Development and evaluation of nursing user interface screens using multiple methods

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1004-1012

  Hyun, Sookyung ^a   Johnson, Stephen B ^a   Stetson, Peter D ^a   Bakken, Suzanne ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical Document Architecture; Document ontology; Electronic nursing documentation; Functional requirements; Nursing documentation templates; Task Technology Fit Model; Technology Acceptance Model; User interface; User centered approach

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DOCUMENT ARCHITECTURE; DOCUMENT ONTOLOGY; ELECTRONIC NURSING DOCUMENTATION; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; NURSING DOCUMENTATION TEMPLATES; TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER-CENTERED APPROACH;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY; RECORDS MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; USER INTERFACES;

NURSING;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NURSING RECORDS; SEMANTICS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70350564927     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Johnson S., Bakken S., Dine D., Hyun S., Mendonça E., Morrison F., et al. An electronic health record based on structured narrative. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15 1 (2008) 54-64
2. Stetson PD, Keselman A, Rappaport D, Van Vleck T, Cooper M, Boyer A et al. Electronic discharge summaries. In: AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005. p. 1121.
3. Dolin R., Alschuler L., Beebe C., Biron P., Boyer S., Essin D., et al. The HL7 clinical document architecture. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8 6 (2001) 552-569
4. Paterson G, Shepherd M, Wang X, Watters C, Zitner D, editors. Using the XML-based clinical document architecture for exchange of structured discharge summaries. In: The 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii; 2002.
5. OASIS. Health Level Seven XML Patient Record Architecture; 2001 [updated 2001 October 18; cited 2005 May 4]. Available from: http://xml.coverpages.org/hl7PRA.html.
6. Document Ontology Task Force and The LOINC Committee. HL7-LOINC Document Type Vocabulary Domain Paper; 2003 [updated 2003; cited 2008 January 18]. Available from: http://www.regenstrief.org/medinformatics/loinc/discussion-documents/ontology.doc/view?searchterm=Document%20Type%20Vocabulary%20Domain.
7. Davis F., Bagozzi R., and Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
8. Goodhue D., and Thompson R. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart 19 2 (1995) 213-236
9. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 13 3 (1989) 319-340
10. Dillon T., McDowell D., Salimian F., and Conklin D. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of bedside-computer systems. Comput Nurs 16 3 (1998) 151-156
11. Thompson R., Higgins C., and Howell J. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quart 15 1 (1991) 125-143
12. Dishaw M., and Strong D. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Inform Manag 36 1 (1999) 9-21
13. Dishaw M, Strong D, editors. Extending the task-technology fit model with self-efficacy constructs. In: Eighth American Conference on Information Systems; 2002.
14. Gassert C. Using a revised model to identify information requirements for cardiac surgery patients operating mobile computing technology. Stud Health Technol Inform 46 (1997) 172-175
15. Lundgren P, Wisser C, editors. Functional requirements for IT support for nursing information systems integrated in electronic healthcare record systems (EHCRS). In: International Congress in Nursing Informatics Conference. Amsterdam; IOS Press: 1997.
16. Goossen W.T., Epping P.J., and Dassen T. Criteria for nursing information systems as a component of the electronic patient record. An international Delphi study. Comput Nurs 15 6 (1997) 307-315
17. Hardiker NR, Bakken S. Requirements of tools and techniques to support the entry of structured nursing data. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;107(Pt 1):621-5.
18. Ireland R., James H., Howes M., and Wilson A. Design of a summary screen for an ICU patient data management system. Med Biol Eng Comput 35 4 (1997) 397-401
19. Dreamweaver. Adobe Systems Incorporated; 2006.
20. Joint Commission. The Joint commission Requirements; 2006 [retrieved August 10; 2006]. Available from: http://www.jcrinc.com/Joint-Commission-Requirements/.
21. Health Level 7. Health Level 7 Standards; 2004 [updated 2004; cited 2004 December 12]. Available from: www.hl7.org.
22. Dolin R., Alschuler L., Boyer S., Beebe C., Behlen F., Biron P., et al. HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13 1 (2006) 30-39
