Identifying uncertainties in judging the significance of human impacts on Natura 2000 sites

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 912-921

  Opdam, P F M ^a   Broekmeyer, M E A ^a   Kistenkas, F H ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

EU Habitats Directive; European environmental law; Habitats assessment; Nature conservation law; Precautionary principle; Science policy interface; Scientific uncertainty; Significant effects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FAUNA; FLORA; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN IMPACT (ENVIRONMENT); PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION; SPECIES HABITAT;

EID: 70350527164     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Atkinson S.F., Canter L.W., and Ravan M.D. The influence of incomplete or unavailable information on environmental impact assessment in the USA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26 (2006) 448-467
2. Bengtsson J., Angelstam P., Elmqvist T., Emanuelsson U., Folke C., Ihse M., Moberg F., and Nyström M. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32 6 (2003) 389-396
3. Beunen R. European nature conservation legislation and spatial planning: for better or for worse?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49 4 (2006) 605-619
4. Biggs R., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Atkinson-Palombo C., Bohensky E., Boyd E., Cundill G., Fox H., Ingram S., Kok K., Spehar S., Tengo M., Timmer D., and Zurek M. Linking futures across scales: a dialog on multiscale scenarios. Ecology and Society 12 1 (2007) 17. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art17
5. Bodansky D., Brunnée J., and Hey E. International Environmental Law (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
6. Brown J.D. Knowledge, uncertainty and physical geography: towards the development of methodologies for questioning belief. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers N.S. 29 (2004) 367-381
7. Dovers S.R., Norton T.W., and Handmer J.W. Uncertainty, ecology, sustainability and policy. Biodiversity and Conservation 5 10 (1996) 1143-1167
8. European Commission, 2000a. Communication on the precautionary principle. European Communities, Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/healthconsumer/library/pub/pub07.
9. European Commission, 2000b. Managing Natura 2000 sites. The provisions of article 6 of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC, European Communities, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/nature_conservation/eu_nature_legislation/specific_articles/art6/pdf/art6.
10. European Commission, 2002. Assessment of plans and projects significantly affecting Natura 2000 sites: Methodological guidance of the provisions of the Article 6(3) and 6(4) of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC. Office for official publications of the European communities, Luxembourg.
11. European Commission, 2006. Assessment, monitoring and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: explanatory notes and guidelines. Final draft 5, October 2006. European Communities, Brussels.
12. European Environmental Agency, 2002. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000. Environmental Issue Report 22, Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ISBN 92-9167-323-4.
13. Fahrig L. How much habitat is enough?. Biological Conservation 100 1 (2001) 65-74
14. Foppen R., Ter Braak C.J.F., Verboom J., and Reijnen R. Dutch Sedge warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus and West African rainfall: empirical and simulation modelling show low population resilience in fragmented marshlands. Ardea 87 1 (1999) 113-127
15. Foster K.R., Vecchia P., and Repacholi M.H. Science and the precautionary principle. Science 288 (2000) 979-980
16. Funtowicz S., Shepherd I., Wilkinson D., and Ravetz J. Science and governance in the European Union: a contribution to debate. Science and Public Policy 27 5 (2000) 327-336
17. Gollier Chr., and Treich N. Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: the economics of the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27 1 (2003) 77-103
18. Green D.G., Klomp N., Rimmington G., and Sadedin S. Complexity in Landscape Ecology (2006), Springer, Dordrecht, NL
19. Groffman P.M., Baron J.S., Blett T., Gold A.J., Goodman I., Gunderson L.H., Levinson B.M., Palmer M.A., Pearl H.W., Peterson G.D., Poff L.N., Rejeski D.W., Reynolds J.F., Turner M.G., Weathers K.C., and Wiens J. Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application?. Ecosystems 9 (2006) 1-13
