Who’s teaching, who’s learning? analyzing the professional growth of graduate student tutors

Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 227-245

  Atkinson, Terry S ^a   Colby, Susan A ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350711382     PISSN: 13611267     EISSN: 14699745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13611260500493642     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allington, R. L., 2001. What really matters for struggling readers: designing research-based program, New York: Longman.
2. Alvermann, D. E., 2001. “ Effective literacy instruction for adolescents ”. In Executive Summary and paper commissioned by the National Reading Conference, Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
3. Anders, P. L., Hoffman, J. V., and Duffy, G. G., 2000. “ Teaching teachers to teach reading: paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges ”. In Handbook of reading research, Edited by: Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., and Barr, R., (vol. 3), 719–742. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bear, D. R., Invernezzi, M., Templeton, S., and Johnston, F., 2000. Words their way, Columbus, OH: Merrill.
5. Cawelti, G., ed. 1995. “ Tutoring ”. In Handbook of research on improving student achievement, Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
6. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., and Kulik, C. L., 1982. Educational outcomes of tutoring: a meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19: 237–248.
7. Ehri, L. C., and Mccormick, S., 1998. Phases of word learning: implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14: 135–163.
8. Feiman-Nemser, S., 2001. From preparation to practice: designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 6: 1013–1055.
9. Fountas, I., and Pinnell, G. S., 1996. Guided Reading: good first teaching for all children, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Fountas, I., and Pinnell, G. S., 2001. Guided reading and writers (grades 3–6): teaching comprehension, genre, & content literacy, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11. Fuller, F. F., 1969. Concerns of teachers: a developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6: 207–226.
12. Haberman, M., 1992. The role of the classroom teacher as a curriculum leader. NASSP Bulletin, 76: 11–19.
13. Harvey, S., and Goudvis, A., 2000. Strategies that work, York, ME: Stenhouse.
14. Hunt, D. E., 1971. Matching models in education, Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
15. Johnston, P. H., and Winograd, P., 1985. Passive failure in reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17: 279–301.
16. Kagan, D. M., 1992. Professional growth among preservice teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62: 129–169.
17. Keene, E. O., and Zimmerman, S., 1997. Mosaic of thought, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18. Koals, M. B., 2000. Graduate/undergraduate mentoring partnerships in a reading clinic environment. Journal of Reading Education, 26: 1–13.
19. Laster, B. (Chair), Cobb, J., Dozier, C., Feist-Willis, J., Freppon, P., Grogen, P., Hill, M., Johnston, P., Rosemary, C., Roskos, K., Walker, B., Welsch, K. K., and Zimmerman, B., Research on teacher learning in clinical settings: examining ways to improve literacy teaching through structured collaborative inquiry. paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference. December1–4, San Antonio, TX.
20. Leslie, L., and Caldwell, J. A., 2001. Qualitative reading inventory–3, New York: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Marzano, R. J., 2003. What works in schools: translating research into action, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22. McCabe, P. P., and Margolis, H., 2001. Enhancing the self-efficacy of struggling readers. The Clearing House, 57: 45–49.
23. McCarrier, A., Fountas, I. C., and Pinnell, G. S., 1999. interactive writing: how language & literacy come together, K-2, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
24. McCormick, S., 2003. Instructing students who have literacy problems, Columbus, OH: Merrill.
25. Merriam, S. B., 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
26. Miller, S. D., and Atkinson, T. S., 2001. Cognitive and motivational effects of seeking academic assistance. Journal of Educational Research, 6: 323–335.
27. Morris, D., 1999. Howard Street tutoring manual, New York: Guilford.
28. Morris, D., Ervin, C., and Conrad, K., 1996. A case study of middle school reading disability. The Reading Teacher, 49: 368–377.
29. Morrow, L. M., ed. 1995. Family literacy: connections in schools and communities, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
30. Moyer, P. S., and Hussman, J., 2000. The development of autonomy orientations as part of teacher development: what’s experience got to do with it?. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 34: 40–48.
31. Osguthorpe, R. T., and Scruggs, T. E., 1986. Special education students as tutors: a review and analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 7: 15–26.
32. Patton, M. Q., 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd edn), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Pressley, M., 2001. Effective beginning reading instruction. Executive summary and paper commissioned by the National Reading Conference, Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
34. Redford, W., and Freppon, P., 2001. A teacher’s and a student’s literacy learning: case study descriptions of cognitive and affective growth during the school year. Journal of Reading Education, 26: 15–20.
35. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Kagan, J., and Byers, H., 1999. The effectiveness of adult volunteer tutoring on reading among ‘a-risk’ first grade children. Reading Research and Instruction, 38: 143–152.
36. Schön, D., 1983. The reflective pactitioner, New York: Basic Books.
37. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., and Griffin, P., eds. 1998. Preventing reading difficulties in young children, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. Stake, R. E., 1995. The art of case study research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Swain, S. S., 1998. Studying teachers’ transformations: reflection as methodology. The Clearing House, 72: 28–34.
40. Tharp, R., and Gallimore, R., 1988. Rousing minds to life: teaching, learning, & schooling in social context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Tharp, R., and Gallimore, R., 1995. Rousing minds to life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. S., 1990. Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Worthy, J., 2000. Teachers’ and students’ suggestions for motivating middle school students to read. Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 49: 441–451.
44. Worthy, J., Moorman, M., and Turner, M., 1999. What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34: 12–27.