Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation of paper sludge to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae RWB222. Part II: Investigation of discrepancies between predicted and observed performance at high solids concentration

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 932-938

  Zhang, Jiayi ^a   Shao, Xiongjun ^a   Lynd, Lee R ^a,b  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Fed batch; Model; Paper sludge; Simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation; SSCF

Indexed keywords

BATCH FERMENTATION; BATCH MODES; CELLULOSE PAPERS; ENZYME DEACTIVATION; ETHANOL INHIBITION; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FED BATCH; FED-BATCH FERMENTATION; HIGH-SOLIDS; KINETIC MODELS; MASS TRANSFER LIMITATION; MODEL PREDICTION; PAPER SLUDGE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND COFERMENTATION; SOLIDS CONCENTRATIONS; SOLIDS LOADING; SSCF;

CELLULOSE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME INHIBITION; ENZYMES; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; MASS TRANSFER; SACCHARIFICATION;

PAPER;

ALCOHOL;

ARTICLE; BATCH FERMENTATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME INACTIVATION; ENZYME INHIBITION; FUNGAL STRAIN; NONHUMAN; SACCHARIFICATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CELLULASE; DIFFUSION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; KINETICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PAPER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEWAGE; XYLOSE;

CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; ENZYMES; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; MASS TRANSFER; MODELS; PAPER; SACCHARIFICATION; SLUDGE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 70350523892     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22465     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN. 2001. Transport phenomena. 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 0-471-41077-2.
2. Cao Y, Huimin T. 2004. The effect of shear field on the hydrolysis of cellulose. J Macromol Sci Phys B43(6):1115-1121.
3. Chandrakant P, Bisaria VS. 1998. Simultaneous bioconversion of cellulose and hemicellulose to ethanol. Crit Rev Biotechnol 18:295-331. (Pubitemid 29021423)
4. Dasari RK, Dunaway K, Berson RE. 2009. A scraped surface bioreactor for enzymatic saccharification of pretreated corn stover slurries. Energy Fuels 23(1):492-497.
5. Fan ZL. 2004. Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol and analysis of selection based on strain improvement for recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing saccharolytic enzymes through continuous culture. USA: PhD thesis Dartmouth college.
6. Fogler HS. 2000. Elements of chemical reaction engineering, III Version. Prentice hall, PTR:p702.
7. Ganesh K, Joshi JB, Sawant SB. 2000. Cellulase deactivation in a stirred reactor Biochem Eng J 4(2):137-141.
8. Ghose TK. 1987. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59(2):257-268.
9. Helle SS, Duff SJB, Cooper DG. 1993. Effect of surfactants on cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 42(5):611-617.
10. Hodge DB, Karim MN, Schell DJ, McMillan JD. 2009. Model-based fed-batch for high-solids enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 152(1):88-107.
11. Howell JA, Mangat M. 1978. Enzyme deactivation during cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 20(6):847-863.
12. Kaya F, Heitmann JAWJT. 1996. Deactivation of cellulase and hemicellulase in high shear fields. Cellulose Chem Technol 30:49-56. (Pubitemid 126566349)
13. Kuyper M, Toirkens MJ, Diderich JA, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. 2005. Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylosefermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res 5(10): 925-934. (Pubitemid 40941017)
14. Lynd LR, Wyman CE, Gerngross TU, van Walsum P, Casten S. Use of process analysis to evaluate economics, research priorities, and lifecycle impacts for biomass processing 2000. pU523-U524.
15. Mohagheghi A, Dowe N, Schell D, Chou Y, Eddy C, Zhang M. 2004. Performance of a newly developed integrant of Zymomonas mobilis for ethanol production on corn stover hydrolysate. Biotechnol Lett 26:321-325. (Pubitemid 38285561)
16. Moniruzzaman M, Ingram LO. 1998. Ethanol production from dilute acid hydrolysate of rice hulls using genetically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett 20(10):943-947. (Pubitemid 28522067)
17. Ohta K, Beall DS, Mejia JP, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 1991. Metabolic engineering of Klebsiella oxytoca M5A1 for ethanol production from xylose and glucose. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2810-2815.
18. Pimenova NV, Hanley TR. 2004. Effect of corn stover concentration on rheological characteristics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 114(1-3):347-360. (Pubitemid 40068730)
19. Qureshi N, Dien BS, Nichols NN, Saha BC, Cotta MA. 2006. Genetically engineered Escherichia coli for ethanol production from xylose: Substrate and product inhibition and kinetic parameters. Food and Bioproducts Processing 84(2):114-122. (Pubitemid 43978145)
20. Shao XJ. 2007. Cellulosic biomass to ethanol: Kinetic modeling, scale up, and reactor design. USA: PhD thesis, Dartmouth College.
21. South CR, Hogsett DAL, Lynd LR. 1995. Modeling simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulose to ethanol in batch and continuous reactors. Enzyme Microb Technol 17:797-803.
22. Van Dyke BH. 1972. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: A kinetic study. USA: PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
23. Viamajalaa S, McMillanb JD, Schellb DJ, Elanderb RT. 2009. Rheology of corn stover slurries at high solids concentrations - Effects of saccharification and particle size. Bioresour Technol 100(2):925-934.
24. Wu Z, Lee YY. 1997. Inhibition of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by ethanol. Biotechnol Lett 19(10):977-979. (Pubitemid 27466441)
25. Wyman CE. 1999. Biomass ethanol: Technical progress, opportunities, and commercial challenges. Annu Rev Energy Environ 24:189-226.
26. Xiao Z, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN. 2004. Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and b-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 115(1-3):1115-1126. (Pubitemid 40068761)