Anatomic and functional assessment of coronary artery disease convergence of 2 aims in a single setting

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 163-165

  Min, James K ^a,b,c   Berman, Daniel ^a,b,c,d  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b BURNS AND ALLEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EDITORIAL; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOSINE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADENOSINE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70350461437     PISSN: 19419651     EISSN: 19420080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.873489     Document Type: Editorial

References (25)

1. Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Friedman JD, Polk DM, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, Germano G, Wong ND, Kang X, Rozanski A. Comparative use of radionuclide stress testing, coronary artery calcium scanning, and noninvasive coronary angiography for diagnostic and prognostic cardiac assessment. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:2-16.
2. Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. New technology for non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2007;115:1464-1480.
3. IMV 2007 Nuclear Medicine Market Summary Report. 2007.
4. Gould KL, Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:48-55.
5. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson L, Fieno DS, Germano G, Slomka P, Wong ND, Kang X, Rozanski A. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Nuc Med. 2006;47:74-82.
6. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, Friedman J, Diamond GA. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:535-543.
7. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GB, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, Weintraub WS, O'Rourke RA, Dada M, Spertus JA, Chaitman BR, Friedman J, Slomka P, Heller GV, Germano G, Gosselin G, Berger P, Kostuk WJ, Schwartz RG, Knudtson M, Veledar E, Bates ER, McCallister B, Teo KK, Boden WE. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117:1283-1291.
8. Demer LL, Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Kirkeeide RL, Mullani NA, Smalling RW, Nishikawa A, Merhige ME. Assessment of coronary artery disease severity by positron emission tomography. Comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients. Circulation. 1989;79:825-835.
9. Di Carli MF, Asgarzadie F, Schelbert HR, Brunken RC, Rokhsar S, Maddahi J. Relation of myocardial perfusion at rest and during pharmacologic stress to the PET patterns of tissue viability in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:558-566.
10. Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, Friedman JD, Case JA, Bryngelson JR, Hertenstein GK, Moutray KL, Reid K, Cullom SJ. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:24-33.
11. Campisi R, Di Carli MF. Assessment of coronary flow reserve and microcirculation: a clinical perspective. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:3-11.
12. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, Gerlach J, Yang L, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Thomson LEJ, Germano G. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:521-528.
13. Lima RS WD, Goode AR, Siadaty MS, Ragosta M, Beller GA, Samady H. Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42: 64-70.
14. IMV 2006 Cardiac Catheterization Lab Market Summary Report. 2006.
15. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, Scherer M, Bellinger R, Martin A, Benton R, Delago A, Min JK. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52: 1724-1732.
16. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, MolletNR, van Mieghem CA, Nieman K, van Werkhoven JM, Pundziute G, Weustink AC, de Vos AM, Pugliese F, Rensing B, Jukema JW, Bax JJ, Prokop M, Doevendans PA, Hunink MG, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52: 2135-2144.
17. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324-2336.
18. Cheng V, Gutstein A, Wolak A, Suzuki Y, Dey D, Gransar H, Thomson LEJ, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Berman DS. Moving beyond binary grading of coronary arterial stenoses on coronary CT angiography: insights for the imager and referring clinician. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:460-471.
19. Redberg RF, Walsh J. Pay now, benefits may follow-the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. N Engl J Med. 2008;359: 2309-2311.
20. Berman DS. Fourth annual Mario S. Verani MD Memorial Lecture: noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease: changing roles, changing players. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:457-473.
21. Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, Roguin A, Soil A, Dragu R, Litmanovich D, Frenkel A, Aronson D, Engel A, Beyar R, Israel O. Integrated singlephoton emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1059-1067.
22. Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1052-1058.
23. Becker CR. Cardiac CT: a one-stop-shop procedure? Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(Suppl 7):M65-M70.
24. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang HJ, Bluemke DA, Becker L, Yousuf O, Texter J, Lardo AC, Lima JAC. Adenosine stress 64-and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:174-182.
25. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, DiPaula A, Thompson DR, McCarthy WF, Ichihara T, Lima JA, Lardo AC. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:153-160.