November). Validation of a content-based measure of language intensity in naturalistic conflict discourse. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
52. Rogan, R. G., &Hammer, M. R. (1994). Crisis negotiations: A preliminary investigation of facework in naturalistic conflict. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 216-231.
53. Rogan, R. G., &Hammer, M. R. (1995). Assessing message affect in crisis negotiations: An exploratory study. Human Communication Research, 21, 553-574.
54. Rogan, R. G., &Hammer, M. R. (2002). Crisis/hostage negotiations: A communication-based approach. In H. Giles (Ed.), Law enforcement, communication, and community (pp. 229-254). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
55. Roloff, M. E. (1981). Interpersonal communication: The social exchange approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56. Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., &Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57. Runkel, P. J. (1956). Cognitive similarity in facilitating communication. Sociometry, 19, 178-191.
58. Runkel, P. J. (1963). Dimensionality, map matching, and anxiety. Psychological Reports, 13, 335-350.
59. Selye, H. (1978). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60. Shapira, Z. (1976). A facet analysis of leadership styles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 136-139.
61. Shell, G. R. (2001). Bargaining styles and negotiation: The Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instalment in negotiation training. Negotiation Journal, 17, 155-174.
62. Shoda, Y., &Mischel, W. (2000). Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 14, 407-428.
63. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., &Wright, G (1993). The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1023-1035.
64. Shye, S. (1978). Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65. Sillars, A. L. (1980). Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47, 180-200.
66. Sillars, A. L., Coletti, S. F., Parry, D., &Rogers M. A. (1982). Coding verbal conflict tactics: Nonverbal and perceptual correlates of the "avoidance-distributive-integrative" distinction. Human Communication Research, 9, 83-95.
67. Solomon, D. H., Dillard, J. P., &Anderson, J. W. (2002). Episode type, attachment orientation, and frame salience: Evidence for a theory of relational framing. Human Communication Research, 28, 136-152.
68. Stuhlmacher, A. F., Gillespie, T. L., &Champagne, M. V. (1998). The impact of time pressure in negotiation: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 97-116.
69. Taylor, P. J. (2002). A cylindrical model of communication behavior in crisis negotiations. Human Communication Research, 28, 7-48.
70. Tinsley, C. H. (2001). How negotiators get to yes: Predicting the constellation of strategies used across cultures to negotiate conflict Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 583-593.
71. Weingart, L. R., Prietula, M. J., Hyder, E. B., &Genovese, C. R. (1999). Knowledge and the sequential processes of negotiation: A Markov chain analysis of response-in-kind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 366-393.
72. Wilson, S. R., &Putnam, L. L. (1990). Interaction goals in negotiation. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 13 (pp. 374-406). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Wish, M., &Kaplan, S. J. (1977). Toward an implicit theory of interpersonal communication. Sociometry, 40, 234-246.