Theory of transient streaming potentials associated with axial-symmetric flow in unconfined aquifers

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 179, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 990-1003

  Malama, Bwalya ^a   Kuhlman, Kristopher L ^b   Revil, André ^c,d  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Hydrogeophysics; Hydrology; Permeability and porosity

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITION; DATA INVERSION; DRAWDOWN; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LAPLACE TRANSFORM; MODELING; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; STREAMING POTENTIAL; UNCONFINED AQUIFER;

EID: 70350580475     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04336.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bailey DH, Jeyabalan K, Li XS. A comparison of three high-precision quadrature schemes. Exp. Math. 2000, 14(3):317-329.
2. Barrash W, Clemo T. Hierarchical geostatistics and multifacies systems: Boise hydrogeophysical research site, Boise, Idaho. Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38(10):1196. doi
3. Barrash W, Reboulet E. Significance of porosity for stratigraphy and textural composition in subsurface, coarse fluvial deposits: Boise hydrogeophysical research site. Geol. soc. Am. Bull. 2004, 116:1059-1073. doi
4. Barrash W, Morin RH, Gallegos DM. Lithologic, hydrologic, and petrophysical characterization of an unconsolidated cobble-and-sand aquifer, capital station site, Boise, Idaho. 1997, 307-323. in, pp, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID
5. Barrash W, Clemo T, Fox JJ, Johnson TC. Field, laboratory, and modeling investigation of the skin effect at wells with slotted casing. J. Hydrol. 2006, 326(1-4):181-198. doi
6. Bear J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media 1972, Dover, New York
7. Bogoslovsky VA, Ogilvy AA. Deformations of natural electric fields near drainage structures. Geophys. Prospect. 1973, 21:716-723.
8. Bolève A, Crespy A, Revil A, Janod J, Mattiuzzo JL. Streaming potentials of granular media: influence of the Dukhin and Reynolds numbers. J. geophys. Res. 2007, 112:B08204. doi
9. Cardiff M, Barrash W, Kitanidis PK, Malama B, Revil A, Straface S, Rizzo E. A potential-based inversion of unconfined steady-state hydraulic tomography. Ground Water 2009, 47(2):259-270.
10. Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC. Conduction of Heat in Solids 1959, 273. 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, New York, pp
11. Chandler R. Transient streaming potential measurements on fluid-saturated porous structures: an experimental verification of Biot's slow wave in the quasi-static limit. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1981, 70(1):116-121.
12. Clement WP, Knoll MD, Liberty LM, Donaldson PR, Michaels PM, Barrash W, Pelton JR. Geophysical surveys across the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site to determine geophysical parameters of a shallow alluvial aquifer. 1999, 399-408. in, Oakland, CA, March, pp
13. Darnet M, Marquis G, Sailhac P. Estimating aquifer hydraulic properties from the inversion of surface Streaming Potential (SP) anomalies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30(13):1679-1682. doi
14. Doherty J. Manual for PEST 2002, 5th edn, Watermark Numerical Computing, Australia
15. Jardani A. Reconstruction of the water table from self-potential data: a Bayesian approach. Ground Water 2009, 47(2):213-227.
16. Leroy P, Revil A, Altmann S, Tournassat C. Modeling the composition of the pore water in a clay-rock geological formation (Callovo-Oxfordian, France). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2007, 71(5):1087-1097. doi
17. Kresic N. Hydrogeology and Groundwater Modeling 2007, 192. 2nd edn, CRC Press, New York, pp
18. Maineult A, Strobach E, Renner J. Self-potential signals induced by periodic pumping tests. J. geophys. Res. 2008, 113:B01203. doi
19. Malama B, Revil A, Kuhlman KL. A semi-analytical solution for transient streaming potentials associated with confined aquifer pumping tests. Geophys. J. Int.. 2009, 176:1007-1016. doi
20. Moench AF. Specific yield as determined by type-curve analysis of aquifer-test data. Ground Water 1994, 32(6):949-947.
21. Neuman SP. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table. Water Resour. Res. 1972, 8(4):1031-1045.
22. Neuman SP, Witherspoon PA. Theory of flow in aquicludes adjacent to slightly leaky aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 1968, 4(1):103-112.
23. Nwankwor GI, Cherry JA, Gillham RW. A comparative study of specific yield determinations for a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water 1984, 22(6):764-772.
24. Nwankwor GI, Gillham RW, van der Kamp G, Akindunni FF. Unsaturated and saturated flow in response to pumping of an unconfined aquifer: field evidence of delayed drainage. Ground Water 1992, 30(5):690-700.
25. Othberg KL. Geology and geomorphology of the Boise valley and adjoining areas, western snake river plain, Idaho. Idaho Geol. Surv. Bull. 1994, 29:1-54.
26. Petiau G. Second generation of lead-lead chloride electrodes for geophysical applications. Pageoph 2000, 157:357-382.
27. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical Recipies 2007, 3rd edn, Cambridge University Press
28. Revil A, Naudet V, Nouzaret J, Pessel M. Principles of electrography applied to self-potential electrokinetic sources and hydrogeological applications. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39(5):1114. doi
29. Rizzo E, Suski B, Revil A. Self-potential signals associated with pumping tests experiments. J. geophys. Res. 2004, 109:B10203. doi
30. Sailhac P, Marquis G. Analytic potential for the forward and inverse modeling of SP anomalies caused by subsurface fluid flow. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001, 28(9):1851-1854.
31. Sanchez-Vila X, Tartakovsky DM. Ergodicity of pumping tests. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W03414. doi
32. Sill WR. Self-potential modeling from primary flows. Geophysics 1983, 48(1):76-86.
33. Squires E, Wood SH, Osiensky JL. Hydrogeologic framework of the Boise aquifer system, Ada county, Idaho, Technical Report. 1992, Idaho Water Resources Research Institute, Moscow, Idaho
34. Stehfest H. Algorithm 368: numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Commun. ACM 1970, 13(1):47-49.
35. Suski B, Rizzo E, Revil A. A sandbox experiment of self-potential signals associated with a pumping test. Vadose Zone J. 2004, 3:1193-1199.
36. Suski B, Revil A, Titov T, Konosavsky T, Voltz T, Dangès T, Huttel T. Monitoring of an infiltration experiment using the self-potential method. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42:W08418. doi
37. Takahasi H, Mori M. Double exponential formulas for numerical integration. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 1974, 9:721-741.
38. Tartakovsky GD, Neuman SP. Three-dimensional saturated-unsaturated flow with axial symmetry to a partially penetrating well in a compressible unconfined aquifer. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:1-17.
39. Titov K, Ilyin Y, Konosavski P, Levitski A. Electrokinetic spontaneous polarization in porous media: petrophysics and numerical modeling. J. Hydrol. 2002, 267:207-216.
40. Titov K, Revil A, Konasovsky P, Straface S, Troisi S. Numerical modeling of self-potential signals associated with a pumping test experiment. Geophys. J. Int. 2005, 162:641-650.
41. Wieder T. Algorithm 794: numerical Hankel Transform by the Fortran Program HANKEL. ACM Trans. Math. Software 1999, 25(2):240-250.