A semi-analytical solution for transient streaming potentials associated with confined aquifer pumping tests

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 176, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1007-1016

  Malama, B ^a   Revil, A ^b,c   Kuhlman, K L ^d,e  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^e SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrical properties; Hydrogeophysics; Hydrology

Indexed keywords

CONFINED AQUIFER; ELECTRICAL PROPERTY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROLOGY; PUMPING;

CALABRIA; EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 61349203955     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.04014.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I.A., 1972. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 10th edn, Dover Punblications, Inc., New York.
2. Bogoslovsky, V.A. & Ogilvy, A.A., 1973. Deformations of natural electric fields near drainage structures, Geophys. Prospect., 21, 716-723.
3. Darnet, M., Marquis, G. & Sailhac, P., 2007. Estimating aquifer hydraulic properties from the inversion of surface streaming potential (SP) anomalies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(13), 1679.
4. Doherty, J., 2001. PEST Groundwater Data Utilities, Watermark Numerical Computing, Australia.
5. Li, Y. & Neuman, S.P., 2007. Flow to a well in a five-layer system with application to the Oxnard Basin, Ground Water, 45(6), 672-682.
6. Mucha, I. & Paulikova, E., 1986. Pumping test using large-diameter production and observation wells, J. Hydrol., 89, 157-164.
7. Neuman, S.P. & Witherspoon, P.A., 1968. Theory of flow in aquicludes adjacent to slightly leaky aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 4(1), 103-112.
8. Revil, A., Naudet, V., Nouzaret, J. & Pessel, M., 2003. Principles of electrography applied to self-potential electrokinetic sources and hydrogeological applications, Water Resour. Res., 39(5), 1114.
9. Rizzo, E., Suski, B. & Revil, A., 2004. Self-potential signals associated with pumping tests experiments, J. geophys. Res., 109(B10203).
10. Sailhac, P. & Marquis, G., 2001. Analytic potential for the forward and inverse modeling of SP anomalies caused by subsurface fluid flow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(9), 1851-1854.
11. Sill, W.R., 1983. Self-potential modeling from primary flows, Geophysics, 48(1), 76-86.
12. Straface, S., Falico, C., Troisi, S., Rizzo, E. & Revil, A., 2007. An inverse procedure to estimate transmissivities from heads and SP signals, Ground Water, 45(4), 420-428.
13. Suski, B., Rizzo, E. & Revil, A., 2004. A sandbox experiment of self-potential signals associated with a pumping test, Vadose Zone J., 3, 1193-1199.
14. Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage, Trans., Am. Geophys. Un., 16, 519-524.
15. Titov, K., Ilyin, Y., Konosavski, P. & Levitski, A., 2002. Electrokinetic spontaneous polarization in porous media: Petrophysics and numerical modeling, J. Hydrol., 267, 207-216.
16. Titov, K., Revil, A., Konasovsky, P., Straface, S. & Troisi, S., 2005. Numerical modeling of self-potential signals associated with a pumping test experiment, Geophys. J. Int., 162, 641-650.
17. Yeh, T.C.J., Jin, M. & Hanna, S., 1996. An iterative stochastic inverse method: Conditional effective transmissivity and hydraulic head fields, Water Resour. Res., 32(1), 85-92.
18. Zhang, J. & Yeh, T.C.J., 1997. An iterative geostatistical inverse method for steady flow in the vadose zone, Water Resour. Res., 33(1), 63-71.