20. Harremöes P. Ethical aspects of scientific incertitude in environmental analysis and decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production 11 7 (2003) 705-712
21. Hengeveld R. Dynamic Biogeography (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
22. Hewitt J.J., Thrush S.E., and Cummings V.J. Assessing environmental impacts: effects of spatial and temporal variability at likely impact scales. Ecological Applications 11 (2001) 1502-1516
23. Holling C.S., and Meffe G.K. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10 2 (1996) 328-337
24. Huggett A.J. The concept and utility of "ecological thresholds" in biodiversity conservation. Biological conservation 124 (2005) 301-310
25. Kriebel D., Tickner J., Epstein P., Lemons J., Levins R., Loechler E.L., Quinn M., Rudel R., Schettler T., and Stoto M. The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environmental Health Perspective 109 9 (2001) 871-876
26. LNV, 2006. Natura 2000 doelendocument. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit, The Hague, NL.
27. Kistenkas F.H. Integrating and Interpreting the Habitats- and Birds Directives. Tilburg Foreign Law Review 12 3 (2005) 255-265
28. Kistenkas F.H., and Broekmeyer M.E.A. Gaswinning Waddenzee. Hand aan de kraan of voet op de rem?. Nederlands Juristenblad 37 (2007) 2376-2377
29. Krämer L. EC Environmental Law (2003), Sweet & Maxwell, London, UK
30. Lawrence D.P. Impact significance determination-pushing the boundaries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (2007) 770-788
31. Lawrence D.P. Impact significance determination-back to basics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (2007) 755-769
32. Manson S.M. Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32 (2001) 405-414
33. Munns Jr. W.R. Assessing risks to wildlife populations from multiple stressors: overview of the problem and research needs. Ecology and Society 11 1 (2006) 23. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art23
34. Muradian R. Ecological thresholds: a survey. Ecological Economics 38 1 (2001) 7-24
35. NERI. Criteria to Favourable Conservation Status in Denmark (Preliminary Draft) (2005), National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark
36. Nooteboom S. Impact assessment procedures for sustainable development: a complexity theory perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (2007) 645-665
37. Opdam P., and Wascher D. Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation 117 3 (2004) 285-297
38. Oreskes N. Science and public policy: what's proof got to do with it?. Environmental Science and Policy 7 (2004) 369-383
39. PEER, 2007. Workshop on Concepts, Methods and Tools for Conservation Status Assessment, Reporting and Monitoring. http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/monnat/library?l=/habitats_reporting/reporting_2001-2007/background/workshops_seminars/roskilde-workshop-25-274&vm=detailed&sb=Title.
40. Pereira H.M., Daily G.C., and Roughgarden J. A framework for assessing the relative vulnerability of species to land use change. Ecological applications 14 3 (2004) 730-742
41. Pressey R.L., Cabeza M., Watts M.E., Cowling R.M., and Wilson K.A. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22 (2007) 583-592
42. Reckhow K.H. Importance of scientific uncertainty in decision making. Environmental Management 18 (1994) 161-166
43. Reijnen R., Foppen R., Ter Braak C., and Thissen J. The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. III. Reduction of density in relation to the proximity of main roads. Journal of Applied Ecology 32 (1995) 187-202
44. Sadeleer N.d. Environmental Principles. From Political Slogans to Legal Rules (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
45. Schultz C. Responding to scientific uncertainty in US forest policy. Environmental Science & Policy 11 (2008) 253-271
46. Storch D., Marquet P.A., and Brown J.H. Scaling Biodiversity (2007), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
47. Turnhout E., Hisschemöller M., and Eijsackers H. Science in Wadden Sea policy: from accommodation to advocacy. Environmental Science and Policy 11 (2008) 227-239
48. Verboom J., Foppen R., Chardon P., Opdam P., and Luttikhuizen P. Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent population: an example for marshland bird. Biological Conservation 100 (2001) 89-101
49. Vos C.C., Verboom J., Opdam P.F.M., and Braak C.J.F.t. Towards ecologically scaled landscape indices. American Naturalist 157 (2001) 24-51