Recognizing the impact of E-discovery amendments on electronic records management

Information Systems Management

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 350-356

  Ward, Burke T ^a   Purwin, Carolyn ^b   Sipior, Janice C ^a   Volonino, Linda ^c  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Attorney at Law   (United States)

^c CANISIUS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer forensics; E discovery; Electronic records management spoliation; Electronically stored information

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; E DISCOVERIES; ELECTRONIC DISCOVERIES; ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENTS; ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATIONS; FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES; LEGAL CASE;

COMPUTER FORENSICS;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 70350759557     PISSN: 10580530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10580530903245721     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Advisory Committee Notes (2006). Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The complete text of the Federal Rules of civil procedure are available at http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp
2. American Bar Association (2009a). Answers to Questions about the Attorney-Client Privilege. Retrieved May 10, 2009 from http://www.abanet.org/media/issues/acprivilegeqa. html American Bar Association (2009b). Sample document retention policy. Retrieved May 10, 2009 from http://www.abanet.org/lpm/lpt/ articles/sampledocretentionpolicy.pdf Arthur Andersen, LLP v. United States (2005). 544 U.S. 696.
3. Barker, R. M., Cobb, A. T., & Karcher, J. (2009). The legal implications of electronic document retention: Changing the rules. Business Horizons 52, 177-186.
4. Bauccio, S. J. (2007). E-Discovery: Why and How E-mail Is Changing the Way Trials Are Won and Lost, Duquesne Law Review, 45(269), 271-290.
5. Chong, M. (2007). The Role of Internal Communication and Training in Infusing Corporate Values and Delivering Brand
6. Promise: Singapore Airlines' Experience. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 201-212.
7. Cohen, A. I., & Kalbaugh, G. E. (2009). ESI Handbook Sources, Technology and Process. Aspen Publishers New York, New York, USA.
8. Crist, M. P. (2006). Preserving the Duty to Preserve: The Increasing Vulnerability of Electronic Information, 58 S.C. L. Rev., 7.
9. Danna, S. K. (2005). The Impact of Electronic Discovery on Privilege and the Applicability of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev., 1683, 1729.
10. Favro, P. J. (January 2006). A New Frontier in Electronic Discovery: Preserving and Obtaining Metadata, 13 B.U.J. Sci. & Tech., L. 1. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2009). Rule 26(b)(2)(B).
11. Jordan Lawrence Group (2006). LC, Survey of Corporate Records Practices. Retrieved May 10, 2009 http://www.jordanlawrence group.com
12. Judicial Panelists Debate Need for Rules Covering Discovery of Electronic Data (March 3, 2004). 22 Empl. Discrim. Rep. (BNA) 9, at 252.
13. Lexbe Litigation Unleashed (2007). E-Discovery and Metadata. Retrieved May 10, 2009 from http://www.lexbe.com/hp/
14. indepth-e-discovery-rule-metadata.htm
15. Paul, R. A. & Chung, L. H. (Summer 2008). Brave new Cyberworld: The Employers' Legal Guide to the Interactive Internet. Labor Lawyer, 24(109).
16. Rothstein, B., Hedges, R. & Wiggins, E. (2007). Managing Discovery of Electronic Information: A pocket Guide for Judges, Federal Judicial Center.
17. Rowe Entertainment, Inc. v. William Morris Agency, Inc, 205 F.R.D. 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
18. Sedona Principles, 2nd, ed. (2007). Best Practices Recommendation and Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production. The Sedona Conference Working Group Series, available at http://www.thesedonaconference.org/content/miscFiles/TSC_ PRINCP_ 2nd_ed_607.pdf.
19. Torres, T. (September/October 2006). Creating a Process-Focused retention Schedule. The Information Management Journal.
20. United States vs. Philip Morris, No. CIV.A.99-2496, 2004 WL1627252 (D.D.C. July 21 2004).
21. Volonino, L., Sipior, J. C. & Ward, B. T. (2007). Managing the Lifecycle of Electronically Stored Information. Information Systems Management, 24(3), 231-238, DOI: 10.1080/10580530701404637.
22. Ward, B. T., Sipior, J. C., Volonino, L. & Peterson, G. (2007). Computer Forensics, E-Discovery, and Spoliation: Impact of the New Federal Rules. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Keystone, Colorado, USA. August 9-12, 2007.
23. William T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corp., Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1443, 1455 (C.D. Cal.1984).
24. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC (Zubulake III) (2003). 216 F.R.D. at 322.
25. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC (Zubulake IV) (2003). 220 F.R.D. 212, 217 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).
26. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC (Zubulake V) (2003). 229 F.R.D. at 430, 2004 (court acknowledging the duty of counsel in electronic litigation).