Evaluation of the draft international standard for a reference terminology model for nursing actions

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 36, Issue 4-5, 2003, Pages 271-278

  Moss, Jacqueline ^a   Coenen, Amy ^b   Mills, Mary Etta ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Nursing terminology; Reference terminology model; Terminology standards

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; STANDARD;

EID: 0344742252     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Button P., Androwich I., Hibben L.et al. Challenges and issues related to implementation of nursing vocabularies in computer-based systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5(4):1998;332-334.
2. Bakken S. An informatics infrastructure is essential for evidence-based practice. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(3):2001;199-201.
3. Coenen A., Marin H., Park H., Bakken S. Collaborative efforts for representing nursing concepts in computer-based systems: international perspectives. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(3):2001;202-211.
4. Bakken S., Cashen M., Mendonca E., O'Brien A., Zieniewicz J. Representing nursing activities within a concept-oriented terminological system. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7(1):2000;81-90.
5. Warren J, Mead C, Button P, Henry S, Androwich I. Development of the loose canon model of nursing interventions represented using the unified model language. In: AMIA annual symposium. Washington, DC: AMIA; 1999.
6. ISO, Health informatics-integration of a reference terminology model for nursing
7. Moen A., Henry S., Warren J. Representing nursing judgment in the electronic health record. J. Adv. Nurs. 30(4):1999;990-997.
8. Moorhead S., Delaney C. Mapping nursing intervention data into the nursing interventions classification (NIC): process and rules. Nurs. Diagn. 8(4):1997;137-144.
9. Harris M, Graves J, Herrick L, Elkin P, Chute C. The content coverage and organizational structure of terminologies: the example of postoperative pain. In: AMIA annual symposium. San Diego, CA: AMIA; 2000.
10. Bakken S, Warren, J, Lundberg, C, Casey, A, Correia, C, Konicek, D, Zingo, C. An evaluation of the utility of the CEN categorical structure for nursing diagnoses as a terminology model for integrating nursing diagnosis concepts into SNOMED. In: MEDINFO 2001. Amsterdam: IOS Press, p. 151-5.
11. CAP, About SNOMED: 35 years of experience in terminology maintenance. 2002, College of American Pathologists. Available from: http://www.snomed.org/ milestones_txt.html.
12. Bakken S., Cimino J., Haskell R.et al. Evaluation of the clinical LOINC (logical observation identifiers, names, and codes) semantic structure as a terminology model for standardized assessment measures. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7(6):2000;529-538.
13. Bakken S, Cashen M, O'Brien A. Evaluation of a type definition for representing nursing activities within a concept-based terminologic system. In: AMIA 1999.
14. Bakken S, Parker J, Konicek D, Campbell K. An evaluation of ICNP intervention axes as terminology model components. In: AMIA annual symposium. San Diego, CA: AMIA; 2000.
15. Iowa Intervention Project (2000). Nursing interventions classification. St. Louis, Mosby.
16. Waltz C., Strickland O., Lenz E. Measurement in nursing research. 2nd ed. 1991;F.A. Davis, Philadelphia.
17. Coenen A., Ryan P., Sutton J. Mapping nursing interventions from a hospital information system to the nursing interventions classification (NIC). Nurs. Diagn. 8(4):1997;145-151.
18. Delaney C., Moorhead S. Synthesis of methods, rules, and issues of standardizing nursing intervention language mapping. Nurs. Diagn. 8(4):1997;152-156.
19. Zielstorff R. Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5(3):1998;227-236.
20. Hardiker N., Rector A. Structural validation of nursing technologies. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(3):2001;212-221.
21. Saba V.K. The classification of home health care nursing: diagnoses and interventions. Caring Mag. 11(3):1992;50-57.
22. Martin K.S., Scheet N.J. The Omaha system: applications for community health nursing. 1992;WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
23. Ozbolt J.G. From minimum data to maximum impact: using clinical data to strengthen patient care. Adv. Prac. Nurs. Q. 1(4):1996;62-69.
24. International Council of Nurses (ICN), ICNP: international classification for nursing practice beta 2 version. Geneva, Switzerland: ICN; 2001.