23. SyncRO Soft Ltd. XML Editor; 2002 [updated 2002; cited 2006 September 25]. Available from: http://www.oxygenxml.com/.
24. Huff S, Frazier P, Dolin R. HL7 LOINC Document Type Vocabulary Domain Paper; 2003 [updated 2003 September 24; cited]. Available from: http://www.regenstrief.org/loinc/discussion.
25. Hyun S., Ventura R., Johnson S.B., and Bakken S. Is the health level 7/LOINC document ontology adequate for representing nursing documents?. Stud Health Technol Inform 122 (2006) 527-531
26. Huff S., Rocha R., McDonald C., De Moor G., Fiers T., Bidgood W.J., et al. Development of the logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC) vocabulary. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5 3 (1998) 276-292
27. Hyun S, Bakken S, editors. Toward the creation of an ontology for nursing document sections: mapping section names to the LOINC semantic model. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, Washington, DC; 2006.
28. SNOMED International. SNOMED CT; 2006 [updated 2006; cited 2006 September 25]. Available from: http://www.ihtsdo.org.
29. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 13 3 (1989) 319-340
30. Lyness A., Hravnak M., and Martich D. Nurses' perceptions of the impact of a computerized information system on a critical care unit. Stud Health Technol Inform 46 (1997) 463-468
31. Lee T. Nurses' perceptions of their documentation experiences in a computerized nursing care planning system. J Clin Nurs 15 11 (2006) 1376-1382
32. Smith K., Smith V., Krugman M., and Oman K. Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Comput Inform Nurs 23 3 (2005) 132-138
33. Darbyshire P. 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. J Clin Nurs 13 1 (2004) 17-25
34. Johnson C., Johnson T., and Zhang J. A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces. J Biomed Inform 38 1 (2005) 75-87
35. Ammenwerth E., Mansmann U., Iller C., and Eichstädter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10 1 (2003) 69-84
36. Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and health care outcomes [database on the Internet]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2003 [cited 03.08.2007].
37. Nemeth C., Nunnally M., O'Connor M., Klock P., and Cook R. Getting to the point: developing IT for the sharp end of healthcare. J Biomed Inform 38 1 (2005) 18-25
38. Samaras G., and Horst R. A systems engineering perspective on the human-centered design of health information systems. J Biomed Inform 38 1 (2005) 61-74
39. Martin D., and Sommerville I. Patterns of cooperative interaction: linking ethnomethodology and design. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact (TOCHI) 11 1 (2004) 58-89
40. Xiao Y. Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible. J Biomed Inform 38 1 (2005) 26-33
41. Moody L., Slocumb E., Berg B., and Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Comput Inform Nurs 22 6 (2004) 337-344
42. Neve K., Kragh Iversen R., and Andersen C. Is it possible for nurses and doctors to form a useful clinical overview of an EHR?. Stud Health Technol Inform 122 (2006) 314-319
43. Hyun S. Design and evaluation of a standards-based, user-centered prototype electronic nursing documentation system (2007), Columbia University, New York
44. Danko A., Kennedy R., Haskell R., Androwich I., Button P., Correia C., et al. Modeling nursing interventions in the act class of HL7 RIM version 3. J Biomed Inform 36 4-5 (2003) 294-303
45. Goossen W., Ozbolt J., Coenen A., Park H., Mead C., Ehnfors M., et al. Development of a provisional domain model for the nursing process for use within the health level 7 reference information model. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11 3 (2004) 186-194
46. Bakken S., Hyun S., Friedman C., and Johnson S. ISO reference terminology models for nursing: applicability for natural language processing of nursing narratives. Int J Med Inform 74 7-8 (2005) 615-622
47. van Grunsven A., Bindels R., Coenen C., and de Bel E. Developing an integrated electronic nursing record based on standards. Stud Health Technol Inform 122 (2006) 294-297
48. Moss J., Coenen A., and Mills M. Evaluation of the draft international standard for a reference terminology model for nursing actions. J Biomed Inform 36 4-5 (2003) 271-278
49. Matney S., Bakken S., and SM H. Representing nursing assessments in clinical information systems using the logical observation identifiers, names, and codes database. J Biomed Inform 36 4-5 (2003) 287-293
50. Bakken S., Cimino J., Haskell R., Kukafka R., Matsumoto C., Chan G., et al. Evaluation of the clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) semantic structure as a terminology model for standardized assessment measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7 6 (2000) 529-538