Getting to the point: Developing IT for the sharp end of healthcare

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 18-25

  Nemeth, C ^a   Nunnally, M ^a   O'Connor, M ^a   Klock, P A ^a   Cook, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Cognition; Infusion devices; Patient safety; Scheduling; Sharp end; Technical work

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; TRANSPORTATION;

DYNAMIC CHANGE; HEALTHCARE; PROFESSIONAL REGULATIONS;

HEALTH;

COGNITION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFUSION SYSTEM; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAFETY;

EID: 13444306518     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cook R, Woods D, Miller C. A tale of two stories: contrasting views of patient safety, vol. 13. Chicago: National Health Care Safety Council of the National Patient Safety Foundation, American Medical Association; 1998. p. 36. Retrieved June 8, 2002 from the National Patient Safety Foundation Web site: http://www.npsf.org
2. R. Cook, M. Render, and D.D. Woods Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety BMJ 320 2000 791 794
3. Rasmussen J, Lind M. Coping with complexity. In: Proceedings of the European conference on human decision and manual control. The Netherlands: Delft; 1981
4. J. Rasmussen Merging paradigms: decision making, management, and cognitive control R. Flin E. Salas M. Strub L. Marton Decision-making under stress: emerging themes and applications 1998 Ashgate Brookfield, VT 67 81
5. J. Rasmussen The concept of human error: is it useful for the design of safe systems in healthcare C. Vincent B. DeMol Safety in medicine 2000 Elsevier Science Kiddington, Oxford, UK
6. C. Billings Aviation automation: the search for a human centered approach 1997 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
7. D.D. Woods Cognitive demands and activities in dynamic fault management: abduction and disturbance management N. Stanton Human factors of alarm design 1994 Taylor & Francis London
8. Hunt-Smith J, et al. Safety and efficacy of target controlled infusion (diprifusor) vs manually controlled infusion of propofol for anesthesia. Anaesthesia intensive care 1999. June 27, 260-4
9. Nunnally M, Nemeth C, Brunetti V, Cook R. Lost in menuspace: user interactions with complex medical devices. In: Nemeth C, Cook R, Woods D, editors. Special issue on using field studies to understand healthcare technical work. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A. 2004; 34: 736-42
10. K. Christoffersen, and D. Woods How to make automated systems team players Adv Hum Perform Cogn Eng Res 2 2002 1 12
11. Hutchins E. Cognitive artifacts, 126-7, Retrieved on July 7, 2002 from the MIT COGNET Web Site: http://cognet.mit.edu/MITECS/Entry/hutchins. 2002
12. E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild 1995 The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
13. Nemeth C. The master schedule: how cognitive artifacts affect distributed cognition in acute care. Dissertation abstracts international 64/08, 3990, (UMI No. AAT 3101124). 2003
14. J.O. Kephart, and D.M. Chess The vision of autonomic computing Comput IEEE Comput Soc 2003 41 50
15. C. Clegg, S. Ravden, M. Corbett, and S. Johnson Allocating functions in computer integrated manufacturing: a review and a new method Behaviour and information technology vol. 8 1989 Taylor & Francis London
16. Nemeth C, Cook R. Discovering and supporting temporal cognition in complex environments. 2004 National Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Chicago; August 2004
17. L. Mumford Technics and civilization 1934 Harcourt and Brace New York
18. J. Rasmussen Merging paradigms: decision making, management, and cognitive control R. Flin E. Salas M. Strub L. Martin Decision making under stress 1997 Ashgate Aldershot, UK 67 81
19. D. Woods, and E. Roth Cognitive systems engineering M. Helander Handbook of human-computer interaction 1988 North-Holland Amsterdam 3 43
20. G. Klein Sources of power 2000 The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
21. Nemeth C, Cook R, Woods DD, editors. Special issue on using field studies to understand health-care technical work. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A. 2004; 34
22. C. Nemeth Human factors methods for design 2004 Taylor & Francis/CRC Press London
23. M. Patton Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. vol. 11 3rd ed. 2002 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA
24. C. Heath, and P. Luff Technology in action 2000 Cambridge University Press New York p. 4-5
25. Frolich DM. Adding interaction analysis to the user research portfolio. Rethinking theoretical frameworks for human computer interaction. InterCHI'93. Amsterdam: association for computing machinery. Retrieved on December 14, 2002 from Hewlett Packard Web site: http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/93/HPL-93-39. pdf 1993. p. 1-2
26. P. Drew J. Heritage Talk at work 1992 Cambridge University Press New York
27. R. Lipschitz, and O.B. Shaul Schemata and mental models in recognition-primed decision making C.E. Zsambok G. Klein Naturalistic decision making 1997 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ 293
28. E. Hollnagel Mental models and model mentality L.P. Goodstein H.B. Andersen S.E. Olsen Tasks, errors and mental models 1998 Taylor and Francis New York 263 267 (see also p. 261-8