Macrophage response to zinc oxide nanorod surfaces -topography and toxicity

IFMBE Proceedings

Volumn 24, Issue , 2009, Pages 119-120

  Zaveri, T ^a   Dolgova, N ^a   Chu, B H ^b   Lee, J ^b   Lele, T ^b   Ren, F ^b   Keselowsky, B G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomaterials; Macrophages; Nanotopography; Toxicity; ZnO nanorods

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL APPLICATION; BIOMATERIAL IMPLANTATION; BIOMATERIAL SURFACES; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; CELL TYPES; DENTAL FILLING; FLAT SUBSTRATES; FLAT SURFACES; FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE; GLUCOSE DETECTION; IMPLANT MATERIALS; IMPLANTED MATERIALS; IN-CELL; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; MACROPHAGE ADHESION; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; NON-CONTACT; REFERENCE GLASS; WOUND HEALING; ZINC OXIDE NANORODS; ZNO; ZNO NANOROD;

ADHESION; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CELL ADHESION; DENTAL PROSTHESES; DISSOLUTION; FILLING; GLASS; GLUCOSE; NANORODS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOXICITY; ZINC; ZINC OXIDE;

MACROPHAGES;

EID: 70350604730     PISSN: 16800737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01697-4_41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Anderson JM. Biological responses to materials. Annual Review of Materials Research 2001;31:81-110.
2. Ratner BD. Reducing capsular thickness and enhancing angio-genesis around implant drug release systems. Journal of Controlled Release 2002;78:211-8.
3. Kao WJ, Hubbell JA, Anderson JM. Protein-mediated macrophage adhesion and activation on biomaterials: a model for modulating cell behavior. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine 1999;10:601-5.
4. Moriarty P. Nanostructured materials. Reports on Progress in Physics 2001;64:297-381.
5. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006;311:622-7.
6. Colon G, Ward BC, Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2006;78A:595-604.
7. Elias KL, Price RL, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. Biomaterials 2002;23:3279-87.
8. Price RL, Waid MC, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Bio-materials 2003;24:1877-87.
9. Jong Youl Kim DKJELaTJW. Decreased Macrophage Density on Carbon Nanofiber Patterns. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 2007;950.
10. Lee JY, Kang BS, Hicks B, et al. The control of cell adhesion and viability by zinc oxide nanorods. Biomaterials 2008;29:3743-9.
11. Sun XW, Kwok HS. Optical properties of epitaxially grown zinc oxide films on sapphire by pulsed laser deposition. Journal of Applied Physics 1999;86:408-11.
12. Agren MS, Mirastschijski U. The release of zinc ions from and cytocompatibility of two zinc oxide dressings. J Wound Care 2004;13:367-9.
13. Gojova A, Guo B, Kota RS, Rutledge JC, Kennedy IM, Barakat AI. Induction of inflammation in vascular endothelial cells by metal oxide nanoparticles: Effect of particle composition. Environmental Health Perspectives 2007;115:403-9.