Personality and negotiation revisited

Psychological Reports

Volumn 84, Issue 3 PART 2, 1999, Pages 1159-1170

  Mintu Wimsatt, Alma ^a   Lozada, Hector R ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY COMMERCE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007188102     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1999.84.3c.1159     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ANGELMAR, R., & STERN, L. (1978) Development of a content analysis of bargaining communications in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 93-102.
2. BOTTOM, W., & STUDT, A. (1993) Framing effects and the distributive aspect of integrative bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 56, 459-474.
3. BRODT, S. (1994) Inside information and negotiator decision behavior. Group and Organization Management, 58, 172-202.
4. BUTLER, J. (1995) Behaviors, trust, and goal achievement in a win-win negotiating role play. Group and Organization Management, 20, 486-501.
5. FELLS, R. (1983) Developing trust in negotiations. Employee Relations, 15, 33-45.
6. FISHER, R., & URY, W. (1981) Getting to say yes. New York: Penguin Books.
7. GRAHAM, J., MINTU, A., & RODGERS, W. (1994) Explorations of negotiation behaviors in ten foreign cultures using a model developed in the United States. Management Science, 40, 72-95.
8. GREENHALGH, L., NESLIN, S., & WILKEY, R. (1985) The effects of negotiator preferences, situational power, and negotiator personality on outcomes of business negotiations. Academy of Management Review, 28, 9-33.
9. HARNETT, D., & CUMMINGS, L. (1980) The person in bargaining. In D. Harnett & L. Cummings (Eds.), Bargaining behavior: an international study. Houston, TX: Dame Publications. Pp. 81-116.
10. HARNETT, D., CUMMINGS, L., & HUGHES, G. (1968) The influence of risk taking propensity on bargaining. Behavioral Science, 13, 1-11.
11. HUSEMAN, R., HATFIELD, J., & MILES, E. (1987) A new perspective on equity theory: the equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222-234.
12. KING, W., & HINSON, T. (1994) The influence of sex and equity sensitivity on relationship preferences, assessment of opponent, and outcomes in a negotiation experiment. Journal of Management, 20, 605-624.
13. KING, W., MILES, E., & DAY, D. (1993) A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301-317.
14. LEWIN, K. (1936) Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. MINTU-WIMSATT, A., & CALANTONE, R. (1996) Exploring factors that affect negotiators' problem-solving orientation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 11, 61-73.
16. MINTU-WIMSATT, A., & GRAHAM, J. (1998) Antecedents and outcomes of problem-solving. In T. Scandura & M. Serapio (Eds.), Research in international business and international relations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 117-137.
17. OLEKALNS, M., SMITH, P., & WALSH, T. (1996) The process of negotiating: strategy timing as predictors of outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 68-77.
18. PERDUE, B. (1992) Ten aggressive tactics of industrial buyers. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 7, 45-52.
19. PRUITT, D. (1981) Bargaining behavior. New York: Academic Press.
20. RUBIN, J., & BROWN, B. (1975) The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
21. SAXE, R., & WEITZ, B. (1982) The SOCO Scale: a measurement of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 343-351.
22. SHURE, G., & MEEKER, R. (1967) Personality attitude schedule for use in experimental bargaining studies. The Journal of Psychology, 65, 233-252.
23. WALL, J., & BLUM, M. (1991) Negotiations. Journal of Management, 17, 273-303.
24. WALTON, R., & MCKERSIE, R. (1965) Behavior labor theory of labor negotiations New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. WESTBROOK, K. (1996) Coordinative maneuvers during buyer-seller negotiations. Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 283-292.