Managing the lifecycle of electronically stored information

Information Systems Management

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 231-238

  Volonino, Linda ^a   Sipior, Janice C ^b   Ward, Burke T ^b  

^a CANISIUS COLLEGE   (United States)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Document retention; E discovery; Electronically stored information

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS DOCUMENTS; COMPLIANCE REGULATIONS; DOCUMENT RETENTION; E DISCOVERIES; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT; ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATIONS; FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 34547243143     PISSN: 10580530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10580530701404637     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Benson, R. J. (2004). The increasing significance of computer forensics in litigation. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 16 (11), 1-4.
2. Coleman Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., No. 03-5045, 2005 WL 674885 (FIa. Cir. Ct. March 23, 2005).
3. Fishel, D. & Levitt, C. (2006, December). New tools in the discovery of sound recordings. Los Angeles Lawyer, 29,46-48. Retrieved May 23, 2007, from http://www.lacba.org/Files/LAL/Vol29No10/2328.pdf.
4. Gabbert, B. (2007, January). Prevent producing and requesting too much." E-Discovery Advisor, Doc# 18757.
5. Judicial Conference Committee On Rules of Practice and Procedure (2005). Committee on Rules of Practice & Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Summary of the Report of the Judicial Conference.
6. Kish, L. (2006, May). Most U.S. companies engaged in lawsuits. E-Discovery Advisor, Doc # 18390.
7. Kovar, J. F. (2007, March 12). The new storage rules-order in the court: Keeping up with data storage requirements. CRN, 1232, 27.
8. Legal Information Institute (LII) (2006), Cornell Law School, Retrieved April 1, 2007, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp
9. NextPage (2006, October 6). Document retention policies failing at the desktop, according to study. EContent, Retrieved April 1, 2007, from http://www.econtentmag.com/Articles/ArticleReader.aspx?ArticleID=18348 and Retrieved April 1, 2007, from http://www. nextpage.com/cio
10. Schwartz, E. (2007, March 27). Unified under law: Unified communications offers worthwhile benefits, but beware its potential legal pitfalls. InfoWorld. Retrieved April 1,2007, from. http://www.infoworld.com/ article/07/03/27/14OPreality_1.html?source=searchresult.
11. Sedona Guidelines. (2005, September). Best practices guidelines and commentary for managing information & records in the electronic age. Retrieved April 1, 2007, from http://www.thesedonaconference. org
12. Shapiro, G. M. & Kilpatrick, B. A. (2004). E-mail discovery and privilege. The Corporate Counsel Review, 23, Section 201.
13. Watson, L. M. (2004). Anticipating electronic discovery in commercial cases. Michigan Bar Journal, 83, Section 31.
14. Yoshinaka, R. (2007, February). Facing the changes in the federal rules of civil procedure." KM World, 1-11.
15. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 217 F.R.D. 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2003); 220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003); 382 F. Supp. 2d 536 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).