Combined pitch and roll and cybersickness in a virtual environment

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 80, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 941-945

  Bonato, Frederick ^a   Bubka, Andrea ^a   Palmisano, Stephen ^b  

^a SAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Pseudo Coriolis; Rotation axis; Sensory conflict; Vection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORIOLIS PHENOMENON; CYBERSICKNESS; DISORIENTATION; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE MOVEMENT DISORDER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; NAUSEA; PITCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROTATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SYMPTOM; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; AEROSPACE MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350675539     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.2394.2009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andre JT, Muth ER, Stern RM, Leibowitz HM. The effect of tilted stripes in an optokinetic drum on gastric myoelectric activity and subjective reports of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 1996; 67:30-33
2. Bonato F, Bubka A, Palmisano S, Phillip D, Moreno G. Vection change exacerbates simulator sickness in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2008; 17:283-292
3. Bonato F, Bubka A, Palmisano S. Multiple axis rotation and cybersickness in a virtual environment. [abstract]. Aviat Space Environ Med 2008; 79:309.
4. Bonato F, Bubka A, Story M. Rotation direction change hastens motion sickness onset in an optokinetic drum. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76:823-827 (Pubitemid 41266078)
5. Bubka A, Bonato F. Optokinetic drum tilt hastens the onset of vection-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 2003; 74:315-319 (Pubitemid 36389313)
6. Bubka A, Bonato F, Urmey S, Mycewicz D. Rotation velocity change and motion sickness in an optokinetic drum. Aviat Space Environ Med 2006; 77:811-815 (Pubitemid 44232238)
7. Cobb S, Nichols S, Ramsey AR, Wilson JR. Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1999; 8:169-186
8. Dichgans J, Brandt T. Optokinetic motion sickness and pseudo-Coriolis effects induced by moving stimuli. Acta Otolaryngol 1973; 76:339-348
9. Dichgans J, Brandt T. Visual-vestibular interaction: effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Held R, Leibowitz H, Teuber HL, eds. Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol.8. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1978:755-804.
10. Diels C, Howarth PA. Visually induced motion sickness during single and dual axis motion. In: So R, Cheung R, Chow E, et al, eds. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Visually Induced Motion Sickness, Fatigue, and Photosensitive Epileptic Seizures (VIMS2007); December 10-11, 2007; Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; 2007:24-32.
11. Draper MH, Viirre ES, Furness TA, Gawron VJ. The effects of virtual image scale and system delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Hum Factors 2001;43:129-146
12. Guedry FE, Montague EK. Quantitative evaluation of the vestibular Coriolis reaction. Aerosp Med 1961; 32:487-500.
13. Guignard JC, McCauley ME. The accelerative stimulus for motion sickness. In: Crampton GH, ed. Motion and space sickness. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1990:123-152
14. Hettinger LJ, Berbaum KS, Kennedy RS, Dunlap WP, Nolan MD. Vection and simulator sickness. Mil Psychol 1990; 2:171-181
15. Howard IP, Childerson L. The contribution of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt. Perception 1994; 23:753-762
16. Joseph JA, Griffin MJ. Motion sickness: effect of the magnitude of roll and pitch oscillation. Aviat Space Environ Med 2008; 79:390-396
17. Kennedy RS, Drexler JM, Compton DE, Stanney KM, Lanham DS, et al. Configural scoring of simulator sickness, cybersickness, and space adaptation syndrome: similarities and differences. In: Hettinger LJ, Hass MW, eds. Virtual and adaptive environments: applications, implications, and human performance issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003:247-278
18. Kennedy RS, Fowlkes JE. Simulator sickness is polygenic and polysymptomatic: implications for research. Int J Aviat Psychol 1992; 2:23-38.
19. Kennedy RS, Kennedy RC, Kennedy S. Cybersickness aftereffects and the implications of using simulators for mission rehearsal. [Abstract.] Aviat Space Environ Med 2009; 80:315.
20. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 1993; 3:203-220
21. LaViola Jr JJ. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. SIGCHI Bulletin 2000; 32:47-56.
22. Merhi O, Faugloire E, Flanagan M, Stoffregen TA. Motion sickness, console video games, and head-mounted displays. Hum Factors 2007; 49:920-934 (Pubitemid 47442112)
23. Oman CM. Motion sickness: a synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1990; 68:294-303.
24. Palmisano S, Bonato F, Bubka A, Folder J. Vertical display oscillation effects on forward vection and simulator sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007; 78:951-956 (Pubitemid 47511953)
25. Patterson R, Winterbottom MD, Pierce BJ. Perceptual issues in the use of head-mounted displays. Hum Factors 2006; 48:555-73. (Pubitemid 44639237)
26. Reason J, Brand J. Motion sickness. London: Academic Press; 1975:103-128
27. Treisman M. Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science 1977; 197:493-495
28. Wertheim AH, Bos JE, Bles W. Contributions of roll and pitch to sea sickness. Brain Res Bull 1998; 47:517-524 (Pubitemid 29095362)