The effects of confidence and advisor motives on advice utilization

Communication Research

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 857-873

  van Swol, Lyn M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Advice; Confidence; Deception; Group decision making; Suspicion

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350770713     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650209346803     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Bond, C.F., Jr., & DePaulo, B.M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
3. Budescu, D.V., & Rantilla, A.K. (2000). Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions. Acta Psychologica, 104, 371-398.
4. Buller, D.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203-242.
5. Buller, D.B., & Hunsaker, F. (1995). Interpersonal deception: XIII. Suspicion and the truth-bias of conversational participants. In J. Aitken (Ed.), Intrapersonal communication processes reader (pp. 237-257). Westland, MI: McNeil.
6. Buller, D.B., Strzyzewski, K.D., & Comstock, J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1-24.
7. Buller, D.B., Strzyzewski, K.D., & Hunsaker, F.G. (1991). Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational Ps as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58, 25-40.
8. Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., Dillman, L., & Walther, J.B. (1995). Interpersonal deception: IV. Effects of suspicion on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Human Communication Research, 22, 163-196.
9. Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., Ebesu, A.S., & Rockwell, P. (1994). Interpersonal deception V: Accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61, 303-325.
10. Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., Ebesu, A.S., White, C.H., & Rockwell, P. (1996). Testing interpersonal deception theory: Effects of suspicion on communication behaviors and perceptions. Communication Theory, 6, 243-267.
11. DePaulo, B.M. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans learn to do better? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83-86.
12. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
14. Fein, S., & Hilton, J.L. (1994). Judging others in the shadow of suspicion. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 167-198.
15. Heath, C., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Interaction with others increase decision confidence but not decision quality: Evidence against information collection views of interactive decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 305-326.
16. Instone, D., Major, B., & Bunker, B.B. (1983). Gender, self-confidence, and social influence strategies: An organizational simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 322-333.
17. Johnson, H.H., & Torcivia, J.M. (1967). Group and individual performance on a single-stage task as a function of distribution of individual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 266-273.
18. Levine, T.R., Park, H.S., & McCornack, S.A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the veracity effect. Communication Monographs, 66, 125-144.
19. McCornack, S.A., & Levine, T.R. (1990). When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception. Communication Monographs, 57, 119-138.
20. McCornack, S.A., & Parks, M.R. (1986). Deception detection and relationship development: The other side of trust. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 9 (pp. 377-389). Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
21. Miller, G.R., & Stiff, J.B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Peterson, D.K., & Pitz, G.F. (1988). Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 14, 85-92.
23. Phillips, J.M. (1999). Antecedents of leader utilization of staff input in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 215-242.
24. Pippert, W. (2007). Truth and lies, courts and spies. The APS Obsever, 20, 33.
25. Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
26. Price, P.C., & Stone, E.R. (1994). Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: Evidence for a confidence heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 39-57.
27. Savadori, L., Van Swol, L.M., & Sniezek, J.A. (2001). Information sampling and confidence within groups and judge advisor systems. Communication Research, 28, 737-771.
28. Schul, Y., Burnstein, E., & Bardi, A. (1996). Dealing with deceptions that are difficult to detect: Encoding and judgment as a function of preparing to receive invalid information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 228-253.
29. Sniezek, J.A., & Buckley, B. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 159-174.
30. Sniezek, J.A., & Van Swol, L.M. (2001). Trust and expertise in a judge advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 288-307.
31. Stephenson, G.M., Abrams, D., Wagner, W., & Wade, G. (1986). Partners in recall: Collaborative order in the recall of a police interrogation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 341-343.
32. Stiff, J.B., Kim, H.J., & Ramesh, C.N. (1992). Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19, 326-345.
33. Toris, C., & DePaulo, B.M. (1984). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063-1073.
34. Van Swol, L.M. (2005). Trust and confidence in the acceptance of expert advice. Unpublished manuscript.
35. Van Swol, L.M., & Sniezek, J.A. (2005). Factors affecting the acceptance of expert advice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 443-461.
36. Vonk, R., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1994). The sovereignty of negative inferences: Suspicion of ulterior motives does not reduce the negativity effect. Social Cognition, 12, 169-186.
37. Yaniv, I. (1997). Weighting and trimming: Heuristics for aggregation of judgments under uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 237-249.
38. Yaniv, I. (2004). The benefit of additional opinions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 75-78.
39. Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 260-281.
40. Yates, J.F., Lee, J.W., & Shinotsuka, H. (1996). Beliefs about overconfidence, including its cross-national variation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 138-147.
41. Zaleska, M. (1978). Individual and group choices among solutions of a problem when solution verifiability is moderate or low. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 37-53.
42. Zarnoth, P., & Sniezek, J.A. (1997). The social influence of confidence in group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 345-366.
43. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-59). New York: Academic Press.