Vertical display oscillation effects on forward vection and simulator sickness

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 78, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 951-956

  Palmisano, Stephen ^a   Bonato, Frederick ^b   Bubka, Andrea ^b   Folder, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b SAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Optic flow; Self motion; Sensory conflict; Simulator sickness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISORIENTATION; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; FEMALE; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; NAUSEA; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICS; OSCILLATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIMULATOR; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; VELOCITY; VERTICAL DISPLAY OSCILLATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTION SICKNESS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 34848857050     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.2079.2007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andersen GJ, Braunstein ML. Induced self-motion in central vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1985; 11:122-32.
2. Berthoz A, Pavard B, Young LR. Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linear vection). Exp Brain Res 1975; 23:471-89.
3. Bles W, Bos JE, de Graaf B, et al. Motion sickness: only one provocative conflict? Brain Res Bull 1998; 47:481-7.
4. Bonato F, Bubka A, Palmisano S. Changing and steady vection effects on simulator sickness [Abstract]. J Vis 2006; 6:383a.
5. Bubka A, Bonato F. Optokinetic drum tilt hastens the onset of vection-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 2003; 74:315-9.
6. Dichgans J, Brandt T. Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Held R, Leibowitz H, Teuber HL, eds. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol 8. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1978: 755-804.
7. Ebenholtz SM, Cohen MM, Linder BJ. The possible role of nystagmus in motion sickness: a hypothesis. Aviat Space Environ Med 1994; 65:1032-5.
8. Hanagan MB, May JG, Dobie TG. Optokinetic nystagmus, vection, and motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 2002; 73:1067-73.
9. Grossman GE, Leigh RJ, Bruce EN, Heuber WP, Lanksa DJ. Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion. J Neurophysiol 1989; 62:264-72.
10. Hettinger LJ, Berbaum KS, Kennedy RS, Dunlap WP, Nolan MD. Vection and simulator sickness. Mil Psychol 1990; 2:171-81.
11. Hettinger L, Riccio GE. Visually induced motion sickness in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1992; 1:306-10.
12. Hirasaki E, Moore ST, Raphan T, Cohen B. Effects of walking velocity on vertical head and body movements during locomotion 1999; Exp Brain Res 1999; 127:117-30.
13. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 1993; 3:203-20.
14. Kitazaki M, Hashimoto T. Effects of perspective jitter on vection and visual control of posture are dissociated [Abstract]. J Vis 2006; 6:149a.
15. Lee GCH, Younghak Y, Jones S. Investigation of driving performance, vection, postural sway and simulator sickness in a fixed-based driving simulator. Proceedings of 1996ICC. Computers and Industrial Engineering 1997; 33:533-6.
16. Palmisano S, Burke D, Allison RS. Coherent perspective jitter induces visual illusions of self-motion. Perception 2003; 32:97-110.
17. Palmisano S, Chan AYC. Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands. Perception 2004; 33:987-1000.
18. Palmisano S, Gillam BJ. Stimulus eccentricity and spatial frequency interact to determine circular vection. Perception 1998; 27:1067-77.
19. Palmisano S, Gillam BJ, Blackburn SG. Global perspective jitter improves vection in central vision. Perception 2000; 29:57-67.
20. Previc FH. The effects of background visual roll stimulation on postural and manual control and self-motion perception. Percept Psychophys 1993; 54:93-107.
21. Previc FH. Visual orientation mechanisms. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics 2004; 203:95-143.
22. Reason JT. Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model. J R Soc Med 1978; 71:819-29.
23. Stern RM, Hu S, Anderson MS, Leibowitz HW, Koch KL. The effects of fixation and restricted visual field on vection-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 1990; 61:712-5.
24. Webb NA, Griffin MJ. Eye movement, vection, and motion sickness with foveal and peripheral vision. Aviat Space Environ Med 2003; 74:622-5.
25. Zacharias GL, Young LR. Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotation. Exp Brain Res 1981; 41:159-71.