Bargaining styles and negotiation: The Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument in negotiation training

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 155-174

  Shell, G Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035620282     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013280109471     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allred, K.G. 2000. Distinguishing best and strategic practices: A framework for managing the dilemma between creating and claiming value. Negotiation Journal 16(4): 387-397.
2. Bazerman, M.H. and M.A. Neale. 1992. Negotiating rationally. New York: The Free Press.
3. Blake, R.R. and J.S. Mouton. 1964. The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publications.
4. Bordone, R.C. 2000. Teaching interpersonal skills for negotiation and for life. Negotiation Journal 16(4): 377-385.
5. Christie, R. and F.L. Geis, eds. 1970. Studies In Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
6. Fortgang, R.S. 2000. Taking stock: An analysis of negotiation pedagogy across four professional fields. Negotiation Journal 16(4): 325-338.
7. Gilkey, R.W. and L. Greenhalgh. 1986. The role of personality in successful negotiating. Negotiation Journal 2(3): 245-256.
8. Kabanoff, B. 1987. Predictive validity of the MODE Conflict Instrument. Journal of Applied Psychology 72(1): 160-163.
9. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 136-291.
10. Kahneman, D. D. P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Kilmann, R.H. and K.W. Thomas. 1977. Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict-handling behavior: The 'Mode' Instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement 37: 309-325.
12. Knapp, L., L.L. Putnam, and L.J. Davis. 1988. Measuring interpersonal conflict in organizations: Where do we go from here? Management Communication Quarterly 1(3): 414-429.
13. Kolb, D.M. and J. Williams. 2000. The shadow negotiation: How women can master the hidden agendas that determine bargaining success. New York: Simon and Schuster.
14. Konovsky, M.A., F. Jaster, and M.A. McDonald. 1989. Using parametric statistics to explore the construct validity of the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Management Communication Quarterly 3(2): 268-290.
15. Rubin, J.Z. and R.B. Brown. 1975. The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
16. Shell, G.R. 1999. Bargaining for advantage: Negotiation strategies for reasonable people. New York: Penguin.
17. Williams, G.R. 1983. Legal negotiation and settlement. St. Paul: West.
18. Womack, D. F. 1988. A review of conflict instruments in organizational settings. Management Communication Quarterly 1(3): 437-445.
19. _. 1988a. Assessing the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Survey. Management Communication Quarterly 1(3): 321-349.