Clinical study of arterial anatomic variations for transradial coronary procedure in Chinese population

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 122, Issue 18, 2009, Pages 2097-2102

  Nie, Bin ^a   Zhou, Yu Jie ^a   Li, Guo Zhong ^a   Shi, Dong Mei ^a   Wang, Jian Long ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Anatomic variation; Coronary angioplasty; Transradial angiography; Transradial approach

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DYSPLASIA; ARTERY MALFORMATION; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BRACHIAL ARTERY; CHINESE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL STUDY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY; VASCULAR RING;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70350591801     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.18.004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Gardiovasc Diagn 1989; 16: 3-7. (Pubitemid 19033502)
2. Kiemeneij F, Larrman GJ. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993; 30: 173-178. (Pubitemid 23292091)
3. Yang YJ, Xu B, Chen JL, Kang S, Qiao SB, Qin XW, et al. Comparison of immediate and followup results between transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in true bifurcational lesions. Chin Med J 2007; 120: 539-544. (Pubitemid 46629906)
4. Mann JT 3rd, Cubeddu MG, Schneider JE, Arrowood M. Right radial access for PTCA: a prospective study demonstrates reduced complications and hospital charges. J Invasive Cardiol 1996; 8 Suppl D: 40D-44D.
5. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, Van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of precutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1269-1275. (Pubitemid 27201945)
6. Mulukutla SR, Cohen HA. Feasibility and efficacy of transradial access for coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57: 167-171.
7. Cao Z, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, Liu YY, Shi DM, Guo YH, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in Chinese elderly patients. Chin Med J 2008; 121: 1126-1129.
8. Wiper A, Kumar S, MacDonald J, Roberts DH. Day case transradial coronary angioplasty: a four-year single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 549-553. (Pubitemid 44546048)
9. Yan ZX, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, Liu YY, Shi DM, Guo YH, et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Med J 2008; 121: 782-786.
10. Yokoyama N, Takeshita S, Ochiai M, Koyama Y, Hoshino S, Isshiki T, et al. Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 49: 357-362. (Pubitemid 30183656)
11. Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G, Rossini R, Tespili M, Guagliumi G, et al. Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2006; 67: 870-878. (Pubitemid 43837070)
12. Knebel AV, Cardoso CO, Correa Rodrigues LH, Sarmento-Leite RE, de Quadros AS, Mascia Gottschall CA. Safety and feasibility of transulnar cardiac catheterization. Tex Heart Inst J 2008; 35: 268-272.
13. Aptecar E, Pernes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, Bussy N, Catarino G, Shahmir A, et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67: 711-720.
14. Kiemeneij F, Fraser D, Slagboom T, Laarman G, van der Wieken R. Hydrophilic coating aids radial sheath withdrawal and reduces patient discomfort following transradial coronary intervention: a randomized double-blind comparison of coated and uncoated sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 161-164. (Pubitemid 36665944)
15. Yokoyama N, Takeshita S, Ochiai M, Hoshino S, Koyama Y, Oshima A, et al. Direct assessment of palmar circulation prior to transradial coronary intervention by color-Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 218-221. (Pubitemid 30410733)
16. Lim VY, Chan CN, Kwok V, Mak KH, Koh TH. Transradial access for coronary angiography and angioplasty: a novel approach. Singapore Med J 2003; 44: 563-569. (Pubitemid 38133494)
17. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, Kim JY, Lee SH, Hwang SO, et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol 2005; 101: 421-427. (Pubitemid 40719979)
18. Chen CW, Lin CL, Lin TK, Lin CD. A simple and effective regimen for prevention of radial artery spasm during coronary catheterization. Cardiology 2006; 105: 43-47. (Pubitemid 43265193)
19. Freeman RV, O'Donnell M, Share D, Meengs WL, Kline-Rogers E, Clark VL, et al. Nephropathy requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary intervention and the critical role of an adjusted contrast dose. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 1068-1073. (Pubitemid 35335595)
20. Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S. Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: 930-936.
21. Dangas G, Iakovou I, Nikolsky E, Aymong ED, Mintz GS, Kipshidze NN, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 13-19. (Pubitemid 40051105)