Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in Chinese elderly patients

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 121, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1126-1129

  Cao, Zheng ^a   Zhou, Yu Jie ^a   Zhao, Ying Xin ^a   Liu, Yu Yang ^a   Shi, Dong Mei ^a   Guo, Yong He ^a   Cheng, Wan Jun ^a   Nie, Bin ^a   Wang, Jian Long ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Elderly; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Transradial

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BRACHIAL ARTERY; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CHINESE; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; COMPARTMENT SYNDROME; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOREARM BLOOD FLOW; GERIATRIC SURGERY; HEART DEATH; HEART DISEASE; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATOMA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; RADIAL ARTERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; VASCULAR ACCESS;

EID: 51149103476     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00029330-200806020-00017     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bagger H, Kristensen JH, Christensen PD, Klausen IC. Routine transradial coronary angiography in unselected patients. J Invasive Cardiol 2005; 17: 139-141.
2. Cox N, Resnic FS, Popma JJ, Simon DI, Eisenhauer AC, Rogers C, et al. Comparison of the risk of vascular complications associated with femoral and radial access coronary catheterization procedures in obese versus nonobese patients. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 1174-1177.
3. Kawashima O, Endoh N, Terashima M, Ito Y, Abe S, Ootomo T, et al. Effectiveness of right or left radial approach for coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 61: 333-337.
4. Hildick-Smith DJ, Walsh JT, Lowe MD, Petch, MC. Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: the transradial route is successful and safe. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 58: 8-10.
5. Cha KS, Kim MH, Kim YD, Kim JS. Combined right transradial coronary angiography and selective carotid angiography: safety and feasibility in unselected patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 380-385.
6. Cha KS, Kim MH, Kim HJ. Prevalence and clinical predictors of severe tortuosity of right subclavian artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 1220-1222.
7. Floyd KC, Jayne JE, Kaplan AV, Friedman BJ, Niles NW, Hettleman BD, et al. Age-based differences of percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. J Interv Cardiol 2006; 19: 381-387.
8. Assali AR, Moustapha. A, Sdringola S, Salloum J, Awadalla H, Saikia S, et al. The dilemma of success: percutaneous coronary interventions in patients > or = 75 years of age-successful but associated with higher vascular complications and cardiac mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 195-199.
9. Feldman DN, Gade CL, Slotwiner AJ, Parikh M, Bergman G, Wong SC, et al. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 1334-1339.
10. Blankenship JC, Hellkamp AS, Aguirre FV, Demko SL, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. Vascular access site complications after percutaneous coronary intervention with abciximab in the Evaluation of c7E3 for the prevention of ischemic complications (EPIC) trial. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 36-40.
11. Morice MC, Dumas P, Lefevre T, Loubeyre C, Louvard Y, Piechaud JF. Systematic use of transradial approach or suture of the femoral artery after angioplasty: attempt at achieving zero access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 51: 417-421.
12. Mann T, Cowper PA, Peterson ED, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, Giron L, et al. Transradial coronary stenting: comparison with femoral access closed with an arterial suture device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49: 150-156.
13. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 349-356.
14. Mulvihill NT, Crean PA. The radial artery: an alternative access site for diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures. Ir J Med Sci 2005; 174: 79-83.
15. Sanmartin M, Cuevas D, Goicolea J, Ruiz-Salmeron R, Gomez M, Argibay V, et al. Vascular complications associated with radial artery access for cardiac catheterization. Rev Esp Cardiol 2004; 57: 581-584.
16. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, Morice M. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 181-187.
17. Galli M, Tano GD, Mameli S, Butti E, Politi A, Zerboni S, et al. Ad hoc transradial coronary angioplasty strategy: experience and results in a single centre. Interv J Cardiol 2003; 92: 275-280.
18. Yokoyama N, Takeshita S, Ochiai M, Koyama Y, Hoshino S, Isshiki T, et al. Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49: 357-362.
19. Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G, Rossini R, Tespili M, Guagliumi G, et al. Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67: 870-878.
20. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, Kim JY, Lee SH, Hwang SO, et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Intl J Cardiol 2005; 101: 421-427.
21. Stork S, Beld AW, Schacky C, Angermann CE, Lamberts SW, Grobbee DE, et al. Carotid artery plaque burden, stiffness, and mortality risk in elderly men: a prospective, population-based cohort study. Circulation 2004; 110: 344-348.